The exchange should never lose money if a customer gets liquidated. There is no excuse giving you hedge fund alameda an account with liquidation turned off.
2/
All this talk about what Alameda did is misdirection. It doesn’t matter how they hedged or didn’t hedge, or what dogshit was in their portfolio.
3/
If you want to do some explaining tell us why you thought it was a good idea to give your hedge fund an account with the liquidation feature turned off?
4/ If you had liquidated Alameda like any other FTX punter, FTX would still be operational. It’s just that simple.
5/
So stop talking about Alameda and tell us how you approached risk management at the FTX level. Why were some clients treated differently than others. I am keen to understand why you thought turning off liquidation on a $bn notional position was prudent.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ What happens now that Baron CZ passed on FTX bailout and SBF is bankrupt. The next question is who could save FTX?
2/
If CZ, the richest person in #crypto, can't do the deal. No one can do the deal.
3/ FTX customer deposits will only see recovery in a bankruptcy court, and that will take many years to sort out. Mt Gox creditors still haven't received funds and it's been almost a decade.
1/ There is a #China health presser tomorrow, if this tweet is true, and the rumours onshore that Xi may ditch COVID zero in a matter of weeks it might explain a few things.
2/ The US Treasury is thinking about supplying the market with more short term T-bills to alleviate a shortage.
3/ Money Market Funds like short term T-bills, but there ain't enough so they park their money in the Fed's reverse repo facility. It earns a similar yield. Credit risk is also a factor, but let's keep this simple for twitter.
3/ They did a "test" trade with the ECB and SNB totaling $3.3billi that settled Oct 6th. Gotta make sure the pipes work, don't want to get sabotaged like Nordstream I and II.