Navy General Board Profile picture
Nov 25, 2022 7 tweets 4 min read Read on X
The Colorado class dreadnought USS Washington under construction. The details of her multi-layer torpedo defense system are easily seen.

The United States enjoyed somewhat of a significant advantage in warship development at this time.
Most major powers (such as Britain and Germany) were locked in the dreadnought race. In an effort to outproduce the competition, the implementation of new features was somewhat hamstrung by the rush to get ships into serve as quickly as possible.
The US Navy on the other hand, could take a more leisurely approach (Not to mention take advantage of data coming from foreign experiences).

Extensive testing of various components was conducted. This was especially true for tank testing of underwater protection schemes.
This led to the development of the highly effective defense systems.

The US was able to determine features such as optimal distance between bulkheads, the best material to fill them (Air vs liquid), the thickness of the bulkhead, organization of said bulkeads, etc.
Further aided by other things (such as the powerplant and tight subdivision), the final Standard Battleships were ahead of the competition as far as underwater protection went.

Even by the Second World War, they remained competitive with the newest designs.
It's not to say the US had superior workmanship. Merely, they had the freedom to design and incorporate new features at a generous pace.

The nature of the Standard Battleships to be incremental improvements over their predecessors was also a likely factor that drove development
Overall, I'm starting to gain an appreciation for the Standards. While not quite gaining the respect of their peers, they were technologically interesting designs that had an impact on US design through the Second World War.

#fridaymorning #Friday #UnitedStates #USA #History

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Navy General Board

Navy General Board Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thegeneralboard

Jul 24
Battlecruisers in the US Navy: Part 2

So let's assume that the US Navy did produce it's Lexington class battlecruisers in their original configuration.

How might they have influenced the US Navy during the interwar years and into World War 2? Image
There likely would have been no Alaska class cruisers for one.

With six large capital ships to patrol the sea lanes, there would be less impetus for the development of the large cruiser proposals in the 1930s. Image
As a side note, this might have even caused Germany to hesitate on the Deutschland class.

The Renown class/HMS Hood were known to be the major threats to the class due to their speed and power. Having the threat of the Lexington class in the Atlantic would be added to this. Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 17
On the post about the Yamato class and torpedoes, someone had pointed out that they always seemed to take on roughly 3,000 tons of flooding after they were initially torpedoed by aircraft or submarines.

Perfect because I wanted to talk about a design flaw in the Yamato design. Image
Japanese designers went above and beyond in the design of the Yamato class, stretching their capabilities to the limit to produce a very advanced warship.

Notably, the Yamato class used plenty of full scale testing in its design. This was especially true for the armor design. Image
Gunnery tests against Tosa showed that large calibre shells retained enough momentum to travel for some distance underwater, allowing them to bypass the main armor belt entirely by going under it. Image
Read 13 tweets
Apr 12
I don't know who needs to hear this, but Bismarck was sunk by the Royal Navy, not scuttled.

I wanted to do a post on the torpedo protection of the Yamato class, but recent events required a change of plans. Image
There seems to be this weird, persistent belief that the Royal Navy could not sink it and the Germans scuttled it.

Some of the more extreme takes seem to suggest that Bismarck was in great shape prior to her being scuttled. Image
The facts of the matter is that the Royal Navy quickly "mission-killed" Bismarck, negating her use as a fighting vessel.

This allowed them to close the distance and begin pummeling her at close range. Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 10
If you think Bismarck supporters are crazy with the "It took an entire British fleet to sink it", Let me introduce you to the Japanese equivalent when discussing the Yamato class.

This picture is tossed around way more than it should, being inaccurate and without proper context Image
The problem I have with this picture, and the loss of the Yamato class for that matter, is that people don't understand the progression of damage.

They almost seem to assume that the ship's were perfectly fine until that final hit that sent them under. Image
The fact of the matter is that US Navy aircraft continued hitting the battleships long after they were done and sinking. Some of those bombs and torpedoes were gratuitous at best.

Instead, the proper question is what straw was it that broke the camel's back? Image
Read 15 tweets
Oct 28, 2023
Yes and No and that answer only applies to the specific time period.

Tumblehome has its original benefits that made it attractive to designers (reduced top weight, better maneuvering in restricted areas, etc).
Image
In turns of protection, tumblehome was also effective in countering gunfire at close ranges (approaching horizontally). So much so that the US Navy designed a battleship that returned to a tumblehome hull reminiscent of a civil war ironclad. Image
However, gunnery ranges ultimately increased so that shells approached at steeper angles. Here, they negated the slope of tumblehome hulls.

This meant that armor that inclined outwards was superior. Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 20, 2023
The unsung heroes among the United States cruisers during the Second World War were the Brooklyn class light cruisers.

The impact of these cruisers extends far beyond their service. Their very design influenced all future cruisers of the US Navy. Image
The Brooklyn class cruiser introduced the long flushdeck style hull (increasing structural strength and stiffness) that would be used on future heavy and light cruisers.

The safer location of the stern was chosen to carry aircraft and their equipment (rather than amidships). Image
Other features were also introduced for cruiser designs. The propulsion system was arranged into the unit system. The final two ships of the class would even introduce the 5"/38 guns in twin mounts. Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(