Good morning and God bless! Time to focus on the #NextPlay.
The @cz_binance-@SBF_FTX drama teaches our #Crypto friends three lessons: 1. Decentralization is a self-serving illusion 2. Macro > Micro when Macro is bad 3. USD liquidity trumps all until $ is not the reserve currency
I spent dinner discussing the #FTX saga with my fiancé who knows as much about how global financial markets work as the average #Crypto bro. My explanation to her (and them) is as follows:
1. We live in a world where the price of every key asset in the world is in US dollars
2/
2. As a function of #1, we are all hyper obsessed with how many US dollars are available to price all the existing and future assets in the system
3. As a function of #2, we are also hyper obsessed with how fast that [unobservable] quantity of dollars is growing or shrinking
3/
4. As a function of #3, we are hyper obsessed with tracking and predicting activity of the institutions most directly responsible for controlling the quantity of US dollars available in the system to see how much they are likely to add or subtract at various intervals
4/
5. Such institutions include the Fed, Congress, commercial banks, shadow banks, etc.
6. We really only care about the economy to the extent economic signals reflexively alter the behavior of these key institutions. In isolation from “$ counting”, the economy is largely moot.
5/
7. Again, we can’t ever truly observe how many US dollars are in the system that are available to investors to capitalize the existing and future stock of assets or how fast that quantity is growing. We have proxies derived from key economic signals like growth and inflation.
6/
8. But we care deeply about the stock and flow of US dollars in the system because equity-like investors want just enough more US dollars for the price of their assets to get bid up, but not so many more dollars that owners of new assets make them poor on a relative basis…
7/
… and bond-like investors want just enough more US dollars in the system to get their money back from borrowers with interest, but not so many more dollars that their principal and interest payments lose purchasing power for goods, services, or other assets over time.
End. 8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THE MISGUIDED BELIEF BELOW IS THE #1 MOST DANGEROUS RISK TO YOUR WEALTH. THE ASSUMPTION THAT AN UP 20-60% YEAR AFTER A DOWN 20-60% YEAR LEAVES YOU WITH THE SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY IS THE MOST OFFENSIVE ASSUMPTION TO BASIC #MATH EVER. “VOLATILITY DRAG” IS REAL!
I’m biased b/c @42macro shares many of the same views — views that are in direct contention w/ popular views on Fin-Twit that do not pass the analytical rigor smell test.
One poorly researched, popular Fin-Twit view that has chapped my ass of late is the discussion about bond market liquidity. The bond market is fine. Bond prices are going down b/c investors have altered their views on the expected path of policy rates and stickiness of inflation.
If the bond market was experiencing a liquidity crisis like the UK, we’d see term premia gap higher. They are not. In fact, they are still NEGATIVE:
PROCESS THREAD: One of the things that sets the @42macro research process apart is I update our 125 to 150-slide monthly Macro Scouting Reports daily to prepare for client meetings. That is to ensure I don't miss any critical Macro updates like today's September JOLTS release. 1/
Obviously not every slide in the deck needs to be updated every day, as some only feature monthly or quarterly data. But I do go through every economic release, from every major economy, every single day, to ensure that I do not miss updating any slide that requires an update. 2/
While that sounds psychotic, you'll quickly learn from top buysiders like my mentor @Mike_Taylor1972 that this is the level of daily discipline that separates stud investors from those that fail on the buyside. That discipline is the difference in being UP YTD vs. DOWN 20-70%. 3/
COACHING THREAD: In response to the @NickTimiraos article I tweeted, I've had no less than two dozen retail investors tweet at me some version of the following:
"High credit card debt = the household sector balance sheet is not healthy nor is consumer spending resilient".
Ignoring the very obvious fact that anchoring on a NON-STATIONARY TIME SERIES like nominal credit card debt should not ever ever ever be used to form the basis of CYCLICAL (read: stationary) determinations, the reason high credit card debt it misses the mark is threefold... 2/
1. The US household sector is FLUSH with checkable Cash on both an absolute ($7.6tn), share-of-total-assets (5%), and share-of-disposable-personal-income (41%) basis. 2. Household debt is low, at only 88% of nominal disposable personal income (vs. 115% pre-GFC)... 3/
The stock market is making me nervous about a deeper pullback. It is trading over a percent below the Lower Boundary of its Probable Range, indicating it wants to at least break down to neutral from the perspective of our Volatility-Adjusted Momentum Signal (VAMS).
THREAD 1/
That said, the last time we saw such a deep downside deviation w/r/t the S&P 500’s Probable Range was on 5/12/21. At the risk of anchoring on an n-size of 1, investors can breathe a sigh of relief b/c that was not a sell signal on either a one-week or one-month forward basis.
2/
I watch Micro Caps $IWC and Frontier Markets $FM as ancillary signals of broader "risk off" conditions -- which our primary risk tools are disconfirming. Both are bearish VAMS, but neither has broken to new lows. That is a good thing for broader risk appetite until it isn’t.