CJI DY Chandrachud: We direct as an interim measure that admission of the candidate shall not be disturbed subject to final disposal of the case and thereafter the petitioner shall not claim any equity
Counsel for NMC objects
NMC: students who had studied Class 11&12 with Physics, Chemistry, Bio and English were eligible for NEET. If later you decide that he is not eligible then this seat will go waste. #supremecourt
CJI: Has he appeared in class 11 exams:
Adv: Yes. He appeared with Class 11, class 12 exams as well
CJI:Oh together
CJI: NIOS is directed to clarify through an affidavit that in terms of para 43 of the Delhi HC order, whether the petitioner has appeared for both class 11 and 12 exams.
Sr Adv Nidhesh Gupta: CBSE says we recognise NIOS and can take admission by appearing in NIOS exam.
CJI: We have passed an interim order now.
The candidate can pursue the admission process as of now
CJI: If we do not act in matters of personal liberty and grant relief then what are we doing here? What is SC doing and is it not a breach under Article 136. #SupremeCourt exists to hear to the cry of such petitioners. We burn the midnight oil for such cases and see there is more
The above comment comes in the backdrop of a case where a person seeks bail. This person Iqram has served 7 years already and has another 10 years to go in a case where he had stolen electricity. There was plea bargaining too in the case. #SupremeCourt
CJI DY Chandrachud asks Senior Lawyer Nagamuthu to be present in the court for this case
CJI: This is why I asked you to stay back. Just imagine. As a former Madras HC judge you know that no case is too big or no case is too small for the Supreme Court. #SupremeCourt
Supreme Court observes that a when a particular property is targeted in a PIL, the High Court is often aware why the party has approached the court
CJI: Idea is to target one project and HC often knows why is it happening. You dont target the principle #SupremeCourt
PILs could become an instrument of BLACKMAIL when it is an issue of an infrastructure project. This actually makes a plank to target such projects. High Court has actually smelled the rat here. This is happening across in Delhi, Mumbai, etc. Target fungible FSI and not this: CJI
What happens in such redevelopment projects is that only another competitor is behind such petitions and they join with other builders. I have sat across many such cases before the Bombay court: CJI DY Chandrachud #supremecourt
[RTE Act] Delhi HC observes that there is a dismal state of affairs when it comes to rights of EWS children getting admission into private schools.
"It is high time that the judiciary exercises its powers under Article 226 of Constitution." #DelhiHighCourt#EWS#RTEAct
Justice Chandra Dhari Singh quotes Mahatma Gandhi to hold that basic education should be free and compulsory in the country and it is a basic need for India.
Court says it is high time that the judiciary reaches the people because the poor people are not able to avail their fundamental rights.
It directs Delhi's Department of Education to ensure that RTE Act is implemented in letter and spirit and EWS get representation.
Inhabitants of Valmiki Basti move #SupremeCourt against the proposed demolition of their basti in Nainital
Adv: We have a history of 100 years and notice was on December 7. But the demolition is illegal
CJI DY Chandrachud: Keep the papers ready, we will take it up
CJI: You can go back to the HC. Uttarakhand HC is working during vacations.
Adv: we were not arrayed as parties. March 2020 we had filed our review. we are the sanitation workers. we are the unwanted, nobody wants us as tenants. cry of poor dalits.
CJI: Sorry go to HC
Adv: I will withdraw then..
CJI: Nov 22 order is passed and you come at last moment and you put pressure on judges to stay. stay from SC means in public interest you see
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by an MBBS candidate with a 55% speech disability, who was denied admission on account of her disability being more than 40%.
Counsel submits that an elaborate committee of AIIMS doctors had come to the conclusion that if someone has over 40 percent disability then they might not be able to perform duties of a doctor
Adv: can refer this student to AIIMS who can be judged if fit for the MBBS course
Adv for petitioner: If i have a disability to not complete the course etc. ..
CJI: This is only a speech defect. you must look at the broader perspective of inclusion, have a broader framework, have someone from social justice ministry and also disability rights area