π§π§π§
436 BILLION copies of spike protein circulating freely in plasma, a month after the Gene therapy vaccine.
In kids.
Their hearts will never fully recover.
You knew that, didn't you?
But there is more than that here...
THREAD [repost]
πππ
Note: This is a repost of an earlier thread that contained an important typo that I felt required a full thread rather than a correction at the end.
To avoid any claims of "misinformation" given how important this is, and how much the thread took off.
Let's resume
πππ
This is the damning graphic.
The vertical scale is a log scale.
The line at about 15pg/ml is the limit of detection, which is why the blue dots are there. There are still up to 100 billion molecules of spike in those patients - 20 days later.
But in some of these cases the concentration of spike is RISING 20 days after vaccination (see the red lines going up), so we have no idea how much is actually circulating.
Spike is toxic, particularly to the heart. If it's not toxic why do we need a "vaccine" against it?
The authors claim that the mean serum level of free spike protein in the patients with myocarditis was 34pg/ml.
(There was less in the non-affected patients, but there was still a lot)
How many molecules is that?
Well there is about 3000ml of plasma in a 70kg male...
And the mol weight of a spike protein monomer is 141kDa. That's 2.34 e-19 grams.
So 34pg/ml x 3000ml is a total of 102ng (102e-9) of spike.
Divide by 2.34e-19 gives you...
435,897,435,897 molecules.
Of a toxic protein.
Circulating in a young adult.
It's worth noting also that the blue dots in the graphic don't indicate "no spike" - they are the lower limits of detection at 15pg/ml. That's a lot of spike.
BUT...
There are two other things that have come out of this paper.
The first is that the amount of spike protein circulating in the PLASMA (when we were told it didn't leave the arm, remember) weeks after the injection is shocking.
But the worst thing about the Yonker #myocarditis study is this - and you might not have realised.
The study showed, beyond a shadow of doubt, that the COVID "vaccine" was causing myocarditis, with elevated troponin (confirming heart damage).
Well, that's a problem
It's a problem because the study authors should have raised an alarm after the first two or three cases.
You see, that was their duty. It was a duty as medical officers and as research officers.
But to our knowledge they said nothing and kept recruiting.
But it didn't matter that young people were getting myocarditis (with a known 5-year mortality of up to 50%). What mattered is finishing the study so they could publish.
Of course, from the home of the #surgisphere authors, what else would you expect?
Keep jabbing.
Thank you to the #mousearmy helpers who pointed out the previous wording error in the post.
Please feel free to add your own description of the number 435,897,435,897 in the comments!
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.
Why?
I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.
That was a lie.
It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.
We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.
So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.
Here is the clip from the (decent) interview with Pelle Neroth Taylor of @RealTNTRadio.
In it Boyle is asked whether the mRNA vaccines are themselves biological weapons and he explains that because "in your system, it generates the COVID-19 cells" they would be.
But of course that's incorrect, because mRNA vaccines don't recreate the COVID virus (the biological weapon - assuming as we now know that it was synthetic not natural).
So his explanation was incorrect because he misunderstood that the mRNA only provides the spike protein and he would have been destroyed on this point in court.
Of course he never got to court. And never gave an affidavit for the Dutch court - confirmed here (8/3/25):
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.
A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.