π§π§π§
436 BILLION copies of spike protein circulating freely in plasma, a month after the Gene therapy vaccine.
In kids.
Their hearts will never fully recover.
You knew that, didn't you?
But there is more than that here...
THREAD [repost]
πππ
Note: This is a repost of an earlier thread that contained an important typo that I felt required a full thread rather than a correction at the end.
To avoid any claims of "misinformation" given how important this is, and how much the thread took off.
Let's resume
πππ
This is the damning graphic.
The vertical scale is a log scale.
The line at about 15pg/ml is the limit of detection, which is why the blue dots are there. There are still up to 100 billion molecules of spike in those patients - 20 days later.
But in some of these cases the concentration of spike is RISING 20 days after vaccination (see the red lines going up), so we have no idea how much is actually circulating.
Spike is toxic, particularly to the heart. If it's not toxic why do we need a "vaccine" against it?
The authors claim that the mean serum level of free spike protein in the patients with myocarditis was 34pg/ml.
(There was less in the non-affected patients, but there was still a lot)
How many molecules is that?
Well there is about 3000ml of plasma in a 70kg male...
And the mol weight of a spike protein monomer is 141kDa. That's 2.34 e-19 grams.
So 34pg/ml x 3000ml is a total of 102ng (102e-9) of spike.
Divide by 2.34e-19 gives you...
435,897,435,897 molecules.
Of a toxic protein.
Circulating in a young adult.
It's worth noting also that the blue dots in the graphic don't indicate "no spike" - they are the lower limits of detection at 15pg/ml. That's a lot of spike.
BUT...
There are two other things that have come out of this paper.
The first is that the amount of spike protein circulating in the PLASMA (when we were told it didn't leave the arm, remember) weeks after the injection is shocking.
But the worst thing about the Yonker #myocarditis study is this - and you might not have realised.
The study showed, beyond a shadow of doubt, that the COVID "vaccine" was causing myocarditis, with elevated troponin (confirming heart damage).
Well, that's a problem
It's a problem because the study authors should have raised an alarm after the first two or three cases.
You see, that was their duty. It was a duty as medical officers and as research officers.
But to our knowledge they said nothing and kept recruiting.
But it didn't matter that young people were getting myocarditis (with a known 5-year mortality of up to 50%). What mattered is finishing the study so they could publish.
Of course, from the home of the #surgisphere authors, what else would you expect?
Keep jabbing.
Thank you to the #mousearmy helpers who pointed out the previous wording error in the post.
Please feel free to add your own description of the number 435,897,435,897 in the comments!
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just putting this into context. @DrCatharineY was originally DOD then published on a DARPA grant. One of her few co-authors is Stephanie Petzing of the "Center for Global Health Engagement"
All one big OneHealth family to nudge you into believing this @epiphare slop is real.
For the explanation as to why these "real world data" with "data not available" publications are absolutely junk and shouldn't be accepted to any major journal please see arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-β¦
Dr Young (DARPA/DOD) is clearly now working as an ambassador to cover for the actions of the corrupt Biden regime who we are learning covered up huge amounts of adverse events from their COVID program whilst funding pharma in the "cancer moonshot"
It looks like we found our vector.
They moved from spraying live (cloned) viruses to putting them in drinking water.. which we thought wasn't possible due to chlorine.
Well, it turns out that it is, if you use a stabiliser.
The @NIH told us that they stopped funding GOFROC research but they clearly didn't.
This is a modified live virus. That is, they took a pathogenic influenza and genetically modified it and propagated it using infectious clones (reverse genetics). nature.com/articles/s4154β¦
"MLVs were diluted in distilled water containing Vac-Pac Plus (Best Veterinary 418 Solutions, Columbus, GA, USA) to neutralize residual chlorine and adjust the pH"
There are a lot of pharma agents celebrating on twitter recently because the now-conflicted @cochranecollab dropped their standards and published something on HPV vaccination they didn't understand.
To explain it you need to understand the difference between the two studies quoted.
The first (Bergman) analysed a bunch of real studies (including RCTs) and concluded that the effect on cancer couldn't be seen - despite nearly 20 years of follow up.
The second (Henschke) cherry picked a bunch of "real world data" studies and concluded that the vaccine prevented a gazillion cervical cancers, pretending that it analysed 132 million patient records. It did nothing of the sort. What it did was look at two studies, take out the bit where it showed that the vaccine increased the risk of cancer (Kjaer 2021, over 20s) - replicated in multiple country statistics, split them into three studies, ignore the other studies showing the opposite, and ignore the fact that none of this data is verifiable.
Notably, one of the major studies (Palmer 2024, which was found to be seriously flawed) has been excluded from the meta-analysis because it did not show a cancer benefit in the under 16 age group.
It is very difficult to "fix" a randomised controlled trial.
It is very easy to "fix" a meta-analysis of observational studies where the data is "not available".
There is a huge difference between "real" studies and "real world data" studies because the latter are cherry picked or even fully synthetic, and the authors don't have access to the data. They are produced by vested interests groups to sell a narrative.
This was the most corrupted review that Cochrane have ever performed and this time they shot themselves in the foot by contradicting their own reviews. cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10β¦
your childish insults drew my attention to your lab's quite incredible paper confirming that chronic activation of cGAS-STING, as happens with plasmid-contaminated vaccines, causes cancer.
Retraction Watch busted for collusion with Rolf Marschalek, who is not only part of BioNtech's Goethe university..
but - get this - their Corona fund was pump primed by the Quandt family - infamous for their role in Nazi Germany.
The dude keeps going, but betrays that this is a copycat to a bunch of accounts linked to one dubbed "Penguin" that only appeared when I pointed out the Joe Sansone scam that is being coordinated by Sasha Latypova to derail legal cases.