BREAKING: After uncovering gross incompetence (or negligence) at the TGA @SenatorRennick asked them what they did about the clearly contaminated batches.
Does anybody believe any more that the same group of people working for Ecohealth in Australia "discovered" another "novel" bat virus - this time a retrovirus?
It's a massive paper for someone with a limited bio.
Who did the sample collections?
What BSL level lab were these mutation experiments conducted?
Did you induce these mutations with APOBEC? @Daoyu15@humblesci
New FOI release from @USRightToKnow confirms that the Latinne paper - the subject of Peter Daszak's secrecy in respect of missing Genbank sequences - was submitted in August 2019. It discussed the origin of SARS-Cov-2, first touted in Dec 2019 @Daoyu15
🧀🧀🧀
436 BILLION copies of spike protein circulating freely in plasma, a month after the Gene therapy vaccine.
In kids.
Their hearts will never fully recover.
You knew that, didn't you?
But there is more than that here...
THREAD [repost]
👇👇👇
Note: This is a repost of an earlier thread that contained an important typo that I felt required a full thread rather than a correction at the end.
To avoid any claims of "misinformation" given how important this is, and how much the thread took off.
Let's resume
👇👇👇
This is the damning graphic.
The vertical scale is a log scale.
The line at about 15pg/ml is the limit of detection, which is why the blue dots are there. There are still up to 100 billion molecules of spike in those patients - 20 days later.
The EMA knew about these humps because they had them analysed. But only to a point.
Not only did they ONLY perform on analysis on the assumption of what they THOUGHT was in the product, but they accepted what now appear to be synthetic Western blots as evidence.
Li-Meng Yan is so incensed that I dared to question the #CCP narrative that she not only retweeted her own tweet (which misrepresented mine) but I received a whole host of CCP bot followers and trolls.
Just to clarify, the tweet was a rebuttal of some account that claimed I had "lost credibility".
There was no disparaging of any tragedy.
It was purely about the staging of the picture....
No problem, just unfollow me.
So why did Li-Meng take such an interest?
So whose side is she on?
I have never been sure since in her first account she seemed to promote the mRNA vaccines.
In this account she is mixed.