Ever got told to "tell a story" in your article? Including an element of tension is how you do it!
β Clearly describe the problem that your study is solving
#2: Ignoring the broader perspective
It's easy to get bogged down in details when you're writing your paper, but it won't be obvious to your reader how your research relates to the field and society if you don't spell it out.
β Explain the broader implications of your research
#3: Too brief (or non-existent) discussion
It's not enough to report your findings. We want to know how you interpret them!
β Include a Discussion section where you discuss whether your results agree with the literature and what broader conclusions you can draw.
#4: Not mentioning the purpose of your experiments
Most researchers describe what they did and what they found but not WHY they did it, which makes it hard for the reader to follow your argument.
β Explain the purpose of each experiment/analysis presented
#5: Using over-complicated language
Don't use long and complicated sentences. They don't make you sound like an expert but hinder your reader to easily follow your argument.
β Use simple and clear language in your paper.
TL;DR: The 5 most common mistakes I see researchers make in their papers
#1: Neglecting tension
#2: Ignoring the broader perspective
#3: Too brief (or non-existent) discussion
#4: Not mentioning the purpose of your experiments
#5: Using over-complicated language
If you found this thread was helpful, then watching my free writing training is the perfect next step for you!
πIt's only about an hour long and will change the way you write your papers.
π± In 1 sentence, hook your reader describing a problem in your field that your research is contributing to solving. Every reader of the journal should understand this sentence.
#2 Provide context needed to understand your study
π³ In 1-3 sentences, give the reader any background they need to understand the motivation of your study. Clearly state the specific problem that your study solves.
π¬ Split up figures if you are finding yourself communicating two or more key take-aways per figure (panel).
Step 2: Pick the most suitable plot type
π Whether you choose a bar chart, scatter plot, line, heat map or histogram depends on what conveys your message in the simplest and most accurate way.
Mistake 1β£: Providing paragraphs of background information
π‘ Use the Introduction section for context. In the Discussion section, any mentioned background info needs to be discussed together with your own findings.
Mistake 2β£: Expecting the reader to have read all previous section
π‘ Tell the whole story by restating the problem you are solving with your study so that readers understand the motivation for your research.
#1: Have a clearly defined central message that runs through the WHOLE manuscript
β‘οΈ Check each figure panel, each subsection, each paragraph and each sentence to make sure they're aligned with your central message. π«
#2: Implement a consistent structure in your manuscript
β‘οΈ Make sure you aren't repeating information at various places in your manuscript, such as sharing background information on your research topic in both your Introduction AND Discussion. π§