Thread by @IndividualPira1

$CHNG vs $FSN
I think it's time for a thread to compare various strengths and weaknesses of these very related currencies. Many who are new to @FinanceChainge only see and think $CHNG, because it is what is primarily promoted. But let's dive a little deeper.

Everything that @FinanceChainge does is handled through @FUSIONProtocol where $FSN is the gas in the same way as $ETH on #Ethereum $AVAX on #Avalanche $MATIC on #Polygon $BNB on #BSC, etc, etc. But @FUSIONProtocol go beyond these in a couple of ways.

1. @FUSIONProtocol acts as a router between all chains in the @FinanceChainge cross-chain solution. It's really the holy grail that things like @routerprotocol and @unizen_io are still only starting to build. In the meantime @FUSIONProtocol is already battle tested for years.

For $FSN this means that regarsdless what chains a @FinanceChainge user wants to move assets between or what assets they want to swap $FSN is always used as the gas under the hood.

2. @FUSIONProtocol also distinguishes itself in how it can define assets in time. Time is an integral part of the network and assets can be defined or split into parts by time. This is what enables the @FinanceChainge time-framing and options to work.

But these time functions also have a large unfilled potential in leasing markets, which can come to life once NFTs are deeply integrated with real world items. There exists heaps of untapped opportunities for which a network like @FUSIONProtocol. The technology is also patented.

$FSN also has extremely strong tokenomics. The original "team" tokens are already sold off. CEXs dumped it to bits. Basically everyone who has $FSN has bought it or used their $FSN to earn more $FSN. It's gone through its very long bad phase and is currently showing strength,

On fusionite.info/fsn-1 you can read some more on Tokenomics. It's kind of in between Ethereum (PoS) and Bitcoin (Halvings, slowly moving to a fixed max supply). Might even have been one of the very first PoS EVMs to launch.

So, enough about strengths. Let's look at weaknesses. @FUSIONProtocol does not have a big team working on it. It's a small but effective team led by Philip Fan under the guidance of @djqianfusion. Old devs like @zhaojun_sh might show up for support if absolutely required.

But with the success of @FinanceChainge it is possible that we see this change. More workers might be brought back to @FUSIONProtocol in order to assure its success. It might even get its own marketing, which is the other huge weakness.

Basically all marketing efforts relating to @FUSIONProtocol are eaten up by @FinanceChainge. As a result the official website is for example very out of date. And new investors often get very irritated about lack of marketing, or failure to keep very simple things up to date.

Don't try to change this if you invest in $FSN. For now it is what it is. It'll only lead to frustrations and it'll be that way until the time is right. See $FSN more like @Bitcoin. A solid project that runs fine on its own. It doesn't really need a team or a CEO working on it.

Even though that wouldn't hurt, it has showed that it can survive almost on its own as long as some other big projects are using it and building ontop. And currently there's a very huge and promising one. Namely @FinanceChainge. After it is a roaring success, more action comes.

This didn't become as much of a comparison as I hoped, so I'll just complete it with some scores.
FSN
Tokenomics 5/5
Team 2/5
Hype 2/5
Potential 5/5
Safety 5/5
CHNG
Tokenomics 3/5
team 5/5
Hype 5/5
Potential 5/5
Safety 3/5

The safety score is mostly about potential downside. High score means the risk for down side is extremely low.