Before it goes down the memory hole, these are the comments to a 17 year old girl who was showering when a man walked in naked. She was understandably upset. Understandable to most of us. Here are some of the choice replies to her.
This seemed to be a common theme. Dozens of comments about her looks.
Former YMCA employee.
Weaponizing her tears is a common theme.
And for anyone who didn’t see the video in question:
Remember, this is a teenager. All those comments were said to a teenager.
Are we allowed to say the word? This is ______ing. This is teaching girls to ignore their boundaries.
While everyone was out here arguing over the definition of woman, Merriam Webster snuck in and stealthily changed the definition of female. So even if they lose and say a woman is an adult human female, they have taken over that too.
This is how they take over everything. 1/
Yes, they say sure, a woman is an adult female person. But now they have altered the definition of female!!
They have transed every species!!! A female cat has an identity now?
At least they seemed to admit there are only two with female being the opposite of male. 2/
Before you ask, they did the same with male. It’s an identity that is the opposite of female.
Even in their ideology this makes no sense. So don’t tell me this is an organic way of describing a changing language. 3/
Re: A male employee in a department store who went up to a young teen in the intimates section and asked her if she needed help.
What people don’t understand about predators or their supporters is how much they think they are victims. That surprised me. 1/
You’ll get a million excuses and always the girl gets blamed. They will pretend they are innocent saints. “He was just being helpful.” “What? What did he do?” “It’s just clothes!” “No one but you would object.”
And the rag€… 2/
So much rag€ at anyone that objects.
The rag€ to get you to stop objecting. If at first the cajoling doesn’t work and the innocent game doesn’t work then they move on to rag€. Pure unadulterated rag€. 3/
Imagine a man walked up to young teen in a lingerie section to ask if she needed help.
No decent man would do this. Indecent men pretend this is just “being helpful”.
You can tell instantly who is who by their reaction to this situation. 1/
Predators don’t come up to you twirling their mustache. They come up to you smiling. When caught they have plausible deniability. “Who me? I was just being nice! I didn’t do anything! I just offered that little girl some candy bc she looked scared! I was helping her!” 2/
They really don’t like older women bc we see right through them. They love kids. They can fool kids.
Underneath the smile is something dark and sinister. They immediately become enraged with anyone calling them out. Other predators often come to their support. 3/
The barrister for Mr Tickle is saying that Sall is not allowed to demonstrate a willful blindness with respect to gender identity.
Please understand where this law stuff is going. They are saying that you MUST believe that men can turn into women.
1/
This is what pronouns take you to. This is what it means when you say that women are a subset of women. The law being argued for is to say that you MUST believe this gender ideology.
That’s what is being fought here. 2/
Do you want it to be ILLEGAL for you to think this is a man?