Trevor Tombe Profile picture
Nov 29, 2022 16 tweets 6 min read Read on X
A widely anticipated, and interesting, development. What is going on? Should taxpayers be concerned? I'll explain. 🧵 #cdnecon #cdnpoli

First, here's the full picture of the Bank of Canada's finances for 2021 before all the fun started.

The Bank earns revenue from interest earnings on bonds that it holds. Expenses are (1) normal stuff, staff, etc., and (2) interest expenses, which I'll explain next. Image
Commercial banks hold much of their reserves at the central bank. They earn interest on these deposits. Recently those holdings have grown significantly as a result of quantitative easing during the pandemic. Now ~$200 billion earn interest at 3.75%. Image
That has dramatically increased interest payments to commercial banks. I estimate that sometime this summer, interest expenses exceeded total Bank of Canada revenues. The Q3 books released today was the first time this has been confirmed. bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/upl… Image
This is unique. Normally when interest rates rise so does Bank revenues/profits (graph shows all years in Bank history). But today its bonds were acquired at low rates and aren't being replaced by newer higher earning ones as it shrinks its balance sheet. But expenses are rising. Image
Fun historical aside, paying interest on deposits at the Bank of Canada is a modern thing. At first, it was not allowed to. Here's the original Act. Things changed in the late 1990s for reasons we don't need to get into now. Image
Loses at the central bank is also new for Canada. Typically, surpluses typically go to the government as a remittance.* That will no longer be the case.

* Just accounting. The Bank of Canada is consolidated within the federal govt books like all enterprise crown corps. Image
How does the Bank of Canada "cover" this loss? Well, in Q3 it had an outstanding amount owing to the government. An accounts payable, if you will. So, it just shrunk that. Image
In the future, it will need to do something else. The U.S. Federal Reserve is booking its losses in a "deferred account", which is just a way of saying it'll give the Treasury less in the future to make up for the losses today.

The govt here hasn't decided what to do.
Should taxpayers be concerned? As a crown corp, losses will negative affect the federal budget. But we should think of this as no different than the government's debt service costs. Higher interest rates increase those costs.
In effect, QE is like the government (from a consolidated perspective) issuing a bunch of short-term (think: overnight) debt to fund the redemption of long-term debt. This makes debt service costs more sensitive to changes interest rates. Image
It's just that we account for it differently. The Bank pays interest on deposits, which is recorded as an expense on its books not as interest expenses to the federal government. But that's really all it is.

For more: economist.com/finance-and-ec… Image
So yes, there are implications for the federal budget -- but it isn't a novel challenge and no different than the effect that rising interest rates has.

For more on how to think about QE, this by Stephen Williamson is excellent: stlouisfed.org/publications/r…
Also, critically, the Bank of Canada is not a commercial bank. Losses don't affect its ability to operate, and there really isn't such a thing as solvency here. Their goal is also not to generate profit, but to conduct monetary policy.

For more: bis.org/publ/bppdf/bis…
I'll end by noting that while financial losses at the central bank is a first for Canada, it's not uncommon internationally even among adv econ CBs.

And most developed countries will see CB losses. Australia already has. The United States already has. The UK already has. Etc.
How long will financial losses last, and how large will they get? I'll hopefully have a paper on that out soon!! Stay tuned!

In the meantime, hopefully this thread was helpful.

/fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trevor Tombe

Trevor Tombe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @trevortombe

May 21
Today's data: inflation rate falls to 2.7% in April. Would have fallen more, but gasoline pushed the rate up. Shelter remains largest contributor, but pace of increase is falling.

#cdnecon #cdnpoli www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quoti…
Image
The key Bank of Canada core measures of inflation have also remained within the target range -- lower than 2% -- over the past 3 months. This is what the bank is looking forward before lowering rates. Image
Here are the contributors to the drop. Most items down, but energy prices offset some of that.

This accounts for *changes* in the CPI annual rate of increase. Alternatively, had energy prices remained flat yoy, then CPI growth would have been 2.4% in April. Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 20
Today's data: inflation! 🥳 Prices were 2.9%, on average, higher in January than a year earlier. Inflation down from 3.4% in Dec. Biggest contributors to the drop were energy, food, travel. Cell phones offsetting some.



#cdnecon #cdnpoli www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quoti…
Image
Looking at the headline rate, shelter is larger contributor. Rent accounts for ~0.5 points of the 2.9, mortgage interest costs ~1.0 points.

Important: note the strong decline in the pace of grocery price growth. Now in line with historical norm. Image
The decline in inflation has also been fairly broad based, with now fewer than half of items seeing a pace of price growth above 3% -- although still a larger share than normal, which is ~0.3-0.4. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 16
Today's data: inflation!! 📈 Consumer prices were 3.4% higher in December than one year earlier. That's up from 3.1% in November.

I'll explore some of what's going on. #cdnecon #cdnpoli 🧵 www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quoti…
Image
This is higher than last month, true, but it doesn't mean the inflation situation is worsening. I noted this yesterday, saying 3.4% was the number to watch.
This is a *very* important point to keep in mind for the next *several* months. Even if things are completely normal month-by-month, the headline rate won't fall much over the next quarter. Image
Read 9 tweets
Nov 21, 2023
As expected, inflation fell in October. A lot. From 3.8% in September to 3.1% in October. And monthly, adjusted for seasonality, prices were lower in October than Sept.

I'll unpack some more patterns here 🧵 #cdnecon #cdnpoli www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quoti…
Image
A big part of the reason is from lower gasoline prices. That's anticipated because oil prices were down. There's a tight connection between energy's contribution to CPI and oil prices (obviously). This has been a consistent story over the past two years. Image
You can see the size of the contribution from energy to the change in inflation since September here 👇 . Basically everything else was a net wash. Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 11, 2023
Some Alberta Pension Plan proponents are concerned about Albertans paying more in contributions than they receive in benefits. Is this "overcontribution" legitimate? If so, does it imply the CPP is unfair? Would an APP solve it?

Allow me to explain. 🧵🤓 #cdnpoli #ableg #cdnecon
The Government of Alberta regularly cites $60 billion in excess contributions over what has been received in benefits. The report commissioned by the government includes this figure. Red is Alberta. Positive means contributions > benefits. 👇 Image
The data are accurate. You don't even need an actuary. Statistics Canada reports this annually. Total contributions from 1966-2021 amount to approximately $60 billion. Adjusting for inflation provides a clearer perspective. Image
Read 14 tweets
Nov 4, 2023
To better understand this claim, consider an equally true but misleading statement: eliminating the GST would "reduce inflation by 61%"! 😲

Does that mean the GST is inflationary? What about the carbon tax?

I'll try to clarify things 🧵 🤓 #cdnecon #cdnpoli
The GST adds 5% to the cost of purchasing a good or service subject to this tax. Not all items are subject to it, though. I (roughly) estimate that, overall, the GST adds an average of 2.3% for consumer expenditures as a whole. (From here: )www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.…
So, eliminating the GST would drop the CPI by 2.3%. Since the latest inflation reading is 3.8%, that would leave us at 1.5% (assuming nothing else changed). And 1.5% is 61% lower than 3.8%.

Simple. But not helpful or informative.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(