Before it goes down the memory hole, these are the comments to a 17 year old girl who was showering when a man walked in naked. She was understandably upset. Understandable to most of us. Here are some of the choice replies to her.
This seemed to be a common theme. Dozens of comments about her looks.
Former YMCA employee.
Weaponizing her tears is a common theme.
And for anyone who didn’t see the video in question:
Remember, this is a teenager. All those comments were said to a teenager.
Are we allowed to say the word? This is ______ing. This is teaching girls to ignore their boundaries.
After all this time and people STILL do not get it. Here is some guy thinking there is a compromise. A simple way to “get along”. If only we’d be less obstinate. More forgiving. More understanding. But he has NO clue what is being asked. 1/
He thinks you can compromise. He thinks you can live and let live. He doesn’t understand that his suggestion here would have been equally seen as a h@te incident and he too would have been suspended or reported to the police for suggesting it. 2/
Sandie’s boss wanted to call the police on her for not wanting to get undressed in front of a man who walked into the ladies changing room.
He wanted to call the police on her!!
Jamie Doyle, NHS Fife’s head of nursing for acute services, wrote an email saying this. 1/
I wish I was making this up. I don’t think people have any idea how sadistic some true believers of this ideology have become. They wanted to call the police on her bc she wanted the privacy the law entitles her to. That’s how far this has gone.
2/
It’s utterly unfathomable that this ideology has progressed to this level.
This is not some fringe issue that affects no one. This is a nurse’s boss.
This is HUGE!! During the tribunal, the witness has lapsed into calling Dr Upton “he”. Jane Russell can’t have that and breaks in to remind the witness that we are all playing a game!
This sounds to me like suborning perjury but what do I know. 1/.
She claims the witness is getting confused bc Naomi keeps (properly) referring to Dr. Upton as “he”. Then she tries to claim that standards dictate this witness lie. She claims that Naomi is creating a hostile environment!! Talk about projection! 2/
Jane asks Naomi to “reflect on her language used in court.”
The judge asks Naomi if she wants to say anything or have time to reflect. Naomi comes back with THE perfect answer:
After 21 million views, here is a summary of the response to the new “feature” Ani.
The response to Ani is “overwhelmingly negative”. The negative comments come from (surprise) predominantly male users. 1/
The responses to this new character are “overwhelmingly negative”. The backlash stems from concerns about the s*xualized nature of Ani and the undermining of human connections.
2/
People responded that these “companions” could foster isolation. They argue that this feature seemingly contradicts Musk’s stance on declining birth rates. They find it inappropriate and potentially harmful’. 3/
Lesbian Action Group has written a brief on behalf of Sall Grover in the case of Giggle v Tickle.
“it is now commonplace for lesbians to be pressured into having six with transwomen, and to face risk of social isolation if they do not agree with that very concept.”
1/
Giggle is an app that @salltweets created for women only. Mr. Tickle demanded access to it & Sall said no. 2/
That’s it. She just said no. The question in this case is essentially whether women are allowed to say no.
It’s an important case and it is crazy expensive to fight. All that guy has to do is make a demand and Sall’s world is turned upside down. 3/