Early thoughts on #Twitter🐦 vs #Mastodon🐘:
✳️ 🐦 value:noise (v:n) was 1:10, now ~ 1:30; great stuff is here but it's diluted. It's like a crossword puzzle
✳️ 🐘 v:n ? Lots of good stuff, less GREAT stuff. Like a crossword puzzle that's all words but u only care about some
✳️ 🐦 value:noise (v:n) was 1:10, now ~ 1:30; great stuff is here but it's diluted. It's like a crossword puzzle
✳️ 🐘 v:n ? Lots of good stuff, less GREAT stuff. Like a crossword puzzle that's all words but u only care about some
✳️ 500 characters is too many
✳️ 🐦 has a TON of advertisements
✳️ 🐘 may improve if more people migrate
✳️ 🐦 having a content algorithm was (is?) probably SUPER useful; will this be eroded? Is having any algorithm better than none (🐘 = the latter)
✳️ 🐦 has a TON of advertisements
✳️ 🐘 may improve if more people migrate
✳️ 🐦 having a content algorithm was (is?) probably SUPER useful; will this be eroded? Is having any algorithm better than none (🐘 = the latter)
✳️ If I was just getting started w/ a platform would choose 🐘 > 🐦; @ this point 🐦 probably more valuable (agree w/ @PaulSaxMD point #5 in this great post: blogs.jwatch.org/hiv-id-observa…)
For me, 🐦 is most valuable when used tactically/intentionally.
For several years (after reading this book: calnewport.com/books/digital-…) have tried to limit use to only 5 minutes twice a day (often failing)
Tactical use now given the ⬆️ed noise:value ratio prob more important
For several years (after reading this book: calnewport.com/books/digital-…) have tried to limit use to only 5 minutes twice a day (often failing)
Tactical use now given the ⬆️ed noise:value ratio prob more important
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
