CJI: Point us to the meat of the matter. You are saying scribe cannot be only for those with benchmark disability. What is the second aspect ?
Adv: The scribe should not have completed 11th grade....I could be a graduate also writing for CLAT.. i can get someone 1 step below
CJI: But CLAT is for 12th standard students. That is why scribe should not be a standard 12 pass out.
Adv: We are trying to widen the base of available scribes. We are saying one step below can be chosen
CJI: if the candidate has done third year BA you are saying you will take second year BA which is dicey. Scribe should not have cleared 12th STD rule is fine, we don't want to say a third year BA can take first year BA scribe
Adv: but must not be affiliated with any test preparatory organisation
CJI to NLU counsel: You cannot say scribe only for someone with benchmark disability
Adv: I bow down
CJI: When is CLAT taking place ?
Adv: 18th
CJI: allow all with disability and not only benchmark
Adv: but there should be a writing disability.. we accomodate anyone who comes with fracture in hands.
CJI: Yes don't confine to only benchmark disability
Adv for NLU: Ministry now wants a proper certification for such Disability.. even UGC
CJI: it has to be made simple
Adv: we don't have any specified certification
Justice Narasimha: any expert authorised can give a certificate
CJI to NLU counsel: we do not want our order to be subject to misuse. Please formulate something for us which says scribes not only for benchmark disability and make certificate process more streamlined.. we will also incorporate that in our order.
CJI to NLU counsel: We will keep it tomorrow (and you) come with a statement
Adv: The petitioner is a Public interest petitioner and not even a candidate
CJI: Oh..
Adv for petitioner: I am a disability rights activist
CJI: The moment you say that it means you are also concerned..it is ok. We get it
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
CJI: If we do not act in matters of personal liberty and grant relief then what are we doing here? What is SC doing and is it not a breach under Article 136. #SupremeCourt exists to hear to the cry of such petitioners. We burn the midnight oil for such cases and see there is more
The above comment comes in the backdrop of a case where a person seeks bail. This person Iqram has served 7 years already and has another 10 years to go in a case where he had stolen electricity. There was plea bargaining too in the case. #SupremeCourt
CJI DY Chandrachud asks Senior Lawyer Nagamuthu to be present in the court for this case
CJI: This is why I asked you to stay back. Just imagine. As a former Madras HC judge you know that no case is too big or no case is too small for the Supreme Court. #SupremeCourt
Supreme Court observes that a when a particular property is targeted in a PIL, the High Court is often aware why the party has approached the court
CJI: Idea is to target one project and HC often knows why is it happening. You dont target the principle #SupremeCourt
PILs could become an instrument of BLACKMAIL when it is an issue of an infrastructure project. This actually makes a plank to target such projects. High Court has actually smelled the rat here. This is happening across in Delhi, Mumbai, etc. Target fungible FSI and not this: CJI
What happens in such redevelopment projects is that only another competitor is behind such petitions and they join with other builders. I have sat across many such cases before the Bombay court: CJI DY Chandrachud #supremecourt
[RTE Act] Delhi HC observes that there is a dismal state of affairs when it comes to rights of EWS children getting admission into private schools.
"It is high time that the judiciary exercises its powers under Article 226 of Constitution." #DelhiHighCourt#EWS#RTEAct
Justice Chandra Dhari Singh quotes Mahatma Gandhi to hold that basic education should be free and compulsory in the country and it is a basic need for India.
Court says it is high time that the judiciary reaches the people because the poor people are not able to avail their fundamental rights.
It directs Delhi's Department of Education to ensure that RTE Act is implemented in letter and spirit and EWS get representation.
Inhabitants of Valmiki Basti move #SupremeCourt against the proposed demolition of their basti in Nainital
Adv: We have a history of 100 years and notice was on December 7. But the demolition is illegal
CJI DY Chandrachud: Keep the papers ready, we will take it up
CJI: You can go back to the HC. Uttarakhand HC is working during vacations.
Adv: we were not arrayed as parties. March 2020 we had filed our review. we are the sanitation workers. we are the unwanted, nobody wants us as tenants. cry of poor dalits.
CJI: Sorry go to HC
Adv: I will withdraw then..
CJI: Nov 22 order is passed and you come at last moment and you put pressure on judges to stay. stay from SC means in public interest you see
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by an MBBS candidate with a 55% speech disability, who was denied admission on account of her disability being more than 40%.
Counsel submits that an elaborate committee of AIIMS doctors had come to the conclusion that if someone has over 40 percent disability then they might not be able to perform duties of a doctor
Adv: can refer this student to AIIMS who can be judged if fit for the MBBS course
Adv for petitioner: If i have a disability to not complete the course etc. ..
CJI: This is only a speech defect. you must look at the broader perspective of inclusion, have a broader framework, have someone from social justice ministry and also disability rights area