Anna Clemens, PhD Profile picture
Dec 1 β€’ 13 tweets β€’ 3 min read
The title of your paper is your shop front.

Here are 10 rules to write a compelling title for your scientific article.

A thread. 🧡

#AcademicChatter @TheStrugglingS4 #Postdoc
#1: The title should describe your main result

πŸ“Œ Your reader will want to know what exactly the take-away message of your paper is.
#2: The title doesn't need to convey every detail

πŸ“š Don't try to cram information into your title and don't try to communicate more than 1 key take-away in your title.
#3: The title should be fewer than 95 characters long

πŸ‘€ Long titles take longer to read and comprehend. Try to keep yours short to get more views and citations.
#4: The title should be specific

🌍 Too general titles lack keywords (important for indexing) and don't tell the reader what your study is about.
#5: The title doesn't need punctuation marks

❓ Titles with question marks, hyphens or colons receive fewer citations. Using punctuation marks will also likely mean that you are violating rule #2 or #4.
#6: The title should feature an active verb

πŸƒβ€β™€οΈ Noun-heavy titles take the reader longer to read and understand. It's better to convey the meaning of your sentence using a verb, e.g. "Running exercise strengthens the intervertebral disk" as in
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28422125/
#7: The title doesn't need filler words

🧁 Don't waste the space writing phrases such as "an observation of" or "a study of" or "on...". They are likely to violate rules #1, #2 and #4 as well.
#8: The title shouldn't contain acronyms

πŸ”€ Spell out any acronyms and abbreviations in your title that the reader of your target journal won't be likely to understand.
#9: The level of jargon in the title should match the target audience

πŸ”¬ Consider the readership of your target journal and only use jargon they will be likely to understand.
#10: The title should adhere to your target journal's guidelines

πŸ“‘ Always check the guidelines of your target journal before you start writing your paper. Some have their own rules in place you don't want to violate.
TL;DR: 10 rules to write a compelling title

#1: Describe main result
#2: Be concise
#3: < 95 characters long
#4: Be specific
#5: No punctuation marks
#6: Use an active verb
#7: No filler words
#8: No acronyms
#9: Right level of jargon
#10: Adhere to journal guidelines
If you found this thread was helpful, then watching my free training is the perfect next step for you!

πŸ’ƒIt's only about an hour long and will change the way you write your papers.

annaclemens.com/training?utm_s…

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Anna Clemens, PhD

Anna Clemens, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scientistswrite

Nov 23
As an academic writing coach, here are the 5⃣ most common mistakes I see researchers make in their scientific papers.

🧡A thread.

#AcademicChatter #PostDoc
#1: Neglecting tension

Ever got told to "tell a story" in your article? Including an element of tension is how you do it!

βœ… Clearly describe the problem that your study is solving
#2: Ignoring the broader perspective

It's easy to get bogged down in details when you're writing your paper, but it won't be obvious to your reader how your research relates to the field and society if you don't spell it out.

βœ… Explain the broader implications of your research
Read 8 tweets
Nov 19
I 🧑 podcasts. 🎧

If you do too, here are 15 recommendations (in no particular order) for podcasts about writing, research and academic life.

A thread. 🧡

#AcademicChatter #ECRchat #PostDoc
#1: Academic Writing Amplified

@cathymazak

β€’ Hosted by academic writing coach Dr Cathy Mazak
β€’ Theme Writing as a tool to advance your career
β€’ Focus on womxn

I have been a guest, check it out πŸ‘‡

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/112…
#2: Behind the Microscope

@behindthescope_

β€’ Hosted and produced by four MD/PhD students at Emory University.
β€’ Career advice for early career researchers

behindthemicroscope.com
Read 19 tweets
Nov 17
🧡
Are you and your co-authors editing the abstract of your paper again and again before submitting to get it just perfect?

πŸ‘‡ Use this template instead and save yourself hoursss!

#PostDoc #ECRchat #AcademicChater
#1 Describe the broad problem your paper solves

😱 In 1 sentence, hook your reader describing a problem in your field that your research is contributing to solving. Every reader of the journal should understand this sentence.
#2 Provide context needed to understand your study

🌳 In 1-3 sentences, give the reader any background they need to understand the motivation of your study. Clearly state the specific problem that your study solves.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 27
Here are 10 fool-proof steps to create clear & concise figures for your next research paper.

(Because how you visually communicate the results of your study is as important as the text!)

🧡A thread.

#AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter
Step 1: Define the central message of each figure

πŸ’¬ Split up figures if you are finding yourself communicating two or more key take-aways per figure (panel).
Step 2: Pick the most suitable plot type

πŸ“Š Whether you choose a bar chart, scatter plot, line, heat map or histogram depends on what conveys your message in the simplest and most accurate way.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 19
About to submit your paper? Did you know that the References are the part of a paper most often overlooked? 😳

It's not only damaging science but also making desk-rejection more likely.

Here's a 9-point references checklist for you to keep. πŸ”–

1/n

#AcademicChatter
βœ…1: Did you read every study you are referencing?

Make sure that the studies you cite are actually substantiating the statements you make in your manuscript.
βœ…2: Are you citing primary sources to support specific claims?

It's okay to cite reviews for more general statements but when you are referring to a specific finding, always cite the paper that reported it first.
Read 12 tweets
Oct 13
As an academic writing coach, here are the 5 most common mistakes I see researchers make when they write their Discussion section.

A thread. 🧡

#AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter
Mistake 1⃣: Providing paragraphs of background information

πŸ’‘ Use the Introduction section for context. In the Discussion section, any mentioned background info needs to be discussed together with your own findings.
Mistake 2⃣: Expecting the reader to have read all previous section

πŸ’‘ Tell the whole story by restating the problem you are solving with your study so that readers understand the motivation for your research.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(