@Grayscale will soon file the next brief in our suit challenging SEC's decision to deny $GBTC conversion to a spot #Bitcoin#ETF. The case is moving swiftly. While timing is uncertain, oral arguments may be as soon as Q2. Final decision in DC Cir. App. Court could come by Fall.🧵
2/ A lot has happened in the #crypto industry since we first filed our lawsuit in June ‘22, but I continue to believe in the strength and merits of our common sense and compelling legal arguments:
3/ Our lawsuit is about determinations on *questions of law*. Despite the SEC’s historical reluctance, or current perceptions of the #crypto industry more generally, this is a legal case about fair and equal treatment under the law.
4/ That means events and speculation surrounding Terra/LUNA, 3AC, Celsius, Voyager, FTX, Alameda, BlockFi, Genesis Capital, Gemini, DCG, or anyone else are *not* relevant to the ultimate question the Court will have to answer:
5/ Did the SEC act arbitrarily and capriciously, and discriminate against issuers, in denying the conversion of $GBTC to a spot #bitcoin#ETF after it approved ETFs that hold bitcoin futures (a derivative of $BTC)?
That’s it.
6/ Americans want and deserve spot #bitcoin ETFs, as they would further open up access to $BTC for those that want to hold it in the form of a security, in their brokerage or retirement account, thru regulated investment vehicles, with SEC reports, audited financials and tax docs
7/ That may not be you, and that's okay, but if you support the Bitcoin protocol, I think it's clear why you would want more ways for people to access $BTC –
even if they're wrapped in something else on a 1:1 basis. We are fighting for all those who believe in #Bitcoin's future
8/ So if you’re long #Bitcoin – whether that’s because you self-custody your private key(s) on a piece of paper, cryptosteel, hardware wallet, a brainwallet in your head, or entrust them to a third party – I encourage you to support our #ETF case.
9/ But this case is *most important* for the 850k+ shareholders who hold $GBTC. That’s because we expect converting GBTC to a spot #bitcoin ETF to effectively close the current discount to NAV and unlock over $4 billion of value.
10/ An ETF is unquestionably the best long-term way for $GBTC to track the value of its #bitcoin. This has always been the roadmap for GBTC (and $ETHE and our other #crypto investment funds). That’s why the full resources of the firm are behind this effort.
11/ We have the best legal minds representing $GBTC shareholders in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, including Don Verrilli, former Solicitor General under the Obama administration, his team at MTO and Davis Polk.
12/ In legal circles, Don needs no introduction. For those who don’t know, the Solicitor General is the attorney who represents the US Government before the Supreme Court. He and I talked about the case after he joined our team last Summer: grayscale.com/don-verrilli-c…
13/ And for anyone who doubts our commitment, I encourage you to revisit our 100 page Opening Brief. TLDR can be found in the Intro (pp. 12-14) and Summary of Argument (pp. 30-33), which get to the importance of this case and core of our arguments: grayscale.com/wp-content/upl…
14/ Our Opening Brief was bolstered by 5 Amicus Briefs, which included valuable, unique, and high-quality perspectives from the TradFi sector, #crypto trade associations, think tanks, advocacy groups, academics and former SEC, CFTC and OCC regulators:
16/ While we remain confident the Court will rule in our favor, we've also committed to exploring alternative paths to returning capital to $GBTC shareholders if our legal challenge is not successful.
17/ These options could include a tender offer for a portion of $GBTC shares, subject to receipt of certain relief and approvals from the SEC, as outlined by @Sonnenshein: grayscale.com/end-of-year-ce…
18/ Pursuing an alternative path would deviate from $GBTC's long-held ETF aspirations and would not be an ideal outcome, as it would effectively mean that regulators have shut the door on efficient access to $BTC through US-regulated investment vehicles.
19/ And for those who have a long-term investment horizon and want to maintain their #bitcoin exposure, the ETF structure is a far better outcome vs. partially exiting through a tender offer.
20/ Nonetheless, we made this commitment in continuing to prepare for all possible $GBTC scenarios and to provide clarity for investors, while holding firm in our belief that a spot #bitcoin ETF is a matter of when, not if.
21/ As a side note: anyone telling you $GBTC can simply redeem shares today is most likely not a lawyer, and doesn’t understand the complexities of securities laws and its tender offers rules (distinct from Reg M).
22/ Just as there are approvals needed to convert $GBTC to an ETF and operate an ongoing redemption, there are other distinct approvals needed for GBTC to fairly return capital to shareholders in other ways, such as through a tender offer.
23/ To reiterate, converting $GBTC to a spot #bitcoin ETF is the best long-term way for it to track the value of its $BTC. Our case is moving forward swiftly, we have strong, common sense and compelling legal arguments and we’re optimistic that the Court should rule in our favor.
24/ We will continue to fight for this for our investors and the #bitcoin community. As always, those interested can stay apprised of the litigation here: grayscale.com/gbtc-lawsuit/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Last night our attorneys at Davis Polk sent a letter to the SEC arguing that approval of #Bitcoin futures-based ETFs, but not #Bitcoin spot-based ETFs, like $GBTC, is “arbitrary and capricious,” and therefore in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
This is a new argument in the context of $BTC ETFs that wasn’t possible until the approval of the first #Bitcoin futures-based #ETF and subsequent rejection of yet another spot-based ETF. So, what is this new argument?:
The APA requires the SEC to treat *like* situations *alike* absent a reasonable basis for different treatment. This means the SEC must treat similarly situated investment products similarly.