Amazon-Future Arbitration Dispute mentioned in #SupremeCourt
Sr Adv Gopal Subhramnium: the termination application preferred by Future was to be taken first. The application was fully heard by the three member tribunal and on June 28 it was dismissed.
Subhramanium: the amendability claims were heard and now we are going for final hearing in arbitration on Nov 28 and now Future says they have a expert and expert is not available since he will be at Fifa World Cup @ Doha. Even then tribunal is willing to hear it
Subramaniam: now plea has been filed before Delhi HC to terminate the arbitration proceedings by Future and we told HC that #SupremeCourt passed the order after granting leave.
Subhramanium: HC entertained the petition nonetheless and we moved HC seeking stay of such proceedings under Article 227. SC had earlier taken a consent memo on record since arbitration was halted earlier too. HC has now extended time to file written submissions
Amazon: proceedings before the tribunal needs to go on milord
CJI DY Chandrachud: let us take a look at the papers
Subramaniam: Please see the first order and see para 3 where it is recorded that both parties submitted that tribunal will conduct the proceedings and pass an award. This was the statement of writ petitioner before this court. #AmazonVsFuture
CJI:What are you aggrieved by today?
Subhramanium:please see the impugned order and this territory is not open for the petitioner because there was an undertaking before the Supreme Court
CJI:So 227 plea has been filed in HC against order of tribunal to not terminate proceeding
Subhramanium: now they are requesting to scuttle the Nov 28 date for the arbitration proceeding
Sr Adv KV Vishwanathan for Future: over maintainability order was reserved by the HC as designated by HC. Statement of defence has also been submitted before the tribunal
Vishwanathan: we say that termination application not decided since they have kept it open to be heard with the main application..
CJI: They have amended their claims
Vishwanathan: we submitted that we come within the exceptional circumstances which was very narrow
CJI: But arbitration has to go on and a joint memo was submitted by the parties before this court. You have also submitted your defence.
Vishwanathan: HC is looking at if SC order was complied with and do these amendments violate the character of the transaction
CJI: We will not pressurise the HC judge. We will clarify there shall be no interdicting the proceeding before the arbitral tribunal. if the HC holds it is not maintainable, arbitration cannot go on, but if you fail before HC you have to go before the tribunal #amazonvsfuture
Subhramanium: the HC judge at the end suggested that please mention this before the Supreme Court because termination application was dismissed by the 64 page order by the tribunal
CJI: Subject to decision of the HC, you will not seek time before the tribunal. We will say arbitral tribunal proceedings to commence from Nov 28 and that is why it has the mandate to complete the proceeding, however the mandate and amendment has been challenged..
CJI: ordered by the SC should not be rendered a nullity, that is our concern #amazonvsfuture
CJI DY Chandrachud to Future: The fact you will move 227 plea was not within the contemplation and you cannot keep stultifying the proceeding before the arbitral tribunal and this is just a ploy to delay the proceeding #amazonvsfuture
CJI to Amazon: there is no stay of arbitral proceeding
CJI to Future: all ploys by well heeled parties to delay the arbitration proceeding. Your client is trying to be too clever by half. #amazonvsfuture
CJI to Future: This is an international arbtration and this is how the courts of this country will bring repute to the process. We will not let the arbitration process be stultified. we will list the matter for next Friday and order accordingly #amazonvsfuture
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#Breaking A special bench of Delhi High Court headed by Justice Siddharth Mridul says it has to consider whether it would be able to hear Delhi riots bail appeals or not. #DelhiHighCourt#DelhiRiots
Eight bail appeals including those of Sharjeel Imam, Khalid Saifi, Ishrat Jahan and several others is pending before the bench.
The bench also comprises Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar. #DelhiHighCourt#DelhiRiots
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by the National Testing Agency against Madras HC order which directed authorities concerned to award 4 grace marks to an unsuccessful SC aspirant for MBBS course for prescribing a wrong question in NEET conducted by the NTA
SG Tushar Mehta: there is a short question by the effect is cascading!
SG: We have quoted our rule. if a question was found to be incorrect by us or dropped 4 marks was to be attended to those who attempted the question. in this Q he did not attend it at all
CJI: There were 5 choices for this question. but there was no such option at all
Effect of Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association's decision to abstain from work to protest Justice Nikhil Kariel's proposed transfer could be seen in Gujarat High Court today, with most courtrooms wearing a deserted look
Chief Justice's court hall is empty
Sibal: this is a prosecution by the state police. Special bench was formed and Justice Ajay Rastogi was added to it.
Justice DY Chandrachud: I have a feeling an order was passed on this mentioning item. Please call one of the staff members. I cannot say anything off the cuff
CJI: If I am mistaken and no order was on this, we will ofcourse hear you.
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear separate applications moved by #BhimaKoregaon accused Gautam Navlakha, in which he alleged delay to implement SC's order granting him #housearrest, and the NIA's plea to cancel his house arrest due to bias in medical records among other grounds
SG Tushar Mehta: NIA has filed an IA and it was filed at 6:05 pm. CJI had passed an order yesterday asking both applications to be listed before you #GautamNavlakha
#SatyendarJain is not entitled to the benefit of bail having regard to the twin conditions provided in Section 45 of the PMLA — Special Judge, Rouse Avenue Courts.
#SatyendarJain was actually involved in concealing the proceeds of crime by giving cash to the Kolkata based entry operators…By this process, the proceeds of crime to the tune of 1/3rd of Rs 4.61 Crore has been laundered — Special Judge.