THREAD: My name is Simon Goddek and I'm a scientist. I was banned from @twitter 538 days ago for stating that mutations usually make viruses less harmful. Although this is scientific consensus, the Ministry of Truth saw an opportunity to silence me.
It’s good to be back! (1/28)
Prior to my permaban, I have been temporarily banned for making the following statements. None of them was misleading or even potentially harmful. I provided @TwitterSupport with scientific evidence supporting my arguments but they refused to reactivate my account. (2/28)
For more than two years, scientists and freedom activists have been silenced under the pretext of a "pandemic". Brave journalists such as @tracybeanz have been muzzled for asking legitimate questions that threatened the deep state and those profiting from its existence. (5/28)
One doesn't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that masks aren't effective against pathogens. #Fauci and @c_drosten, for instance, stated until 2020 that masks "won't stop the virus" and shouldn't be used in case of a pandemic. (6/28)
However, these allegedly corrupt pseudoscientists flip-flopped and suddenly fact checkers declared the truth as fake news and potentially dangerous. Social media platforms consequently banned those who insisted on settled scientific facts. (7/28)
The same applies to the Covid vaccines. Asking simple questions concerning the approval procedure or potential adverse effects got many of us banned. Again @c_drosten and his #TeamScience Minions discredited those who raised questions using the principle of FLICC. (8/28)
Another example of @twitter's totalitarian behaviour was the suppression of the truth regarding Ivermectin and Vitamin D. Those who deliberately ran smear campaigns against these life-saving substances got blue-checked while those posting supportive studies got suspended. (9/28)
It is remarkable that scientists who were doing their job (i.e. raising questions) were banned for doing so but those who created and spread pseudoscientific nonsense such as the Swiss Cheese Model (i.e. @MackayIM) were allowed to stay on Twitter and even got blue-checked (10/28)
As if this wasn't bizarre enough, TeamScience(TM) even has discovered that unvaccinated people are to blame for adverse reactions among vaccinated people. No punchline! That paper passed the peer review process. 🤡 (11/28)
No single mainstream journalist opposed these misanthropic defamations made by these alleged scientists or creepy vaccination campaigns that, for instance, glorified kidnapping and intentional bodily harm. Shame, @Stadt_Wien! (13/28)
This may never happen again, and this global scandal must be fully clarified in every country. It is of utmost importance that the censors and fact-checkers never get the chance to do such damage again. (14/28)
It is obvious that these "current thing" chaps are all very anxious to continue with their climate change narrative. They will not stop until the Orwellian Ministry of Truth is a reality and the Social Credit System is implemented.
(15/28)
Those who are currently stirring up panic about global warming are the same players who have advocated the social exclusion of the unvaccinated and the introduction of compulsory vaccination mandates. (16/28)
It is up to us to fully expose this scandal of global proportions and bring the perpetrators to justice. They will do it again and again if we won't stop them now. (17/28)
And let's get some things straight once and for all:
‣ A real pandemic wouldn't require a 24/7 marketing campaign.
‣ Gaslighting the general public is a crime and should have serious consequences.
(18/28)
‣ The vaccine doesn't prevent the transmission of "the virus" although the opposite was claimed.
‣ The measures were a crime against humanity. Those who are responsible for pushing for them knew this all along.
(19/28)
‣ Fauci, Farrar, Drosten, Koopmans, Andersen and Co. knew about the lab leak since the beginning but are still covering it up.
‣ It's still unclear how Drosten's PCR test made it through peer review within one day. This needs to be investigated. drsimon.substack.com/p/how-scientif…
(20/28)
‣ Testing healthy people is irrational and should never happen again.
‣ Masks are potentially harmful. Their only function is to (1) remind us that we're in a "deadly pandemic", (2) silence critical citizens, and (3) force children into obedience for future 'pandemics'
(21/28)
‣ A PCR test is no diagnostic tool.
‣ A healthy diet, sufficient sleep, exercising and avoiding alcohol should have been promoted by public health experts just like Fauci did before 2020.
(22/28)
‣ If it were really about our health, governments would regulate refined vegetable oils, sugars and drugs (i.e. nicotine and alcohol).
‣ It was illogical that one could take off the mask while sitting in the restaurant, but had to put it on to go to the bathroom.
(23/28)
Instead of getting upset about censorship, I've made good use of the last 18 months. For example, I moved to the Brazilian jungle & I am almost 100% self-sufficient. I generate my own electricity and grow food in my greenhouse. My 20 chickens lay more eggs than I can eat. (24/28)
Since my motto is "don't talk, do!", I invested in a business that will launch a superb vitamin D supplement in January. Follow @sunfluencer and also my account (@goddeketal) to stay updated.
(27/28)
👉🏻 Continue expressing your opinion. Don't comply!
👉🏻 Learn from the past – read old books.
👉🏻 Take responsibility for your own health.
👉🏻 Tell someone you love them. It helps you both.
(1/8)
👉🏻 Stop eating more than 8g of sugar per day (it makes you addicted).
👉🏻 Stop watching p0rn & reduce your alcohol consumption.
👉🏻 Eat lots of pasture meat, and feed bugs to chicken only (@ProfKlausSchwab hates that trick!).
(2/8)
👉🏻 Consume alternative and objective media. Learn how to read and interpret scientific studies.
👉🏻 Learn one new hard skill per week/month (do you know how to ferment food?)
👉🏻 Reject vaccination and CO2 passports, digital IDs and currencies.
1/: The current #COVID crisis goes hand in hand with #journalism. A bubble of complacent journalists writes what is expected of them and what grants them applause from their own profession and the political and social elite that ensnares them. ⬇️A thread⬇️
2/: Dissenting opinions are usually considered "right-winged", and people who criticise their work are Nazis. Even if there are no right-wing populists among the critics, criticism is still dismissed with the argument that it could potentially receive applause from "the right".
3/: With this irrational reasoning, dissidents are silenced, and political measures are legitimised. The majority of journalists do not realise that their subjective and biased reporting increases the risk of descending into authoritarian structures.
1/: The fate of the world as we know it is at stake. Pseudoscience is dominating the news. My appeal is based on the appendix of Michael Crichton's book ‘State of Fear’ that clarifies why politicised science is dangerous. It is more topical than ever. ⬇️a thread⬇️
2/: Imagine a new ‘scientific theory’ that warns of an imminent crisis and points to a way out. This particular theory quickly draws support from mass media, leading scientists, politicians, and celebrities/influencers worldwide. independent.co.uk/life-style/cor…
3/: Research is funded by renowned philanthropists and carried out at prestigious universities and research institutes. The crisis is reported frequently in the media. This science is taught in college and high school classrooms.