BJP MLA Surendra Singh in UP's Ballia claimed drinking cow urine has protected him from coronavirus. He also recommended people to 'drink cow urine with a glass of cold water'. (07.05.2021)
"I don't have #Covid because I drink cow urine every day": BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur
"Members of Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha drink cow urine to build immunity against COVID-19."
.@BJP4Bengal leader Narayan Chatterjee ARRESTED in #Kolkata for βunlawfullyβ making a traffic guard drink cow urine for preventing #Covid19. A written complain was filed against him.
BJP MLA Surendra Singh has claimed that consuming cow urine every morning on an empty stomach will guarantee protection from coronavirus.
More
Here...
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A missing persons complaint was registered by the family of an Ex-Army Serviceman Rajender Prasad soon after he went missing, they received a WhatsApp message 'Sar tan se judaa, sar tan se juda in Ajmer via Pakistan' & a logo of PFI. Thread π
Ex-Army Serviceman's family alleged that he had been kidnapped. His daughter, who'd filed the FIR, said that for about 10-15 days, some people belonging to a minority community were following him continuously and were pressurising him to join βtheir organisation".
Here's what Yati Narasinghanand Sarasvati had to say about Prithvi Raj Chauhan.
Several RW supporters including BJP members promoted and donated him because of his speeches targetting Muslims and Islam. Here's what he has to say about Prithviraj Chauhan comparing him to current Prime Minister.
Do read this comprehensive analysis by @akhmxt of Yati Narsinghanand's hate speeches online and offline. His conduct, which is in brazen violation of his bail conditions in the Haridwar Dharam Sansad case, continues to go unpunished. altnews.in/defying-bail-tβ¦
An alleged gangrape (on 16th oct) was reported in Ghaziabad on 18th of Oct, A day after an FIR, Police arrested all the five accused named in the FIR filed by 'victims' brother.
Ghaziabad Police didn't disclose the name of the accused in their video and written statement released on twitter. They didn't reveal the names of the accused when a journalist friend enquired. (may be because they were still investigating the claims).
It was also tweeted by Chairperson of Delhi Commission of Women. Many claims mentioned in the tweet didn't match with the claims in FIR copy.
All the Petitioners want is to wear a hijab! Is it too much to ask in a democracy? How is it against public order, morality or health? or even decency or against any other provision of Part III of the Constitution: Justice Dhulia #Hijab#HijabVerdict
"Under our Constitutional scheme, wearing a hijab should be simply a matter of choice. It may or may not be a matter of essential religious practice, but it still is, a matter of conscience, belief & expression," Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia. #HijabVerdict#Hijab
"If she wants to wear hijab, even inside her classroom, she cannot be stopped, if it is worn as a matter of her choice, as it may be the only way her conservative family will permit her to go to school & in those cases, her hijab is her ticket to education," Justice Dhulia #Hijab