#SupremeCourt to hear petitions challenging Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act.
The 1991 Act mandates that character of all religious places of worship should be maintained as it was on August 15, 1947 and no suit or proceeding shall in this regard.
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: this is an act and a legislation and you cannot have a PIL in this which challenges this law and the judgment of this court which has taken a view and how can the verdict be reviewed. This is not a dispute regarding a structure..#placesofworshipact
CJI: Mr Sibal raises some preliminary objections regarding maintainability and we will hear it when we commence hearing
Adv Vrinda Grover: there are dipsutes regarding Gyanvapi or Idgah mosque and is in direct breach of this act. centre is not taking a stand and all kinds of litigation is taking place. we can frame issues only after union submits a reply
#Breaking Delhi High Court dismisses a PIL by Association for Democratic Reforms demanding constitution of an independent tribunal or committee to oversee the enforcement of #FCRA. #DelhiHighCourt#ADR@adrspeaks
A Bench of CJ Satish Chandra Sharma and J Subramonium Prasad holds that mere possibility that a statute will not be administered adequately is not ground for the statute to be invalidated or for the Court to supplement its wisdom with the Legislature’s.
“To set up a committee or tribunal is a purely policy decision. The legislature alone has the power to set up a tribunal or committee, under the requisite statute, to adjudicate disputes arising from it...
A Constitution Bench of the #SupremeCourt led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to hear petitions regarding the tussle between the AAP-led Delhi government vs the LG over control over services in the national capital.
#SupremeCourt Constitution Bench led by CJI Chandrachud to hear pleas regarding the political crisis in Maharashtra arising out of the fall of the Uddhav Thackeray-led government.