2/ 1. BvS (Extended) and ZSJL (both 5 stars, I can't decide which I like more) 2. Man of Steel (4 stars - it has problems with a slightly clunky script, but come on!) 3. Wonder Woman (4 Stars - almost as good as Man of Steel but doesn't have Snyder's flare)
...
5. Black Adam (3.5 Stars - a really solid, enjoyable and much underrated superhero film) 6. Aquaman (3 stars - profoundly OK, a bit too silly for my tastes but takes some of the good from MoS & also boasts wonderful underwater visuals) 7. Suicide Squad (2 Stars: it was butchered)
8. Josstice League (2 stars - surprisingly watchable if you don't care about basic standards of quality, and kind of rounds out Superman's arc - but not really). 9. The Suicide Squad (2 Stars - It's James Gunn, and not to my taste)
10. Shazam (don't know, as I couldn't quite be bothered) 11. Birds of Prey (don't know, as I definitely couldn't be bothered)
12. Wonder Woman 1984 (3 stars - should have come earlier in my list as it's a guilty pleasure for me, like Superman 3, which most people also hate).
That's it. What do you think?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@BarnabyRaine@Pragmatic_Keith@OwenJones84 1/ Thanks for replying. I'm disagreeing with the premise of your argument & the concept of paranoia on both sides. Not v. clear from my tweet (my error). But your argument is that the situation you reconstructed & I quoted was caused by paranoia created by mutual misunderstanding
@BarnabyRaine@Pragmatic_Keith@OwenJones84 2/ Your argument hinges on the untestable, unverifiable notion that antisemitism (or "anti-semitism") exists as a "structure of feeling". That someone could, in your analysis, say "Zionist" & mean "Jew" opens the door to a total descent into unjustified paranoia. Nevertheless...
@BarnabyRaine@Pragmatic_Keith@OwenJones84 3/ Your argument that there is "good reason for thinking that anti-Semitic attitudes are likely to be dramatically more widespread than is usually thought" suggests that "paranoia" over anti-Semitism is not, in fact irrational. In other words...
1/ If true, it is a sign that @wbd has learnt nothing from Josstice League about audiences & expectation management. Is the Matt Reeves grim & gritty Batman audience the same as the jokey James Gunn audience? Almost certainly not. #SellZSJLtoNetflix#SellSnyderVerseToNetflix
2/ Just as Snyder's fans were alienated/infuriated by Joss Whedon's Justice League, so will be true of Reeve's Batman audience when encountering Gunn's cartoonish expectation subverting Superman. Or there is another explanation... #SellZSJLtoNetflix#SellSnyderVerseToNetflix
3/ ... That the Gunnverse isn't planned to properly materialise before the likely 2024 takeover, which means the only DCU projects to be announced will be Batman related. This would be a face saving measure for Gunn & @wbd, and a way to put off producing film franchises that...
1/ Thread to explain where my thoughts on this come from. The work of the Zionist movement founder, Theodor Herzl. Herzl conceived of a Jewish state as requiring the support of the European Powers: "Immigration is futile unless we have the sovereign right"...
2/ Herzl's logic was paternalistic, premised upon the idea of European style economic development. In his recognition of the need for backing by colonial powers is admission that the existing population might not appreciate the advantages brought by the colonists.
3/ Immigration alone wouldn't work, so imperial backing would be needed if & when the matter needed to be forced. Hence the importance of the Balfour declaration addressed to Lord Rothschild, a leading figure in the British Zionist movement in 1917.
1/ I fear @jeremycorbyn may end up politically isolated when he's finally expelled from Labour. If you think present allies in Labour will maintain their association, precedent suggests otherwise. Stringing him along until nxt GE makes sense for #Starmer...
2/ It means @jeremycorbyn might be reluctant to formally break with Labour in the hope he's reinstated, which won't happen. The result is that coordinated resistance from socialists won't build until after GE, when Starmer assumes he'll be in power anyway (hmmm)
3/ Not breaking from #Labour makes sense from a local politics perspective in Islington. To win at the nxt GE, @jeremycorbyn will need local Labour support so it could be a mistake to give the impression that he's wilfully deserted them. He'll need their loyalty.
1/ Yet more on @dontpayuk. Sorry to keep posting about this but it's I feel it's important to do what I can prevent influential people from parroting the utter crap that this awful "campaign" keeps pushing. My sense is they are struggling to cope with the scrutiny... #dontpayuk
2/ The latest nonsense is purveyed through EuroNews. A #Dontpay representative is now telling their audience that it's all fine because socially minded lawyers are in abundance, and ready able and willing to help anyone who gets into trouble with energy bill non payment
3/ Even if you are eligible for legal aid, it might not cover the full cost and there's no guarantee you'll win. In truth, this seems unlikely if people simply cut off Direct Debits and breach contracts without first seeking resolution.
1/ Privatisation of the energy by the Government makes this a political issue not. Pressuring politicians and political parties may be more effective than the don't pay campaign. Ultimately we want a political solution renationalisation. Don't pay isn't about that. #dontpayuk
2/ The question then becomes: "what's the best way of pressuring politicians"?
In this sense, the don't the dispersed nature of the private action urged by #dontpayuk is, in a sense the very opposite of the sustained collective pressure needed to secure policy change.
3/ Simply trying to hurt the finances of energy companies - which can be bailed out by government politicians - is both risky and misdirected energy. There is a real chance it will make no difference except to negatively impact the people refusing to pay.