#SupremeCourt will today hear petitions against Haldwani railway land eviction
More than 4,000 families are facing eviction from railway land in Haldwani’s Banbhoolpura area after an Uttarakhand HC order directed the removal of encroachments
Gonsalves: the possession of the land has been with the petitioners since prior independence and that they have been in possession of the govt leases which were executed in their favour
Gonsalves: HC order notes that the railway act is a special act and that it self eradicates the applicability of the public premises act since railways is a special act
Adv Prashant Bhushan: most of the orders under PP Act are ex parte and without given hearing #HaldwaniEviction#SupremeCourt
Justice Kaul: they claim leases and some say they migrated post 1947 and these properties were auctioned.. development has to be allowed but people stayed for so long then rehabilitation has to be allowed. How can you ask to clear in 7 days?
Justice Kaul: what is troubling us is how do you deal with a situation where people bought in auction and took possession after 1947 and acquired title. you may acquire the land but what to do now. people lived for 60-70 years some rehabilitation has to be done
ASG: But they say it is their land and they did not claim rehabilitation
Adv Vipin Nair: i was the original petitioner in HC and we always prayed for rehabilitation
Justice Kaul: there must be a culmination to the issue and we do not encourage what is going on
Justice Kaul: even in those cases where there are no rights at all even in them rehabilitation has to be done. but in some cases where they acquired title.. you have to find a solution. there is a human angle to this issue.
Justice Oka: some one has to carry out demarcation
Bhushan: all orders have been passed in this case ex parte during the COVID period
ASG: Each of the intervention applications have been separately dealt with by the high court.
ASG: due process has been followed
Justice oka: this is a human issue. orders were passed during covid period
Justice kaul: you cannot cut short the process.. this is a human issue. some have claimed their land and you have to develop the land. someone has to examine
ASG: There was illegal mining in the area.
Justice Kaul: we do not want you to be displaced and thrown out overnight. #Haldwani
Justice Kaul: Someone will have to go into the assessments of the problems involved. You must make sure there is no further occupation or construction. we have to find a practical way out. it is not a mere encroachment. lot of things will weigh due to nature of rights conferred
ASG: This is critical for development of the state. it is critical since it is the gate to Uttarakhand
Justice Kaul: there has to be a methodology to achieve the means.
ASG: We have followed the law and pursued cases under PP Act
Justice Kaul: it cant be both ways some methodology has to be found out.
SC ORDER: ASG emphasized the need for railways. Moot point will be to consider stand of state on whether land is of railways or belongs partly to state. Next is to consider tittle of lands acquired..
SC: There cannot be uprooting of 50 thousand people overnight. there has to be segregation of people who have no right on the land and the need to rehabilitation while recognizing the need of railways #HaldwaniEviction#SupremeCourt
Bombay High Court is hearing plea by Johnson and Johnson company challenging the orders restraining them from manufacturing baby powder in their facility in Mumbai suburbs.
Court: This is a matter of some concern for everyone. If there is some problem wih any pharmaceutical product. We want the regulator to act swiftly. We cannot act like regilator. We do not understand what the solution.
Court: You took a sample in 2019 and then the notice was issued in 2022. What do we do when
You did not issue notice for 3 years.
Supreme Court refuses to intervene in 2019 Bombay High Court’s order directing for demolition of 114-year-old National Insurance Building situated at Worli in Mumbai #SupremeCourt
CJI DY Chandrachud: HC had observed that having regard to frame of proceedings it was not entering into any disputed questions of title
CJI: There is no reason to interfere with HC judgment which has accepted municipal corporation report which says building was in dilapidated condition
Delhi High Court will soon hear a plea filed by @AltNews co-founder Mohammed Zubair challenging an FIR lodged against him by Delhi Police for allegedly "threatening and torturing" a minor girl on Twitter. #DelhiHighCourt@zoo_bear#MohammedZubair
Delhi High Court stays proceedings before the trial court in the defamation case filed by Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia against BJP leaders Hans Raaj Hans and Manjinder Singh Sirsa. #DelhiHighCourt@msisodia#ManjinderSinghSirsa#Hansrajhans
Supreme Court directs Director General of State of UP to file a personal affidavit showing if UP has followed the judgment of SC which stated that state was duty bound to consider premature release in terms of its own policy without any application to be filed
CJI DY Chandrachud: DG of State of UP shall file a personal affidavit setting out the details: 1. Number of steps taken in pursuance of the judgment in Rashidul and the institutional arrangements put in place,
CJI: 2. How many convicts are eligible for premature release district wise, 3. How many cases have been considered for premature release since the judgment of Rashidul Zafar,