The first campaign of Belisarius in Italy (535-540) was wildly successful, restoring most of the peninsula to Roman rule. Did the inhabitants of Italy welcome this? One way to answer that question is to visualize how Belisarius took cities in Italy. 🧵 #Roman#Byzantine#History
Today I introduce a small digital history mapping project that does just that. The image shown in the first tweet of this thread is an overview of the map. The map shows every city or region of Italy mentioned during the campaign by the historian Procopius of Caesarea. #dh
The pins for cities and regions are color coded based on how long it took Belisarius and the Roman army to take control of the location. Green represents no effort (instantaneous submission), yellow represents a short siege, orange a medium siege, and red a long siege.
To be even more specific, I counted a short siege as three days or less, a medium siege as a month or less, and anything over a month as a long siege. Each pin also contains a short summary of how the Romans took the location and a reference to the relevant passage in Procopius.
I will talk about what conclusions we might draw from this project in the remainder of this thread, but if you want to get into the map and play around with it yourself, here is the link straight to the project in Google Earth: earth.google.com/earth/d/1JZBBq…
The first thing that stands out when looking at the map is the overwhelming amount of green pins, signifying locations that instantly submitted to Roman forces when they showed up. Of 36 total pins, 29 are green.
The preponderance of green is even more extreme when you consider that three green pins (Samnium, Apulia, Calabria) represent entire regions rather than just individual cities. Each of these regions contained many important cities that surrendered to Belisarius without a fight.
The second thing that really stands out is the distribution of the red pins, which signify fortified cities with Gothic garrisons that resisted a Roman siege for more than a month. All of the red pins are to the north of Rome.
In almost all of Italy south of Rome, Belisarius and the Roman army were welcomed with open arms by Italian Romans. Naples, where some passionate civilian leaders and a stout Gothic garrison encouraged resistance to Belisarius, is the exception that proves this rule.
In general, the map demonstrates that resistance to Belisarius and the Roman army was concentrated in northern Italy, which not coincidentally was the region where most Gothic warriors were settled. It was the Goths, not the Italian Romans, who opposed Belisarius.
This map does not by itself prove that the majority of the inhabitants of Italy welcomed Belisarius, the Roman army, and the restoration of rule by the emperor Justinian. And attitudes perhaps changed the longer the war dragged on.
But, at least at the start of Belisarius' first campaign in Italy, the swift submission of the majority of the peninsula to Roman rule does seem like it should count for something. Fin.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Byzantines were Romans and the Byzantine Empire was the Roman Empire in the East. Let’s see what historical evidence we can bring to bear to prove these assertions. I present 20 examples from medieval primary sources in this mega thread. 🧵
The first group of sources demonstrates that emperors and elite historians of the empire itself referred to its peoples as Romans. This is pretty well known, but we’re going back to basics here, so let’s prove it through a variety of examples.
1. “Rome became subject to the Romans (῾Ρωμαίοις) again after a space of sixty years, on the ninth day of the last month, which is called ‘December’ by the Romans, in the eleventh year of the reign of the emperor Justinian.” -Procopius, Wars 5.14.14
Byzantine history enthusiasts often (with good reason) get irate about the Fourth Crusade. They should also celebrate the many conscientious objectors on the Fourth Crusade that refused to attack fellow Christians. This is an appreciation thread. 🧵
From the moment Enrico Dandolo, the Doge of Venice, proposed that the crusaders should attack the city of Zara, Geoffrey of Villehardouin reports: "There was much opposition."
The most articulate voice against the twisting of the Fourth Crusade is Guy, the Abbot of Vaux, who loudly proclaimed "My lords, on behalf of the Roman Pope I forbid you to lay siege to this city. For it is a Christian city and you are pilgrims."
Have you ever wanted more details about the Fourth Crusade’s attack on Constantinople in 1204? Two eyewitness accounts that are great to read together are Geoffrey of Villehardouin and Nicetas Choniates. Here are a few excerpts. 🧵
Geoffrey of Villehardouin (born around 1150) was a French knight and the Marshal of Champagne. He was one of the ambassadors to Venice who negotiated the deal for Venetian shipping of the crusade and he remained with the crusade until the end.
Nicetas Choniates (born around 1155) was a Roman civil official and governor of Philippopolis. He was an important author and historian in Nicaea, to which he fled after the conquest of Constantinople by the crusaders.
Welcome new followers! 👋 Allow me to introduce myself. I am a historian of the sixth-century Roman world and I post about all things Roman/Byzantine. My interests range from the founding of Rome to the fall of Constantinople.
In addition to posting about my own research, I also occasionally post about the field of Byzantine studies (or as I prefer to think of it, medieval Roman studies) and teaching as a university professor in the USA. Thanks for being here!
If you are new to this account, here are a few of my greatest threads. Was the Byzantine Empire Roman?
To celebrate my book's first birthday (released July 4 last year), I offer up a meditation on a curious little episode: the Vandal King Gelimer quoting the great refrain of Ecclesiastes: "Vanity of vanities, all is vanity." #Roman #Byzantine 🧵
Some background: At the command of Justinian (r. 527-565), the general Belisarius led a Roman army to crush the Vandals and restore North Africa and most of its surrounding islands to Roman control in a lightning campaign that lasted just six months (September 533-March 534).
(This is probably underselling the shocking rapidity of this victory, because all major combat operations were complete by December 533 [3 months], and everything after that was claiming far-flung outposts and forcing the besieged Vandal King Gelimer into submission.)
The Count of the Stable (Comes Stabuli, from which we derive "constable") was a late antique officer of the Roman imperial court responsible for levying horses and pack animals for government use. Although it sounds like a humble post, it was held by a number of famous Romans. 🧵
I have been writing on the Comes Stabuli recently and was astonished to learn that occupants of the office included the future emperor Valens (r. 364-378) and the famous generals Stilicho (d. 408) and Aetius (d. 454).
This is of particular interest to me since in the sixth century Belisarius held the title of ἄρχον τῶν βασιλικῶν ἱπποκόμων (Commander of the Imperial Grooms), which was presumably a variant form of the same office.