>> This, despite the warning by Babasaheb Ambedkar and the reluctance of Sardar Patel to be associated with what came to be known as Article 370 of the Indian constitution on 17 October 1949.
2/n
We tend to forget some important markers from our past; otherwise, we should have set in stone these words spoken wisely by B.R. Ambedkar when he refused to draft Article 370.
3/n
4/n B.R Ambedkar told Sheikh Abdullah in 1948:
"" You wish India should protect your borders, she should build roads in your area, she should supply you food grains, and Kashmir should get equal status as India. But the Government of India should have only limited powers and
Indian people should have no rights in Kashmir. To give consent to this proposal would be a treacherous thing against the interests of India, and I, as the law minister of India, will never do it.""
5/n
>>Ambedkar was prophetically correct in saying that this proposal would be treacherous. Yet, Nehru had insisted that Article 370 be adopted by the parliament.
>>Besides the gap this created between Kashmir and the rest of the country, it also retarded the development of the
7/n
region because of the restrictions it put on settlement and the practical difficulties in setting up industries there.
>>Ever since, it has proved to be a wasteful millstone for the country and ruinous for the state itself.
8/n
>>Acc to the statements in the parliament, and by common consensus, it was meant to be a temporary provision. But Article 370 lingered on out of fear of the reaction from the Valley’s politicians should it be repealed. Added to this was the worry about Pakistan’s mischief.
9/n
>> However, the background to its introduction was once again the idealism of Nehru and his strong belief that temporary aberrations like Article 370 would be taken in the spirit that they were first introduced in.
10/n
Unknowingly I missed No 6 in the thread
So don't search for Number 6 in the thread
Take no 5 to 7 as a continuation of the thread
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How Indian Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru Rejected US (1950) and USSR (1955) offer for Permanent seat at UN Security Council
>>With the passage of time, and a more relaxed bureaucratic regime in many parts of the world, the long-buried archives are opening up.
1/n
It is now possible draw a reasonably accurate picture of what may have actually transpired.
>>There is now both circumstantial and archival evidence that the UNSC seat was indeed offered to India by the US in 1950 and by the USSR in 1955.
2/n
>>This offer came at a time when Washington was looking to shape the UN’s decision-making in its favour.
>>The Soviet Union had walked out of the UN in January 1950 in protest against the US (and others)
blocking the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking up
Indian Air Force practicing OCA missions against Chinese PLAAF over North East India.
>> Offensive counter-air (OCA) is a military term for the suppression of an enemy's military air power, primarily through ground attacks targeting enemy air bases: disabling or destroying parked aircraft, runways, fuel facilities, hangars, air traffic control facilities and other
aviation infrastructure. Ground munitions like bombs are typically less expensive than more sophisticated air-to-air munitions, and a single ground munition can destroy or disable multiple aircraft in a very short time whereas aircraft already flying must typically be shot down
Context
>>There is growing evidence to suggest that the most conspicuous trend in the manufacturing sector in #India has been a shift of manufacturing activity and employment from bigger cities to smaller towns and rural areas.
>>This ‘urban-rural manufacturing shift’ has often been interpreted as a mixed bag, as it has its share of advantages that could transform the rural economy, as well as a set of constraints, which could hamper higher growth.
Recent data by Annual Survey of Industries for 2019-20
>>In terms of capital: The rural segment is a significant contributor to the manufacturing sector’s output. While 42% of factories are in rural areas, 62% of fixed capital is in the rural side.
India’s experience under colonial rule: A study by Dylan Sullivan and Jason Hickel
Context
>>A recent study of India’s experience under colonial rule by Dylan Sullivan and Jason Hickel concludes that data from the Census of India reveal that between 1880 and 1920 approximately 100 million Indians died due to British policy in India.
>>Their method is to calculate the excess mortality, being the difference between the actual deaths and the deaths that may be expected.
India's relations with the outside world will be the other test before we can claim to be on solid ground. This essentially means dealing with other countries, especially our neighbours and the big powers, in a manner that ensures peace and security.
According to the theories that currently carry conviction, there are three basic ways of achieving this result—
>>coercion,
>>payment
or
>>attraction.
This mix is regarded as the mantra of a good national
strategy.
But to be historically correct, it must be pointed out that this mantra is neither new nor a Western discovery. As a matter of fact,the basic premise of it has been around for centuries.
Organization of Islamic Cooperation (#OIC) Comments on Kashmir
>>India strongly condemned the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation chief’s visit to Line of Control (LoC) from the Pakistani side.
What is OIC?
>>The OIC — formerly Organisation of the Islamic Conference — is the world’s second-largest inter-governmental organization after the UN, with a membership of 57 states.
>>The OIC’s stated objective is “to safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony among various people of the world”.
>>OIC has reserved membership for Muslim-majority countries. Russia, Thailand,