Though yet again the point is missed that services do not only allow restraint & seclusion to be used as a last resort in response to emergencies ("imminent violence") - in some, it's routine
I was never, ever, in any way even remotely violent or even resistant
Once you notice it, it's there in every piece of research & writing on seclusion & restraint - the assumption that these are only ever used as a last resort in response to emergencies
But it's not true
Any & all work that is based on this assumption has failed from the outset
If an analysis/research does not acknowledge that, on some wards, the leadership & culture does not question, facilitates or even expects restraint & seclusion to be used in situations which are NOT emergencies, then it is flawed from the outset
What is the point of writing about the impacts of restraint & seclusion on staff & patients if there's no acknowledgement that they can be used as routine practice?
A culture where these grossly coercive practices are used in this way negatively impacts on both staff & patients
What's the point of hand-wringing by professionals "shocked" at abuses on inpatient psychiatric wards which doesn't even acknowledge that abuse can include use of restraint & seclusion?
In my case, the multiple restraints I was subjected to are inexplicable on any sound basis
There is no justification whatsoever
I was wordlessly ambushed, restrained, forcibly injected - once, when I'd stepped out of a meeting with my IMHA to get a letter she'd requested!
There was not a single occasion of restraint or seclusion to which I was subjected at the hands of qualified #mentalhealth staff which was justified or followed the Mental Health Act code of practice or any of the professional duties of the staff involved
Yet they all took part
All these members of staff took part
The ward manager took part (she led the first ambush restraint - I was sitting in bed, reading)
The manager of the rapid response team took part (he led the team that carried me face down & shoeless into the seclusion room on the men's ward)
All the staff took part
They did not speak to me, but coordinated with each other - one on each limb, one holding my head, one to oversee - as if I were an animal
I talked to them throughout, but they ignored me
For them, this was business as usual - a routine job to be done
Imagine going in to work to do that to other human beings
I've had staff contact me on twitter about abusive cultures that take hold, where this is normalised, where those who try to speak out are the ones who are bullied out of their jobs
Imagine the effect on poorly patients
The "closed cultures in inpatient mental health services" can't begin to be addressed unless it's acknowledged that those closed cultures can and do - now, today - use restraint & seclusion in abusive ways
The way I was treated by inpatient psychiatric staff while sectioned caused me to develop post-traumatic stress disorder
The years since then, without treatment for #ptsd, have compounded the harm caused to me
Think carefully before using restraint or seclusion
Very carefully
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One consequence of the NHS withdrawing from providing care for folks with severe & enduring #mentalillness is that poorly & vulnerable folks are thrown onto the unregulated private market & things like wellness industry woo
This puts them at risk of neglect, & also active harm
When mainstream medicine refuses to help folks who've been diagnosed with serious #mentalillness, they're forced to look elsewhere
Folks with ongoing conditions don't just stop being unwell because the NHS decommissions services for them & excludes them from care
With NHS #mentalhealth services ignoring national guidance & local policies, with the NHS no longer commissioning care for folks with serious #mentalillness, professionals & patients are left guessing what to do
Forced to improvise, to look to social media, rely on folk remedies