Neither were members told the money pot was empty.
An entirely dishonest move.
Conference is the decision making body of the Party, by failing to mention this, they effectively sidestep party scrutiny & party democracy- they bring decision making in house (again).
Why does this matter…?
In 2020, Mandu appointed not one, not two, but three paid deputies (for a Party of only 7000).
These positions had no clear job spec, zero accountability/appraisal or targets built in the contracts.
Their 2 year term expired shortly before conference.
You would think conference would be the perfect opportunity to appraise their effectiveness (media appearances/campaigns/elections/work completed/value for money).
Again, no mention at conference.
Members asked, and again we were met with silence.
Had this been discussed & financial reports submitted we wonder what members would have said?
We'd also like to credit @BPAS1968 and @PregnantScrewed for their incredible campaigns which WEP took part in but now seem to be taking credit for
An email to branch officers today says they have lost a 'small number' of members due to their stance on self-ID. I think we know it's more than a few. And beyond numbers, the calibre of women who can no longer give WEP their time and money is beyond incredible. What a loss.
We wanted to save WEP. They locked us out and smeared us. Now all the feminists have gone, they're left with holding their cap out to the gender ideology campaigners. What a betrayal of women.
@ManduReid's leadership has will sadly become knownfor dismissing expertise & the majority view of Party members on self ID.
The Party's assembly was clear in its support of single-sex spaces, yet #wep#groundhogday brings back the same tired motion that was rejected previously
Whew! This is Sarah taking over the tweets from our wonderful A. She has done a grand job launching #RespectMySex and speaking to @WEP_UK candidates. Unfortunately, this has also filled our mentions with some grim content... (1/7)
I just want to say thank you to all our feminist sisters slogging it out here in Twitter, it's not always an easy place to be. Nobody wants to be dealing with porn-soaked replies about sex toys whilst making the kids' lunch... (2/7)
Many of us are #VAWG survivors, of course, and being political and opinionated whilst being female is often enough reason to be targeted by rank misogyny. Sometimes even from other women... (3/7)
1] Disappointing to see @TabithaMortonWE stating that Sani's What Is A Woman is a 'MUST read'
The article starts with a bizarre interpretation of Bouvoir, & suggests 'British Feminism' has toxic corners when it comes to women discussing their own sex
@TabithaMortonWE The article uses images of the Hijra. India ruled in 2014 that a third gender marker & 3RD spaces, so no, this is not the 'corners of British feminism' discussing this
Many Hijra are openly gay men because of Indian homophobia (homosexuality is illegal)
2]
'Out of 837 submissions there are only six (that I can find and I did trawl through all of them but could well have missed one), from organisations that work within the male violence against women movement'
Women-only spaces provide a physically and emotionally safe environment that is vital to survivors’ recovery and empowerment after experiencing domestic and sexual violence and other forms of violence against women and Girls