Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
Martin Dockrell Profile picture
Twitter logo
Nov 25 • 13 tweets • 4 min read
My talk at #CSFT2022
Et je n’avais pas besoin du gard de corps non plus!
@addict38 @PrDautzenberg @ADLERMarion3

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Martin Dockrell

Martin Dockrell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SwitchFinder

Martin Dockrell Profile picture
Nov 23
Image
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Martin Dockrell Profile picture
Oct 21
I might as well tweet the @KingsNRG tweetables on #nicotine #vaping in #England as a thread.
Read 10 tweets
Martin Dockrell Profile picture
Sep 29
#Nicotine #Vaping in #England report 2022: a thread

Thanks to the amazing team at @KingsNRG for this epic report. #NVIE

@KingsIoPPN @KingsAddictions 1/18 Image
2/18 #NVIE Image
3/18 #NVIE Image
Read 19 tweets
Martin Dockrell Profile picture
Mar 18, 2019
@MauriceGSwanson @ATHRA_AU @MailOnline @PHE_uk 1/... Hello Maurice. I’m always interested in the basis and motivation for disputing ‘at least 95% less harmful’ as a basis for communicating relative risks of vaping Vs smoking. Let’s start with the basis.
@MauriceGSwanson @ATHRA_AU @MailOnline @PHE_uk 2/ The figure is (expressed as at likely to be less than 5% of the harm) was also the funding of @RCPLondon in #NicotineWithoutSmoke
@MauriceGSwanson @ATHRA_AU @MailOnline @PHE_uk @RCPLondon 3/ @theNASEM declined to put a number on it but found, on the available evidence (what else is there?) likely to be far less harmful, although more research is needed (when isn’t there?)
Read 8 tweets
Martin Dockrell Profile picture
Feb 1, 2019
When the weaknesses have more weaknesses than the study they critique. Here’s a few:
1. The previous RCTs also found EC more effective, even though the devices were obsolete when the studies were published. The effect size was smaller because the devices weren’t as good.
2. The ‘highly selected group’ were smokers who want to quit. This is entirely normal for a stop smoking survey. Who else would you recruit? Non smokers or smokers who don’t want to quit?
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(