There is something everyone needs to understand. The issues being raised about #AtomicHeart aren't about the ethics of you, the gamer, buying the game. It's about the ethics of the publishers and their eagerness to embolden warcrime supporters to make an extra dollar. A 🧵⬇️
First of all: MultiPlatform has an amazing and thorough article documenting the chaotic development practices and close Russian connections enveloping AtomicHeart.
I'll summarize some of its points below to elaborate on. multiplatform.com/2023/01/18/wha…
The Mundfish CEO's name is not Robert Bagratuni as listed on the studio's webpage. It's Maxim Zatsepin, a former Creative Director in the Mail(.)ru group. A company with extremely close ties to the criminal Russian government.
In 2017 the original office of Mundfish opened in Moscow. Initially advertised as a Russian company, the founders kept all financial accounts outside of Russia. After Feb.24 the company drastically shifted its public image from a Russian studio to an international studio.
2 of the 4 major investors for AtomicHeart are Russian companies: Gaijin Entertainment and GEM Capital. So we have an untrustworthy CEO, leading a shady development company, using Russian funding to build this game.
MultiPlatform puts it well: "Russia’s invasion of Ukraine ... showed that the Kremlin regime uses taxes of Russians and Russian companies to build up military capabilities and bloody actions on the territory of other countries."
But it goes further with GEM Capital's direct ties to both Gazprombank and VTB, two banks that are actively financing the war in Ukraine. Gazprombank is being DIRECTLY used to pay the Russian soldiers who actively commit war crimes. rferl.org/a/ukraine-gazp…
The war crimes being documented in Ukraine are among the worst seen in modern times. And these are just the ones that were solidly confirmed after closed investigations.
There’s dozens of thousands of such investigation still open... war.ukraine.ua/russia-war-cri…
So we have a Russian company, parading itself in the West as international, promoting a game that's funded by money dripping with blood, and when Ukrainians and other gamers call this out as unacceptable, they get death threats and slurs thrown at them.
The pushback against #AtomicHeart is being met with a lot of misguided anger. Some gamers think that they’re being policed by “a woke mob” who just hates Russians over a “stupid proxy war”, and “my $60 won’t make a difference”.
Neither of this is true:
Fist of all, Ukrainians are not a mob after your political leanings, beliefs or morale. We want to live. We’re after venues that fund our mass murder that happens right now, as you read this.
Hundreds are being killed by Russians every day. Or families, friends. Our gamedev
Whole cities get leveled. Now, your $60 may not necessary go into MRLS or strike drones. But war is not just fancy tech. It’s surveillance copters, sleeping bags, socks, food, binding tape for torturing and fuel in excavators that dig mass graves. It’s all bought with money.
The war in Ukraine isn't a "civil war", it's not a "territory dispute" and it isn't "a proxy war for influence." All of these are Russia’s dehumanizing propaganda that means to erase Ukraine’s agency and confuse foreigners into withholding solidarity. And ultimately - not caring.
The war in Ukraine is about the liberties and freedoms that a lot people in in the West unfortunately often take for granted. It’s a war of imperialistic expansion for Russia and it’s a war of defense against an oppressor state and terrorist regime for Ukraine.
It's very important to emphasize that this is not about Russians as ‘ethnicity’ or people. This is specifically about those who support the criminal Russian regime either explicitly or implicitly. These individuals are economically culpable for the war crimes currently committed.
So when we see Mundfish or #AtomicHeart, we see a company with a deceptive leader and past, producing a game drawing inspiration from Wagner PMC with money linked to a war of oppression.
A company whose representatives use vague, meaningless language to answer the questions about the genocidal war they’re financially tied to. They don’t feel like they have to take an outward stance because they know their game is going to make them money one way or another.
Mundfish has shown that they are untrustworthy, selfish, and are looking to deceive and abuse the advantages of the free world.
This is why @Microsoft (@Xbox), a company whose technology often shapes our present and the future, shouldn't promote #AtomicHeart. The same goes for @PlayStation and @Steam both to-go platforms for gaming. And everyone else who partakes in this promo:
These companies should care about protecting core human values, because they themselves became possible thanks to being established in free, democratic societies. It's a mistake to become a pipeline that funnels money that is used to erode these societies.
And right now is the time to make it clear to these companies that we care about their business practices. That associating and promoting those, whose money is directly involved in murder and terrorism does damage to their reputation.
#AtomicHeart doesn't need to be "boycotted" by players. Publishers promoting the game must be demanded to pull it from the shelves for risk of damaged reputation. Not only because of its revisionist propaganda but because it helps circulate money used to sponsor war crimes.
2 months ago the European Parliament declared Russia to be a state sponsor of terrorism. Gazprombank is its state bank, that’s been linked to paying those who commit terrorism.
Terrorism is a criminal offense, regardless of what you think about it. tiny.cc/8hj3vz
It’s disturbing to see how many third party companies are willing to promote a game that’s so very unabashedly linked to terrorism. And how little exposure and concern it’s raising among gamers. Or how it’s misinterpreted as cultural qualms. Terrorism is not a cultural qualm.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sometimes I think many bright minds followed me out of solidarity, but see the views I share on the Russian “opposition” or Germany’s role in this war as crass.
Well. I think calling Zeitwende policy “naive” or propagandists who equip Russian terrorists “opposition” is crass.
I insist for Germany’s whole political tradition to be addressed. Thinking about nepotism under Kohl I struggle to pin all slowness of innovation on Germans’ cultural aversion to change. Thinking about foreign policy under Schröder & co. “naive” is the last adjective I’d use.
Germany’s decades-long political tradition hasn’t been “occasionally ignorant” about Ukraine. It’s been brutally conscious, aware of the damage, and potential threats. It was irresponsible and corrupt. And at this point I find diplomatic roundabouts admirable but unhelpful.
Some Ukrainians don’t have detailed family stories about #Holodomor to share. I’ve learned that my grand-grandmother always got quiet and her eyes would fill with extreme, inarticulable terror if someone gently asked her about it. One time she merely said:
“Starvation is the worst. You can willpower your way through many hardships. But not famine.”
She survived the NS German occupation. And when Ukrainians share this experience it’s not to whitewash nazis. It’s to give a perspective of how terrible the Soviets were.
Many Ukrainians, including from my family, who survived 1933 died in WW2, or in another Soviet-made famine at the end of 40s, or during the many purges against those “suspected of spreading anti-Soviet sentiments”…
Wish people who come at Ukrainians with their expectations about conduct would give themselves a general privilege check. Try to survive this winter with little-to-no utilities, hustle between war trauma and obligations, hold a breath when reading updates from the frontlines 1/
Spend half of the time in bomb shelters, wondering how to live with the knowledge of what another torture chamber in places like deoccupied #Kherson uncovered.
Every day deal with death, sicknesses, struggle and uncertainty – 2/
And on top of it all - pompous diplomacy gurus who find the nerve to give Ukrainians a list of demands about “communication”, “professionalism”, and resort to petty blackmail about “risk of losing support”. As if victory over Russia is not a common interest. 3/
Dostoyevsky was an outspoken believer in Russian superiority via its Christian-Slavic moral exceptionalism. His literature flirts with these ideas, while his diaries explicitly capture Russia’s timeless chauvinism that resonates with many casual fascists up to date. 1/14
Nonchalant chauvinism remains prevalent in Russia in a way that makes Dostoyevsky’s far from being outdated. He sounds like everything a typical, modern, educated, “free-thinking” Russian would unabashedly concur to just about a few years ago. Elaborate verbosity included. 2/
Dostoevsky‘s diary is a mirror in which Russian liberals see themselves up to date: “misunderstood, unrecognized, unheard, aspiring for a united human front in peace and cooperation”. What neither of them sees is the absence of self-reflection necessary to achieve any of it. 3/
Strasbourg is one of the pinnacles of European discourse about democracy and human rights. The coda at the end of a session that frequently addressed the genocide of Ukrainians by Russians looks a bit out-of-place, to put it mildly.
Fun is good. Tactlessness - less so.
And if I were completely honest it looks a bit like mocking. Especially in the presence of speakers whose family and friends are either under pure hellfire at the frontlines or hiding in cold bomb shelters, without water and heating.
The argument “Ukrainians need to […play along with something…] - otherwise they can lose support” is dangerously underestimating and misjudging the implications of this war and its potential consequences for Europe and the rest of the free world.
Remember Iranian drones being called “scrap”? That scrap killed people. Tractors beating tanks? The tractors still run into mines.
Those “ill trained, poorly equipped” will fire at my friends.
It’s very important not to lose perspective while laughing at Russians: they will kill.
Only ≈1/10 of the 300k drafted Russians are untrained. They are by far not as unmotivated as I read of it English-speaking spaces. And their volunteers buy them gear. In Germany. Fly off to Turkey with it easily and everyone gladly pretends not to know what those items are for.
I would find it a lot easier to laugh along at how underwhelming Russians seem if those who stand against them for about a year at this point had the same number of tanks, jets and artillery and consisted of more professionals and not just of regular citizens like my family.