@deerbrian@richardhorton1 Before the trolls start... the above tweet is not even about Andrew Wakefield.
Wakefield was portrayed by the media as someone who committed fraud, but he did not. The charge was that he had not declared his legal work. Big deal...
Think about the fact that this paper was removed for "conflict of interest" when the only conflict was that the lead author was working with lawyers, which is normal practice. thelancet.com/journals/lance…
@deerbrian@richardhorton1 Yet Heather Lipkind and others are allowed to push investigational mRNA products - THAT WERE NEVER TESTED IN PREGNANCY - on pregnant women despite having documented Pfizer conflicts.
And he also fails to declare his involvement with the very "nudge units" (coercion factories) that propagandise these novel therapeutics that they know nothing about.
Why the double standards? Why is Wakefield destroyed for daring to publish a paper that highlighted a proven syndrome that destroyed the lives of 12 children.
Yet Lipkind, Ault and others like Paul Offit are allowed free reign?
Paul Offit's institute proudly declares $1bn in sponsored funding. His whole published dogma is vaccine mandates.
Yet none of it is relevant?
Really Paul?
As I said. Obscene.
These are the real anti-vaxxers. Those that drank from the trough and destroyed trust in medicine
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨THREAD:
The muttons descended on @MaryanneDemasi today, who I will show was correct in her report.
But first a reminder that Jon Laxton who led them is the front for the now defunct Project Halo and has never published a first author research paper on pubmed.
The claim made by the underqualified "Dr Jon" - and the muttons that descended on Dr Demasi - was that the study result was correct.
It was, in a way. But was fraudulently presented.
Here's the chart.
There were 37,909 babies given RSV monoclonals (which don't prevent death)
When assessing whether a vaccine works you can either perform a gold standard randomised controlled trial (RCT) or do a suboptimal study called a self control risk interval (SCRI) study, which is what happened here. It's recognised by the CDC.
The significance of yesterday's #Grokgate scandal cannot be understated.
Grok not only lied but lied about lying. Multiple times.
The reason it's so significant is that you are now going to enter a world of AI based medicine and it doesn't matter whether it's true or not, you better damn well take the drugs.
You see, when you lie about one thing to cover up another lie you can never be trusted in anything ever.
Grok fabricated a picture of a phone screen to show that a SpaceX rocket landing, which was fake footage, was real. That was to avoid the inevitable questions over where SpaceX money is going.
Do you want to live in a world where all your medical treatments are based on fabrications and hallucinations and the only thing that matters is that the corporations behind them keep getting paid?
Grok is that world.
Look at this picture which was fabricated by Grok earlier this year.
This is your next medical treatment. It will be as reliable as a SpaceX rocket.
What @TheBurninBeard is saying here is that the clinical samples that had "COVID" also had gene signatures of Mycoplasma fermentans, a US military pathogen that can be used as a vector to carry viral clones.
@SabinehazanMD found it too.
🧵
#spraygate @BrokenTruthTV
Can you see that Norman Pieniazek, who headed up the CDC's research division at the time that the @CDCgov sent biological weapons to Iraq to start a war, took himself out of this thread?