📢ICYMI: We’re calling on our community to share how YOU will resolve to fight for #democracy in 2023. Whether it's attending a school board meeting or writing a postcard to voters, no act is too small to help us meet this critical moment. Fill out yours: bit.ly/3FQvaUj
To help shape our 2023 #resolutions we’re taking a look back on some lessons learned from our fights for #democracy in 2022. First up: our challenge to the Mississippi state legislature’s funneling of private money to public schools. apnews.com/article/covid-… /2
We filed suit to stop this illegal behavior on behalf of parents at @PPS_National with @ACLU_MS@justice4ms and WON. The ruling is a victory for children and families in the state and every person who believes in the value of public education.
Next year, we resolve to continue our work to hold officials in Mississippi – and in states across the country – accountable as the decision has been appealed by the state Attorney General.
As inspiration for our next #2023resolution, we’re reflecting on the state of Texas’ failure to release its findings & recommendations to address the state’s maternal health crisis in the timing required by law. sacurrent.com/news/group-fil… /1
After a delay of THREE months and in direct response to pressure – including threats of legal action – from our partners and advocates, lawmakers, physicians & health care professionals like @MySMFM the TX DSHS and the TX MMMRC released their report. chron.com/news/houston-t… /2
The failure of DSHS to release this report in the time required by law is another example of the Abbott admin’s apparent belief that it is above the law. It shouldn’t take being threatened with a lawsuit to do what Texas is legally required to do for the health of mothers. /3
Public officials #accountability to the communities they represent is a bedrock of our #democracy. We resolve to keep up that pressure and continue to push for transparency and against the undermining of data and evidence in states across the country in the new year. 4/4
Our next #resolution for 2023 is to never stop playing the long game. Why? Because not every win happens overnight. Take our Trump-era challenge to the ‘Sunset Rule’ which would have set a time bomb on thousands of health & food safety regulations. bit.ly/3YRDBr8 /1
Collaboration is critical in the fight for #democracy – without our clients & partners we could not do our work challenging anti-democratic movements across the country. Our next #resolution for #2023 is to continue to build on our partnerships with orgs like @weareoversight. /1
Together we were able to successfully put an end to the deletion of public records by election investigators in Wisconsin, protecting the public’s ability to know what its government is doing on their behalf.
Coalition building is an integral part of our fight for #democracy. Ensuring our courts hear a wide range of voices on key issues is fundamental to our work and inspires our next #resolution to continue to amplify groups that represent the fabric of America. /1
When employers challenged protections for workers facing layoffs, we partnered with teachers, unions & researchers from @AFTunion@SEIU@CWAUnion@NelpNews@AFSCME in filing a brief affirming the importance of these protections and WON. 2/2
The government intends to rely on an appointed workgroup to develop the training. One participant touts her membership in an organization opposed to books “they say promote Islam, socialism, sex, LGBTQ identity, evolutionary science, climate change, or gun control.” 2/
Another member is urging the state to threaten those who violate the censorship laws with felony convictions. lgbtqnation.com/2022/10/anti-l… 3/
FILED: We sued in Wisconsin on behalf of @weareoversight to stop the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), the group responsible for a partisan inquiry into WI's 2020 election results, from deleting public docs days after an official from OSC testified he deleted investigation records
WI’s Office of Special Counsel was created by the Wisconsin Assembly in 2021 to examine claims made by Trump about the integrity of the 2020 election. Despite spending nearly a million taxpayer dollars, the inquiry has uncovered no credible evidence of irregularities. 2/
The deletion of these documents by the OSC not only violates Wisconsin law, it flies in the face of the public’s right to oversee the Assembly’s investigation of the 2020 election. 3/
ICYMI: Last week, w/ @rtushnet & a coalition of First Amendment & securities disclosure law experts, we submitted a comment supporting @SECGov climate disclosure rule.
Despite vocal opposition, strong evidence underscores investors' need for this information. Let's dive in🧵
Companies may face climate-related risks like catastrophic weather events, supply chain disruptions, changing demand, and regulatory and transition costs as the world uses fewer fossil fuels. And the consequences of not having access to this information are high. /2
Many publicly-traded companies have a practice of making similar disclosures or discussing anticipated climate-related risks in annual reports. Uniform disclosure rules will allow investors to understand how climate risks affect individual firms & to make accurate comparisons. /3
THREAD: @ProPublica's reporting about social media activity by @CBP employees was shocking. CPB has said that it’s investigating the Facebook group, as is Congress; we have *18* legal questions for them that are a good place to start. 1/
@propublica@CBP According to ProPublica, thousands of current and former CBP employees may have participated in a FB group demeaning migrants, celebrating their pain, misery, and death, and threatening members of Congress. 2/ propublica.org/article/secret…
@propublica@CBP Under 5 CFR § 735.203, would CBP employees’ posts be considered conduct “immoral,” “notoriously disgraceful,” or “prejudicial to the Government”? 3/
NEW: We and @VoteVets just sued the VA over a breathtakingly illegal scheme: empowering Mar-a-Lago members to steer Veterans Affairs policy from Trump’s golf club.
@votevets We know Trump isn't fond of following the law. But secretly turning a ~$200 billion agency over to 3 unqualified Mar-a-Lago buddies who haven’t served in our military is a masterpiece of lawlessness that violates the Federal Advisory Committee Act. propublica.org/article/ike-pe…
@votevets Congress passed FACA in the early 1970s to formalize how outside advisers influence the president and federal agencies. It was meant to curb special interests' ability to covertly steer policymaking.
While we’re on the subject. Here’s a list of actions @realDonaldTrump has taken since January to roll back protections for survivors of sexual assault. (Apologies for length) 1/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @realDonaldTrump view original on Twitter