As an academic writing coach, here are the 7 mistakes I see supervisors and PIs make in the process of co-writing a paper with their PhD students or mentees.

A thread. 🧵

#AcademicChatter #newPI #PhDchat
#1 Not teaching your students the steps that are part of the process to write a paper

🙆 The main reason novice writers procrastinate on that task to write a paper is that they don’t know how to get started and break this huge and overwhelming project into manageable chunks.
#2: Only editing the grammar, punctuation and syntax of your students’ work

📋 First drafts usually benefit the most from structural comments to make sure the paper tells a single and compelling story. Do that before you spend hours on moving commas.
#3: Telling your students that they should tell a story in their paper without defining what that is

🎬 I see this alllll the time. “Story” means everything and nothing if you don’t specify which exact elements the paper needs to include to tell said story.
#4: Not setting internal deadlines throughout the writing process

📆 You may think that enforcing deadlines comes across as pushy but a clear timeline helps everyone! Do include your mentee in the process of creating the timeline.
#5: Not explaining what you didn’t like about their writing

💬 Whenever you revise your mentees’ writing, provide reasons for your edits. If writing the comments takes too much time, record a video walking your student through your edits.
#6: Having your student write a complete draft before you discuss what the story and flow of your paper will be

📝 It’s is demoralising for anyone to get a draft completely ripped apart. It’s also a waste of time. Give feedback throughout the writing process instead!
#7: Thinking reading the literature will teach your students writing

👩‍🏫 Most students don’t know what good and bad writing looks like and “the literature” contains both. Provide your mentees with quality writing training instead -- whether facilitated by you or someone else.
Bonus #8: Not checking in with your student about what they may need

👩‍🎓 Everyone has a different working style so while it’s your job to guide your mentee through the process of writing a paper, do check in with them about what kind of help would be most beneficial to them.
TL;DR: 8 mistakes PIs make in the co-writing process (1/2)

#1 Not teaching the steps of the process to write a paper

#2 Only editing the language, not the structure

#3 Not defining what a story is

#4 Not setting internal deadlines
TL;DR: 8 mistakes PIs make in the co-writing process (2/2)

#5 Not providing reasons for your edits

#6 Having your student write a complete draft first thing

#7 Thinking reading the literature teaches writing

#8 Not checking in with your student about what they may need
Whether you are a PhD student or (aspiring) PI:

If you found this thread helpful and would like to learn a streamlined system to co-write papers from start to finish, this free training will be ideal! 👇✨

annaclemens.com/training?utm_s…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anna Clemens, PhD

Anna Clemens, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scientistswrite

Dec 1
The title of your paper is your shop front.

Here are 10 rules to write a compelling title for your scientific article.

A thread. 🧵

#AcademicChatter @TheStrugglingS4 #Postdoc
#1: The title should describe your main result

📌 Your reader will want to know what exactly the take-away message of your paper is.
#2: The title doesn't need to convey every detail

📚 Don't try to cram information into your title and don't try to communicate more than 1 key take-away in your title.
Read 13 tweets
Nov 23
As an academic writing coach, here are the 5⃣ most common mistakes I see researchers make in their scientific papers.

🧵A thread.

#AcademicChatter #PostDoc
#1: Neglecting tension

Ever got told to "tell a story" in your article? Including an element of tension is how you do it!

✅ Clearly describe the problem that your study is solving
#2: Ignoring the broader perspective

It's easy to get bogged down in details when you're writing your paper, but it won't be obvious to your reader how your research relates to the field and society if you don't spell it out.

✅ Explain the broader implications of your research
Read 8 tweets
Nov 19
I 🧡 podcasts. 🎧

If you do too, here are 15 recommendations (in no particular order) for podcasts about writing, research and academic life.

A thread. 🧵

#AcademicChatter #ECRchat #PostDoc
#1: Academic Writing Amplified

@cathymazak

• Hosted by academic writing coach Dr Cathy Mazak
• Theme Writing as a tool to advance your career
• Focus on womxn

I have been a guest, check it out 👇

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/112…
#2: Behind the Microscope

@behindthescope_

• Hosted and produced by four MD/PhD students at Emory University.
• Career advice for early career researchers

behindthemicroscope.com
Read 19 tweets
Nov 17
🧵
Are you and your co-authors editing the abstract of your paper again and again before submitting to get it just perfect?

👇 Use this template instead and save yourself hoursss!

#PostDoc #ECRchat #AcademicChater
#1 Describe the broad problem your paper solves

😱 In 1 sentence, hook your reader describing a problem in your field that your research is contributing to solving. Every reader of the journal should understand this sentence.
#2 Provide context needed to understand your study

🌳 In 1-3 sentences, give the reader any background they need to understand the motivation of your study. Clearly state the specific problem that your study solves.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 27
Here are 10 fool-proof steps to create clear & concise figures for your next research paper.

(Because how you visually communicate the results of your study is as important as the text!)

🧵A thread.

#AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter
Step 1: Define the central message of each figure

💬 Split up figures if you are finding yourself communicating two or more key take-aways per figure (panel).
Step 2: Pick the most suitable plot type

📊 Whether you choose a bar chart, scatter plot, line, heat map or histogram depends on what conveys your message in the simplest and most accurate way.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 19
About to submit your paper? Did you know that the References are the part of a paper most often overlooked? 😳

It's not only damaging science but also making desk-rejection more likely.

Here's a 9-point references checklist for you to keep. 🔖

1/n

#AcademicChatter
✅1: Did you read every study you are referencing?

Make sure that the studies you cite are actually substantiating the statements you make in your manuscript.
✅2: Are you citing primary sources to support specific claims?

It's okay to cite reviews for more general statements but when you are referring to a specific finding, always cite the paper that reported it first.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(