Javier Blas Profile picture
Nov 28 3 tweets 1 min read
As I said earlier, while oil plunges, do keep an eye on European electricity markets (UK and France).

Despite seasonally mild weather, the lack of wind is forcing a high gas burn, sending day-ahead wholesale baseload prices pretty high, and peakload even higher | #EnergyCrisis
UK wholesale power prices for tomorrow evening (5-6pm) will be very, very high at ~£1,100 per MWh. That's the 15th highest ever price for an evening since 2010.

National Grid ESO is flagging it may activate for tomorrow its new Demand Flexibility Service to balance the market.
UK National Grid **cancels** the need for its electricity-saving "Demand Flexibility Service" for tomorrow | #EnergyCrisis

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Javier Blas

Javier Blas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JavierBlas

Nov 26
OIL MARKET: Washington eases its oil sanctions on Venezuela, allowing Chevron (for the next 6 months) to pump crude in the Latin American nation and export it into the United States. A major shift in the White House policy | #OOTT #Venezuela $CVX 🇻🇪 ⛽️ 🇺🇸
The easing of the oil sanctions come as the Venezuelan government and the democratic opposition re-started talks, brokered by Norway and Mexico. The talks between the two sides are the first direct contact in a year | #OOTT
A bit of extra context: before the sanctions were imposed, the joint-ventures between Chevron and PdVSA, the Venezuelan state-owned oil company, pumped about 200,000 b/d. So that's probably as much extra crude as we can expect -- and that will require time, money and expertise
Read 4 tweets
Nov 20
FULL DOCUMENT: The #COP27 political-policy text (aka, “cover”) is full of diplomatic language gymnastics. Note, for example, the reference to “low-emission” energy to mean gas and nuclear (and probably carbon-captured oil). Full comuniqué is here: unfccc.int/sites/default/… 1/4🧵
A couple of additional points: no advance from COP26 on coal: the COP27 document simply reiterates the Glasgow wording: coal remains a phase down, not a phase-out (and, in reality, coal demand is going up, on track for a record high both in 2022-23, surpassing the 2013 peak) 2/4
#COP27 doesn’t move the needle on fossil fuels either, simply copy-and-pasting COP26 language on the need to phase-out “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies” (but, in reality, subsidies are up!!).

Early attempts to call for a phase down of fossil fuel *consumption* were killed 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Nov 5
When @jfarchy and I wrote in 'The World for Sale' the story of how Marc Rich inserted himself in the 1980s into a gov-to-gov oil deal between Iran and Burundi, we thought we were telling a commodity deal from a long gone buccaneering era (see below a fragment from the book) | 1/5
To trade oil with Iran and Burundi, Rich created a mysterious outfit called the Compagnie Burundaise de Commerce, (or Cobuco for short), directed by an enterprising employee who went by the pseudonym Monsieur Ndolo | 2/5
It turns out that the heirs of Rich (today's Glencore) were doing the same 40 years later: insert themselves into a similar gov-to-gov oil deal (paying bribes included). The only thing that changed was the countries: this time it was Nigeria and Malawi; the rest was similar | 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Oct 27
The annual @IEA's World Energy Outlook is out.

It present 3 *scenarios* for energy supply and demand to 2050. In all, it sees fossil fuel consumption will hit a peak in a few years, but the trajectory after that is very different in each scenario | 1/4
iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/7e42db9…
The report says that "the proximate cause of the crisis was Russia’s invasion of Ukraine". But it adds that "pressure on markets was visible before February 2022". Per the IEA: "The key underlying imbalance, which had been some years in the making, relates to
investment" 2/4
The IEA says investment in green energy isn't growing fast enough, and has only seen a notable acceleration over the last couple of years. Meanwhile, investment in fossil fuel has dropped over the last few years while oil, gas, and coal demand has kept growing 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Oct 14
A few thoughts about the White House's claim that several OPEC nations communicated to Washington "privately that they also disagreed with the Saudi decision [to cut oil production], but felt coerced to support Saudi’s direction" #OOTT 1/6
Over the last three years, we have witnessed at least two instances when OPEC+ nations disagreed with Saudi Arabia, and were willing to have a very public fight about it (Mexico in April 2020, and UAE in July 2021). We saw nothing of that sort this time | #OOTT 2/6
The OPEC+ meeting in Vienna was very short, suggesting that ministers had already received instructions for a deal from their capitals, and everyone was onboard. If anyone disagreed, it didn't disagree so much as to have a fight. That suggests internal consensus | #OOTT 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Aug 3
OPEC+ agreed to a tiny oil output hike of 100,000 b/d for Sept, sending Brent back above $100 a barrel.

The increase (the 2nd smallest hike in the cartel's history, only behind one in 1986) comes despite President Biden's trip to Saudi Arabia | #OOTT 1/4 bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The OPEC+ 100,000 b/d output hike compares to an expectation in Washington only a few days ago that Saudi Arabia would lead the cartel to boost production by 400,000-500,000 b/d. For weeks, US officials have said they expected positive steps at the Aug 3 OPEC+ meeting | #OOTT 2/4
The OPEC+ increase isn't real, either, as most member are already pumping at their maximum capacity. Only Saudi Arabia and the UAE can increase. If they adhere to their quotas, the 100,000 b/d translates in an extra 26,000 b/d for Riyadh and 8,000 b/d for Abu Dhabi | #OOTT 3/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(