John E Deaton Profile picture
Dec 7 8 tweets 3 min read
Remember immediately after the @LBRYcom decision what I said. I said it was a total victory for the SEC and that SEC attorneys couldn’t have written a better decision for them. I also said the SEC and many other people would make a BIG deal about it.
I also said that if Judge Torres followed the LBRY Judge’s reasoning, Ripple would outright lose. I said that reasoning would cause a lot of “Ripple will lose” comments. Its expected b/c holding a lot of #LBC was a big deal to the judge and Ripple holds 1/2 the #XRP.
Personally, I believe the SEC snatched defeat from the jaws of victory in this case because it chose to go with an all or nothing theory (unless the judge decides to split the baby).
Remember, the Judge in LBRY is in the 1st Circuit and has to follow the SG case. Judge Torres is in the 2nd Circuit and must follow Revak and other cases. Also, remember LBRY didn’t challenge 2 out of 3 Howey factors. The common enterprise factor is a REAL problem for the SEC.
When someone says the SEC is going to win, respectfully ask what that “win” looks like. Are they saying the Judge is going to Rule: GRANTED to the SEC’s summary judgment, as written?
For ex, a ruling in favor of the SEC that Ripple offered an unregistered security in 2014 to the approximate 100 people it sent a brochure to but present day sales are not a security is a complete Ripple victory.
If Judge Torres agrees with this:

“The Howey test must be applied to each transaction and examined as of the time that the transaction took place.” S.E.C. v. Aqua–Sonic Prods. Corp., 524 F. Supp. 866, 876 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).

Then the SEC has a real problem.
The SEC’s specific evidence are things like a brochure to 100 people in 2014, a 2013 Tweet, an email to an investor in 2015, a list of exchanges trading XRP in 2017 on Ripple’s website.

The SEC offering these examples from almost a decade ago to present day might be a problem.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John E Deaton

John E Deaton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnEDeaton1

Dec 7
WERE RIPPLE EXECUTIVES RECKLESS - 🧵

In order for @chrislarsensf & @bgarlinghouse to lose the individual claims made against them, the judge has to conclude, as a matter of law, the two executives were reckless in not knowing #XRP was a security. Not negligent - but reckless!
Said another way, the judge must find that no reasonable jury could ever conclude that the 2 executives were NOT reckless.

With that in mind, let’s consider some FACTS:

1) SEC enforcement lawyers were allowed to own and trade #XRP until March of 2019;
2) in 2014 the @USGAO classified #XRP “a virtual currency utilized in a decentralized payment system called @Ripple”;

3) in 2015, FinCEN and the DOJ settled w/Ripple declaring #XRP a virtual currency - forcing Ripple to register #XRP sales w/ FinCEN, NOT w/the @SECGov;
Read 19 tweets
Dec 6
Let’s place the below comment in proper context w/ something I like to call:

FACTS.

In August 2018 - 2 months after the Hinman speech and 2 months after SEC enforcement lawyers wrote a memo 📝 analyzing XRP under Howey, @bgarlinghouse and @JoelKatz met w/ Clayton & Hinman.
We know exactly what happened during this meeting because the SEC turned over the SEC’s notes 📝 from the meeting even though it didn’t have to because it was privileged work product. So the facts I recite are not self-serving statements by Ripple or it’s executives.
Two months earlier, Hinman declared #BTC & #ETH non-securities. At the time, #XRP was the #3 Crypto by market cap (it was #2 several times in 2018).

Ripple’s CEO frustratingly spoke out and said:

@Ripple is living in purgatory because #XRP doesn’t have regulatory clarity.”
Read 22 tweets
Dec 5
I understand the point he’s trying to make 👇. He’s saying an appellate decision is a much bigger deal than a district judge’s decision. That’s why I said the @LBRYcom decision wasn’t as big of a deal as some people claimed. He’s looking at it from a legal precedent standpoint.
But Judge Torres’ decision will have a HUGE impact practically and politically speaking. For ex, if the Judge agrees 💯 w/the SEC, @GaryGensler’s Regulation by Enforcement campaign will gain credibility and momentum. To Crypto outsiders, he won’t look like he’s out of line.
If @Ripple outright wins AND the judge criticizes the SEC for pursuing the implausible theory that the token itself, from the beginning of time until the end of the world, even sold in far-away lands, is ALWAYS a security, no matter who sells it, could halt Genlser’s campaign.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 15
Imagine if we could travel back in time to 2018:

The SEC could give a speech - not by Hinman b/c of conflicts - but by someone else (e.g. Valerie S., the Crypto Czar) - stating that the SEC, after much discussion (ie 63 emails and 58 drafts), made a significant determination.
The SEC had determined that #BTC & #ETH were sufficiently decentralized b/c specific bench marks had been established and it specified what those bench marks were.

Imagine if the SEC in 2018 admitted that there existed regulatory uncertainty for the other projects and tokens.
Imagine if Chairman Jay Clayton, with @HesterPeirce and Elad Roisman, after public hearings and public comment, enacted the Safe Harbor Proposal suggested by Hester. Those 3 Commissioners equalled a majority vote.
Read 12 tweets
Nov 13
Every legitimate person supporting blockchain technology, decentralization, and digital assets desperately desires regulation. Had the U.S. implemented regulatory clarity w/specific guidelines in 2018 like it should have - innovation, job creation, tax revenue would have 🚀
Consumer protections could’ve been implemented. Proof of 1:1 reserves for any exchange or platform, the segregation of consumer funds and crypto from being commingled, disallowing the loaning out of consumer funds, protections disallowing bankruptcy from being used as a strategy.
But, as usual, our political leaders only react - they never act. And when you react to a crisis, you usually go too far or do something stupid b/c these politicians want to pretend they’re doing something after the fact. For ex, what was the 1st reaction by some of our leaders?
Read 6 tweets
Nov 12
These are the people that will gaslight the public and legislators. SBF committed fraud and theft. We have regulations and laws that cover what he did. FTX was an OFFSHORE exchange.
There is nothing @ewarren or @GaryGensler said or asked for that would have prevented FTX’s collapse b/c it collapsed due to FRAUD and THEFT.

The DCCPA being offered by @SenStabenow & @JohnBoozman wouldn’t have prevented the collapse and the bill WAS WRITTEN & promoted BY SBF.
As for defending Gensler:

in 2018, at MIT, he stated the market needed clarity - he even said @Ripple needed clarity.👇
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(