🧵
After 🇭🇷 won the🥉place in #WorldCup2022, 🇭🇷 players celebrated by singing patriotic songs by Marko Perković Thompson, including his iconic '90s song "Bojna Čavoglave" w/ its opening verse "Za dom spremni". Countless anti-🇭🇷 activists labeled 🇭🇷 players & the song as #fascist
THE SUPREME COURT OF CROATIA on the salute "Za dom spremni" of the patriotic song "Bojna Čavoglave" by Marko Perković Thompson: "In the appeal the prosecutor claims that the defendant [Thompson] knowingly and intentionally encouraged the audience to participate in the performance
of that salute in the manner in which that salute was performed as official salute of the totalitarian regime of the Independent State of Croatia. However, at the same time the prosecutor ignores the fact that in this specific case it is about the defendant's authored song
performed during a legally organized concert, and what follows from the submission by Croatian Composers' Society on the 29th of May 2018 - Croatian Composers Society's registered song.
In addition, the prosecutor ignores the fact that this salute in the context of the creation
of the song - during the Homeland War [Serbian aggression on Croatia – HOC], a 'just, legitimate, defensive and liberating [war]' - is being perceived beyond/without totalitarian or racist context. It is widely known that this song, with its incriminating opening verse, had been
performed on daily basis during the defense of our country in the Homeland War, precisely encouraging and calling for the defense of the homeland, without any connection with the totalitarian regime of some 50 years ago.
Taking into account everything pointed out ... it has not been proven that the disputed salute, which is an integral part of the lyrics of 'Bojna Čavoglave' song, had been performed by the defendant in an explicit connection [!!] with the Ustasha symbols".
During the long & bloody centuries of Croatian Antemurale Christianitatis (the Bulwark of Christendom), Christian Croats fought countless battles against the invading Ottoman armies. Many if not most of these battles resulted in Christian/Croatian victories.
Most Croats today know about the Battle of Krbava Field of 1493, a battle in which Croatian feudal forces had been heavily defeated by the Ottomans (5000-7000 killed, 1500 imprisoned).
Our impression is that few average Croats know about the 1491 battle of Vrpile or the First Battle of Krbava en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of…, a battle in which Croatian forces defeated the Ottomans (1500 killed, 1500 imprisoned).
"From the Croats who came to Dalmatia a part split off and came to rule over Illyricum ... They had an independent ruler who sent envoys but only to the ruler of Croatia out of friendship" – De Administrando Imperio (10th c.)
1/
Byzantine author Niketas Choniates (c. 1150 – died after 1210), writes about efforts by Serb ruler Nemanja in the years 1163 - 1173: "he wants to win over Croatia and takes control over people of Kotor". Political Croatia was west of Neretva river at that time.
2/
Teodor Skutariotas (born c. 1230), another Byzantine chronicler, also wrote on the late 12th century Serbian ruler Nemanja's efforts in spreading on Dioclea/Duklja: "He wants to win over the Croats and takes the rule over Kotor".
3/
In the section Языки и этнический состав (🇬🇧⏬ ) of the #Russian wiki article on Dubrovnik Republic it is stated that according to A-U census of 1890 nobody in Dubrovnik spoke Croatian, while 87% stated that they spoke Serbian: bit.ly/3sswPJw
1/
One reference for this well-known lie is the calendar of the Serb Catholic movement of the late 19th c. Dubrovnik.
The propagandists of that political movement deleted "Croatian" from "Serbo-Croatian" (the latter was the official A-U term for central South Slavic languages)
2/
According to this forged document, 19 denizens of Dubrovnik stated that they spoke Slovenian, while not a single person stated that he or she spoke Croatian.
3) Bosniak nationalists call for (anti-Dayton Peace) hegemony under the "civic" guise. They want to abolish the cantons in FBiH and have "at least" that federal unit of Bosnia and Herzegovina organized as a unitary/centralized Bosniak nation-state. Again, all under "civic" guise;
4) It's not true that "everyone implies Bosnia and Hercegovina when saying 'Bosnia'". Some do use "Bosnia" as a harmless abbreviation for 🇧🇦, but when Bosniak nationalists say "Bosnia", you can bet they mean - a unitary-centralized Bosniak nation state. hrcak.srce.hr/154452
1 of the leading Serbian linguists, also a pathological liar, M. Šćepanović reviewed the reaction of Croatian Academy of Sciences & Arts on the pseudoscientific greater-Serbian Declaration claiming Shtokavian as only Serbian. 🧵⏬novosti.rs/kultura/vesti/…
1/20
He, i.a., said that there are a bunch of documents which prove that all Serbs were/are speakers of Shtokavian. The only problem is that some Serbs were/are speakers of Torlak, but the bigger problem this linguist has is with basic logic:
2/20
If all Serbs are speakers of Shtokavian (and Torlak), that doesn’t mean that all speakers of Shtokavian (and Torlak) were/are – Serbs.
3/20
"It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the main reason Britain did not halt Serb aggression against Bosnia [and Herzegovina - HOC] is that policy makers in Whitehall wanted Serbia and its proxies in Bosnia to prevail" (Sharp 1997: 8) - in: routledge.com/Britain-and-th… 🧵⏬
Britain knows its place in Europe after Brexit - to be the whip of the Hypocritical Empire (🇺🇸) and get treats from it as reward. Sadly the EU is also willingly on the leash of the Empire (see article 👇🏽). Only 🇭🇺 resists. americanaffairsjournal.org/2022/05/the-eu…
One can joke & say that 🇺🇸 Empire learned hypocrisy from 🇬🇧. If Britain (we aren't talking about the common British folk) cared about truth & honour, it would admit that radical Bosniak centralism & desire to create a "civic" state in BiH are destroying Bosnia & Herzegovina.