Elon Musk — The Twitter Files on free speech suppression soon to be published on Twitter itself. The public deserves to know what really happened…
A secret deal with the devil:
Back in 2016 Apple caved to China's CCP demands and because a tool of the communist state. Apple is helping China with technology and investments which are enabling the CCP to control its population.
#FreedomOfSpeech is very subjective these days. For Apple for instance, since FoxConn manufacturers most of the iPhones, Xi Jinping can influence Tim Cook heavily about Twitter on iPhones. Also there might be domestic pressure from the establishment on banning Twitter 🤷♂️
@naval is 💯 true on this. If Twitter was a Chinese company, Apple wouldn’t dare even talk about deleting the app publicly… forget about threatening to delete the app
Thanks Elon for bringing transparency back to social media. Thanks Elon for not changing America into China.
Tim Cook and Xi Jinping are so worried about the mass protests in China…
Not because of peoples freedoms or their well-being, they’re worried about iPhone manufacturing and losing control of the situation in #China #chinaprotest#chinalockdown
ALL TRUTH IS CONTROLLED BY THEM, EVERYTHING ELSE IS MIS-INFORMATION & DISINFORMATION
Kevin McCarthy says government should stop going after Twitter and Elon Musk for him standing for your #FreedomOfSpeech
If anything government should enable him because of the first amendment
EU wants Elon Musk to ditch his arbitrary approach and follow their #PrescriptionApproach for freedom of speech. They need #ExtensiveAudit of the platform as well.
PRESCRIBED FREEDOM OF SPEECH ISN’T FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Apple threatening Elon Musk to boot Twitter off its AppStore goes much deeper than you think. NSA unwarranted surveillance, their information choke points etc.
Most apps die once they’re off the AppStore, but Elon Musk could create a StarLink supported store of his own
Netflix’s Reed Hastings says… Elon Musk is the bravest and most creative leader on the planet. He’s trying to build a platform to help people with #FreedomOfSpeech in Twitter. Stop nitpicking him and give him a break.
The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files reeks of hypocrisy and deliberate obfuscation, raising serious questions about their motives. Trump, along with Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, made bold promises to release the full scope of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, fueling public expectations of transparency. Instead, they delivered a curated batch of already public information to a select group of pro-Trump influencers, sidestepping broad disclosure. This move, cloaked as a step toward openness, was a performative stunt that betrayed the spirit of their pledge. The administration’s pivot to claiming no “client list” exists, after years of speculation they themselves amplified, feels like a convenient reversal to shut down further scrutiny. This pattern of overpromising and underdelivering suggests a calculated effort to control the narrative, possibly to shield influential figures—potentially including Trump himself—from damaging revelations.
The contradiction surrounding Epstein’s death further erodes trust in the administration’s account. For years, Trump allies and conservative voices, including those now in power, fueled conspiracy theories that Epstein was murdered, pointing to the reported failure of video cameras at the Manhattan jail where he died. Now, the same administration claims to have clear video evidence showing no one entered or exited Epstein’s cell, confirming his suicide. This abrupt shift from questioning the official narrative to endorsing it—without releasing the footage for public verification—smacks of opportunism. It’s plausible that the administration is leveraging this newfound “evidence” to tie up loose ends and discourage further investigation into Epstein’s network, which could implicate powerful individuals. The refusal to share this alleged video only deepens suspicions that the administration is more interested in closing the case than uncovering the truth.
The possibility that the Trump administration is compromised by Epstein-related evidence cannot be dismissed. Trump’s documented ties to Epstein, including multiple flights on his private jet and their shared social circles in the 1990s, place him uncomfortably close to the scandal. The administration’s reluctance to release unredacted files, coupled with the selective distribution of documents to loyalists, suggests they may be suppressing information that could expose Trump or his allies. By hyping the release of the files and then delivering a dud, they appease their base’s demand for action while ensuring no new, incriminating details surface. This bait-and-switch tactic, paired with their sudden insistence on a tidy suicide narrative, points to a deeper fear: that the Epstein files contain evidence that could politically or legally devastate the administration. The hypocrisy lies in their public posturing as truth-seekers while their actions betray a desperate need to keep certain truths buried.
Democrats are compromised by Epstein evidence
Republicans are compromised by same evidence
They’re just blaming each other for political points to get elected… as soon as they get elected, they claim there’s no client list, Epstein killed himself
Biden’s border policies leaned toward massive illegal immigration cloaked as humanitarianism to make USA a permanent blue state. Biden was aiming to reverse Trump’s hardline measures with a focus on legal pathways and reduced enforcement. He suspended the "Remain in Mexico" policy, ended family separations, and expanded parole programs, allowing more migrants to enter legally, such as through the CBP One app or humanitarian exemptions for specific nationalities. However, this shift led to record-high border crossings, with over 7 million encounters from 2021 to 2024, overwhelming border facilities and local communities. This lax approach enabled cartels to exploit vulnerabilities, increasing human trafficking and drug smuggling, notably fentanyl, which contributed to over 100,000 overdose deaths annually. Open borders also strained public safety, with unvetted migrants linked to isolated but high-profile crimes, eroding trust in federal oversight and fueling national security concerns.
Trump’s border strategy, by contrast, prioritized deterrence through aggressive enforcement and physical barriers. His "Remain in Mexico" policy forced asylum seekers to wait outside the U.S., while Title 42 rapidly expelled migrants, reducing illegal crossings to historic lows by 2020. The border wall, though incomplete, disrupted smuggling routes, and his zero-tolerance stance led to fewer unaccompanied minors at the border. These measures bolstered security by limiting unchecked migration and cartel influence, but they came at a cost: family separations sparked humanitarian outcry, and rapid expulsions bypassed asylum rights, potentially endangering vulnerable migrants. While Trump’s policies projected strength, deterring illegal entry and easing pressure on border resources, they risked alienating global allies and fostering a perception of cruelty, complicating America’s moral standing without fully resolving migration’s root causes.
There has never been a war in history where 80% of the country has been destroyed, 100% of the population displaced, and 50% of the deaths are children.
NO COUNTRY CAN MATCH THE MILITARY MIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES 🇺🇸
The B-2 bomber just flew into Iran, struck 3 nuclear sites & returned — without even being detected. With 44 hours of continuous flight, 18,000+ km range, and a $2.1 billion price tag
The media and government often distort information about health and food, prioritizing profit and control over public well-being. Media outlets, driven by advertising revenue, frequently promote processed foods and fad diets while downplaying their risks. For instance, sugary cereals are marketed as "heart-healthy" due to added vitamins, despite their high sugar content contributing to obesity and diabetes. Similarly, government dietary guidelines have historically pushed low-fat diets, ignoring evidence that healthy fats, like those in avocados or nuts, are essential for brain and heart health. These guidelines often stem from lobbying by powerful food industries, like dairy or grain conglomerates, which influence policy to favor their products over nutrient-dense whole foods. This creates a cycle where misleading narratives shape public perception, leaving people confused about what’s truly healthy.
Beyond misinformation, the media and government sometimes suppress inconvenient truths to maintain economic or political stability. For example, during the rise of industrial farming, both entities championed pesticide-laden produce as safe and necessary to feed growing populations, despite early studies linking chemicals like DDT to cancer and environmental damage. Meanwhile, alternative health practices, like fasting or organic farming, are often dismissed as fringe or unscientific, even when evidence supports their benefits. The media amplifies these biases by sensationalizing stories that align with corporate or government agendas, such as vilifying raw milk while ignoring its potential benefits for gut health. This deliberate obfuscation erodes trust and keeps people dependent on a system that profits from chronic illness and confusion.