Before it goes down the memory hole, these are the comments to a 17 year old girl who was showering when a man walked in naked. She was understandably upset. Understandable to most of us. Here are some of the choice replies to her.
This seemed to be a common theme. Dozens of comments about her looks.
Former YMCA employee.
Weaponizing her tears is a common theme.
And for anyone who didn’t see the video in question:
Remember, this is a teenager. All those comments were said to a teenager.
Are we allowed to say the word? This is ______ing. This is teaching girls to ignore their boundaries.
A new study is out and it shows that after medical intervention things get worse, not better. Which is what we’ve been saying all along. This “gender affirming care” is worse than snake oil. It’s damaging.
Thread. A story you may have missed from Fresno California. The shelter is called Naomi house. It’s for women who have no homes and live on the street. One of the requirements was the women take regular group showers.
When a man arrived they were forced to shower with him!
You can imagine exactly what he was like and you’d be right. He was dirty, gross, lewd, and everything you’d expect. If the women complained about his treatment of them the women would get kicked out of the shelter.
Nine women sued.
And lost.
If you want to know why I do this and who I fight for and love and protect? It’s those women. I fight for them. Story in comments.
The terrorist group is planning a series of attacks on senior politician’s offices. The group is called Bash Back and they attacked a women’s conference recently.
Who are they? What do they want? 1/
They are a terrorist group that will attack anyone who dares cross them. This was a feminist conference called FILIA. They can’t tolerate the idea of women having any spaces for themselves. 2/
They aren’t hiding their intentions. Nor their tactics. They write “ensure your target can be hit repeatedly until they desist”.
At heart they are toddlers throwing a tantrum. But in dangerous adult bodies.
“The authors argue that “gendered” pregnancy care is too focused on helping women have healthy babies, and that it might be okay for transmen to continue taking testosterone during pregnancy despite the known health risks to the fetus and effects on its normal development. The desire for “normal fetal outcomes,” according to the authors, is rooted in a problematic desire “to protect their offspring from becoming anything other than ‘normal’” and “reflect historical and ongoing social practices for creating ‘ideal’ and normative bodies.”
I’m sorry. What did I just read? 1/
Let me repeat this part:
The desire for “normal fetal outcomes,” according to the authors, is rooted in a problematic desire “to protect their offspring from becoming anything other than ‘normal’” and “reflect historical and ongoing social practices for creating ‘ideal’ and normative bodies.”
A problematic desire to have a healthy baby?!! 2/
“The authors, a group of transgender sociologists and enthusiasts, and healthcare activists, with not one medical degree among them, argue to dramatically move the goal posts of medical ethics, choosing to completely disregard the health, safety, and well-being of the developing fetus, all in the name of “T” inclusion.” 3/