Remember the #WiSpa? When all the people tried to blame the women? And the little girl? Well this criminal was just apprehended.

All the gaslighters ought to be very ashamed. With one in particular.
Remember these comments? ImageImageImageImage
Remember they held demonstrations to scold any women objecting to being flashed? Remember when they came screaming in the streets to protect that predator? #WiSpa.

We don’t forget. We have receipts. ImageImageImage
Remember when they tried to tell us it was all staged? That it never happened? #WiSpa

We remember. Image
They gaslit and gaslit and gaslit. #WiSpa ImageImageImageImage
This is the playbook. You can practically call it in real time.

#WiSpa Image
We don’t forget @latimes. We don’t forget. You gaslit the women and supported the flasher. And a little girl was there!!!

Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖

Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @babybeginner

Jul 24
Breaking! Thread.

This is HUGE!! During the tribunal, the witness has lapsed into calling Dr Upton “he”. Jane Russell can’t have that and breaks in to remind the witness that we are all playing a game!

This sounds to me like suborning perjury but what do I know. 1/. Image
She claims the witness is getting confused bc Naomi keeps (properly) referring to Dr. Upton as “he”. Then she tries to claim that standards dictate this witness lie. She claims that Naomi is creating a hostile environment!! Talk about projection! 2/ Image
Image
Jane asks Naomi to “reflect on her language used in court.”

The judge asks Naomi if she wants to say anything or have time to reflect. Naomi comes back with THE perfect answer:

“No.”

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. 3/ Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 19
Thread.

After 21 million views, here is a summary of the response to the new “feature” Ani.

The response to Ani is “overwhelmingly negative”. The negative comments come from (surprise) predominantly male users. 1/ Image
The responses to this new character are “overwhelmingly negative”. The backlash stems from concerns about the s*xualized nature of Ani and the undermining of human connections.

2/ Image
People responded that these “companions” could foster isolation. They argue that this feature seemingly contradicts Musk’s stance on declining birth rates. They find it inappropriate and potentially harmful’. 3/ Image
Read 6 tweets
Jul 13
Thread

Lesbian Action Group has written a brief on behalf of Sall Grover in the case of Giggle v Tickle.

“it is now commonplace for lesbians to be pressured into having six with transwomen, and to face risk of social isolation if they do not agree with that very concept.”

1/ Image
Giggle is an app that @salltweets created for women only. Mr. Tickle demanded access to it & Sall said no. 2/
That’s it. She just said no. The question in this case is essentially whether women are allowed to say no.

It’s an important case and it is crazy expensive to fight. All that guy has to do is make a demand and Sall’s world is turned upside down. 3/
Read 6 tweets
Jul 9
I Am NEVER Leaving This App.

Dude thinks the word Bear is defamation!!!

😂😂😂😂😂

Let’s try to explain this one.

Thread. Image
It’s starts here. With this conversation. 2/ Image
It continues here. With this 😮 comment. 3/ Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 7
For three hours today I watched a man go on and on about exactly what criteria it should take to allow men into the ladies room. He’s had surgery so he’s decided that the compromise is to let him into our spaces.

Where do they get the nerve to think they can decide? 1/
Then I watched some women say they were fine with it. One of them I know is a man, but others could be women. Where do they get the nerve to think they can decide to open our spaces to anyone?

2/
And all of this for what? Because they can’t bear to say no to these particular men?

It’s ok. They’ll get over it.

Better to tell them no than to cross a woman’s boundaries.

3/
Read 5 tweets
Jul 3
Thread.

So, I posted yesterday about Keith Olberman’d weird obsession with Riley Gaines. Then I did a search for some of his comments about her. This is just the most recent stuff. There were so many comments I’d be taking screenshots all day.

1/ Image
Image
Image
Image
Here are some more.

2/ Image
Image
Image
Image
And yet another. All his comments are vicious. He is enraged with her for what? For protecting women’s sports? For speaking about schools putting men in the girl’s locker rooms? For saying no?

What she’s doing is amazing. She’s standing up for young girls. 3/ Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(