#DiedSuddenlydocumentary#DiedSuddenly#vaccineswork The video is out on rumble and, is essentially a list of people who appeared to have fainted on TV - where the narrator attributes every cause to immunization. Here's the debunk.🧵(1/8)
Sorting out fainting requires a systematic approach from your doc, not a Sherry Tenpenny testimonial. You would expect an architect to systematically figure out why a bridge collapsed. You would expect a car mechanic to systematically figure out why a sound is happening.(2/8)
Same applies to a physician. A physician has never been allowed to declare by royal decree that someone died due to an immunization. A detailed investigation has always been mandatory. Lets look at some of the incorrect attributions they used: (3/8)
The basketball player here tested positive for COVID BEFORE the immunization was available. Viral myocarditis is a well known cause of collapsing athletes. We restrict exercise after myocarditis for this precise reason. (4/8)
The authors of the video are really only interested in their narrative. Mike Lindell and Sherry Tenpenny are most certainly not coming to help you if get hospitalized with an MI or post-COVID blood clot. Keep your eye on reliable COVID information. (8/8)
#DiedSuddenlydocumentary#DiedSuddenly#vaccineswork The video is out on rumble and, is essentially a list of people who appeared to have fainted on TV - where the narrator attributes every cause to immunization. Here's the debunk. pt2🧵
The other part of the video is embalmers discussing clots (the rest of the video is recycled claims elsewhere that would make an endless thread, so I'm focusing on the biology part). One part of fundamental blood biology: blood no longer moving is a trigger for clot.
100% of dead bodies have clots (not necessarily everywhere) but the video advances a hypothesis that this is not normal. White clots contain more vWF, collagen, and platelets than red blood cells (sciencedirect.com/science/articl…) .
However, the analysis presented in the video makes no effort to systematically analyze the composition of the clots purported to be abnormal in the dissections/ autopsies/ cases prepared in the funeral homes. One would expect a trained pathologist to try to do this.
An example of a research group who tries to do this sysematically is this one pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34592611/. Skipping over the Steve Kirsch monologues and dramatic interviews - the only conclusion that can be made with the scant evidence is that clots were found.
Should we study the clots more? Sure! A rumble video supported by the Stew Peters network hardly qualifies as a formal mechanistic study though.
PS: I have no interest in commenting on the new world order, schemes on depopulation, and the rest of the non-medical information that fills the rest of the documentary. I've made this thread to focus solely on the biological claims.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#vaccineswork the Thai Pfizer #vaccination#myocarditis is making the rounds again because it has passed peer review and become a publication... naturally the usual actors are using it to stir up fear again, so lets deep dive into what the study did and its real conclusions.🧵
Two academic Thai hospitals decided to study the potential incidence of postvaccine myocarditis in the prospective fashion in Thai school age children. They studied 301 children, and got EKG/ labs/ echo/ and some cardiac MRIs to look for myocarditis. (2/10)
@P_McCulloughMD chooses to intentionally gloss over the statistical methods of the article by quoting the percentage of cardiovascular manifestations... remember it is very important to try and read beyond only the abstract to see how the number was calculated. (3/10)
#cardiotwitter#vaccineswork@DrAseemMalhotra has made yet again, really elementary errors in reading comprehension that, in a normal cardiology training program, a registrar would get pulled aside and get their sanity checked.
The British Heart Foundation released a report describing excess deaths, numbering > 30 000. The actual report is here - bhf.org.uk/-/media/files/… . First rule of fact checking - try to view primary source data if you can. @DrAseemMalhotra clearly didn't.
It is known internationally that British NHS waiting times have become a significant issue - and while the causes are multifactorial, a big issue is staffing/ retention. The British government has a big, big problem on its hands at the moment.
. @FLDeptofHealth tried to analyze deaths after COVID vaccination starting from their rollout till June 2022. 🧵(1/9)
Their group created a non-peer reviewed study which was just published on the website, by searching people who received vaccination via FLSHOT (the vaccine registry), death records data, and the Florida Merlin database (a previously established database for reportable epi ).(2/9)
The statistical method is the self-controlled case series method, which basically means you compare subjects to themselves while tracking what happens after exposure to your event of interest (reasonable method to use to study this issue). However, several biases exist.(3/9)
On the infant ingestion of mRNA: we ingest picogram quantities of foreign bacterial and viral bits (including genomes) all the time. The only way you could legitimately avoid that is to live in an actual bubble like some unfortunate kids with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency.
The GI tract has multiple enzymatic self defense methods to chew up foreign genomic material. The lipid material has to survive digestive acids, which it is very poorly capable of doing.
GI tract viruses only exist because they have tough outer protein coatings specifically evolved for this purpose. These are the biggest reasons why mRNA vaccines are not delivered orally.
#vaccineswork Aseem Malhotra, a British adult cardiologist and TV personality, has come out with an article railing against COVID vaccinations. It has multiple logical errors, conflicts of interest, and citations of dubious quality. Lets discuss. 🧵
(1/11) as someone who has previously published, we generally do not write articles for journals with a completely different main theme. He wrote an immuno-cardio-epi crossover article and put it in a diabetes journal. He doesn't acknowledge that he is on the board of editors.
(2/11) it is extremely rare to collaborate with anonymous co-authors unless that co-authors' life is on the line should their identity be revealed (or some other extremely extenuating circumstance). As an academic you should be able to stand by your work and respond to critique.
#COVID#vaccineswork OK, lets analyze this study properly. This study out of Thailand used the prospective cohort method to attempt to characterize the rate of myocarditis and its clinical/ lab/ EKG/ echo findings in a group of > 300 students. 🧵1/9
The findings as presented in the tweet are a distortion by someone who did not take into account what normal pediatric EKG findings are; the study listed above preprints.org/manuscript/202… did not take pre-vaccination EKGs. (2/9)
The structure of the study was essentially, enroll some students, give informed consent for vaccination, and see what lab/ imaging/ EKG findings exist after COVID vaccination #2. They also calculated an estimated rate of myocarditis based upon this cohort. (3/9)