One of the best ways to defeat an adversary is to target their #strategy. To do that, we must understand it. Therefore, in my latest article, I explore Russian strategy, and its various components, for its continuing #Ukraine invasion in 2023. 1/25 🧵🇺🇦 mickryan.substack.com/p/thinking-abo…
2/ The plan for a ten-day lightening conquest of Ukraine, as described in a recent RUSI report, was – in the main – a failure. The Russians did make considerable gains in the south and the east, but their northern campaign was a military disaster. rusi.org/explore-our-re…
3/ Despite battlefield setbacks in the north and northeast of Ukraine, Putin and his defence and intelligence chiefs proceeded to assemble an alternative theory of victory for their invasion and attempted takeover of #Ukraine.
4/First, they prioritised their military operations, avoiding concurrent, multi-front offensives. From April 2022 they focussed on an eastern offensive, allowing them to husband remaining military forces for ops in the Donbas.
5/ Another element of the evolution of Russian strategy after early failures was holding Ukraine’s south, including Ukraine’s seaports. This is a key element of Putin’s evolved strategy because it offered the opportunity to strangle #Ukraine economically.
6/ A 3rd adaptation to Russia’s strategy was accepting that this would not be a lightening war. The evolved Russian strategy appeared to embrace the idea that western populations and politicians would eventually tire of the war. politico.eu/article/zelens…
7/ In September and October 2022, a series of Ukrainian attacks forced the Russians again to reconsider and adapt their strategy. This did not cause a reassessment of Russia’s strategic objectives however. Putin retained his maximalist objective to subjugate Ukraine.
8/ As @MarkGaleotti writes, “Putin’s war aims have remained constant & continue to center on the destruction of Ukraine as an independent state capable of joining the EU or NATO, the breaking of the will of its people to resist & will of the West.” inmoscowsshadows.wordpress.com
9/ But because of Ukrainian battlefield success and the increasing quality of Ukrainian weapons in the last four months of 2022, Russia had to evolve its approach. Over the last few months, Russia has adapted its strategy to achieve Putin’s war aims.
10/ The Russian strategy for its subjugation of #Ukraine is likely to have seven components in the coming year. These are informational, command and leadership, military, diplomatic, national mobilisation, economic and adaptation.
11/ Information Warfare. Russian narratives, including information operations to retain domestic support for the war and influence foreign populations, have been part of Russia’s strategy from before the war. They will continue in 2023.
12/ Command and Leadership. This month, Putin appointed loyalist Gen. #Gerasimov to lead the Russian invasion forces in #Ukraine. According to Michael Kofman, this was the resolution of competing visions with the Russian military for how to win this war. warontherocks.com/2023/01/manpow…
13/ Gerasimov must conduct battlefield offensives, and force a more unified approach between the Russian military and private military companies such as the Wagner Group. He must also oversee & integrate targeting strategic targets in Ukraine. And command the Russian military.
14/ Offensive Military Action. The deployment of tens of thousands of mobilised soldiers, as well as the recruitment of thousands of convicts to serve in the Wagner Group, has stabilised the Russian position in Ukraine over the winter.
15/ But military manpower initiatives alone will not win this war for Russia. Gerasimov was not appointed to command the Russian invading force just to defend captured ground. This will necessitate offensive action from the Russian Army.
16/ Diplomacy. The diplomatic efforts of Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov have been a key part of Russian strategy in this war. He has undertaken multiple overseas trips as part of these efforts.
17/ Belarus is likely to be a continuing focal point for Russian diplomacy. Putin visited Belarus in December 2022 for discussions with President Lukashenko. Countries like China also remain vital for Russia and will be a focus for Russia's efforts. carnegieendowment.org/2022/12/09/put…
18/ National Mobilisation. An important element of evolved Russian strategy has been the mobilisation of the Russian people and industry for the war.
19/ This has seen at least 300 thousand Russians inducted into the Russian military. At the same time, Russia has attempted to mobilise its industry to support the war.
20/ Economic Warfare. The Russian invasion has had a profound effect on Ukraine’s economy. This is a deliberate part of Russia’s strategy to constrain the ability of #Ukraine to generate revenue, while imposing costs through civilian deaths and destruction of infrastructure.
21/ The objective for Russia is to ensure Ukraine has limited capacity to underpin its sovereignty with sources of income. Russia needs to keep its economy functioning while it gradually throttles Ukraine’s. It is a critical element of their strategy. rferl.org/a/ukraine-war-…
22/ Adaptive Strategy. Russia has shown a capacity to learn and adapt their strategy when faced with battlefield setbacks, and western interventions that have enhanced Ukrainian capacity. Adaptation will remain an important part of their strategy in 2023.
23/ Putin’s view of being able to outwait the west may be another of his poor strategic assumptions. And, if Putin's strategy this year fails, it may just be the start of a cascading series of catastrophic events for Putin and Russia. mickryan.substack.com/p/thinking-abo…
24/ Owen Matthews has written: "He gained a fifth of Ukraine and increased the size of Russia by half a per cent. The price of his illusions was not only thousands of lost lives, but also a lost future for Russia." There is a lot riding on Putin’s revised strategy in 2023. End
25/ Thank you to the following whose images, quotes or links were used in this thread: @owenmatth @MarkGaleotti @POLITICOEurope @CarnegieEndow @DefenceU @KofmanMichael @WarOnTheRocks @RFERL 🇺🇦

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mick Ryan, AM

Mick Ryan, AM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WarintheFuture

Jan 19
From the beginning of the Russian invasion, arguments over provision of different weapons & technologies to #Ukraine have been waged in Europe and the US. Perhaps the most long-standing, and important, is provision of American or European tanks. 1/22 🧵🇺🇦
2/ My aim in this thread is not to argue whether they should be provided. I think it is obvious they should. If Russia can deploy T90s or even its new T-14s (according to British Intelligence), why are we denying similar capabilities to #Ukraine?
3/ The objective here is to explore the considerations for the introduction of western tanks into the Ukrainian armed forces. The need is well established. Tanks are a valuable part of the modern combined arms team. Tanks save lives!
Read 22 tweets
Jan 19
This week - big additional commitments to #Ukraine from Canada, the UK, Poland, Estonia, Sweden & the Netherlands. Another big package from the US coming soon. Since the October 2022 announcement, nothing new from Australia. 1/6 🧵 reuters.com/world/europe/d…
2/ On total bilateral commitments Australia just scapes into the top 30 beneath Latvia and Lithuania according to the @kielinstitute app.23degrees.io/view/DUeaa54W7… #ukrainesupporttracker
3/ This is parsimonious and short sighted from the world’s 13th biggest economy. Lighting up the Sydney Opera House, and kind words, will not help Ukrainian civilians injured and killed by Russian attacks.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 18
Over the northern hemisphere winter, eastern Ukraine has been the scene of bitter and intense combat. The offensives around #Bakhmut & #Kreminna highlight the different strategic & cultural approaches that Ukraine and Russia have applied in this war. 1/23 🧵🇺🇦
2/ Both offensives have featured trench and urban warfare, artillery duels, very short-range engagements between infantry and tanks, as well as long range strikes on supply and headquarters locations. But there are differences. abc.net.au/news/2023-01-1…
3/ One of the key differences is an asymmetry between Russian and Ukrainian operational thinking. For this Russian offensive, there has been a focus on securing towns like #Bakhmut & #Soledar that have limited strategic utility.
Read 23 tweets
Jan 16
Recently, comparisons with the WW1 stalemates on the western front from 1915 have been used by some observers of the war in #Ukraine. It makes for good headlines but there is one problem; it just isn’t true. 1/22 smh.com.au/world/europe/n…
2/ At the beginning of 1915, the war on the Western Front had reached a stalemate. There were technical, strategic and doctrinal reasons for this. The machine gun changed tactics and killed soldiers by the thousands, as did more accurate and concentrated artillery.
3/ Poor communications hampered the coordination of the different elements of the massive armies. A lack of protected mobility meant that even when a breach was made in enemy lines, the enemy could more quickly fill the gap than the attacker could exploit it.
Read 22 tweets
Jan 13
Earlier this week, I published a thread that was the first of two parts examining how #Ukraine and Russia might think about – and plan – the inevitable offensives to come in 2023. The #Gerasimov appointment pushed this second part back a couple of days! 1/25 🧵
2/ In Part 1, I proposed seven considerations for those planning these offensives: purpose; design; timing; location; resources; adaptation; & politics. I then examined the first 4 in detail. Today, I explore the final 3 considerations.
(Part 1👇)
3/ Resources. Offensive operations are hugely expensive in recon assets (to find, fix and kill the enemy), artillery, armour and mobility support (engineers), logistics and air support. Multitudes of each, combined in Brigades, Divisions or Corps, will be needed.
Read 25 tweets
Jan 12
It is 322 days since the Russian invasion of #Ukraine began. Today, an examination of the announcement that Russian General #Gerasimov ‘is taking charge’ of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. 1/25 🧵🇺🇦
2/ The Russian Defence Ministry has announced that General Gerasimov has been appointed “commander of the combined forces group for the special military operation in Ukraine.” bbc.com/news/world-eur…
3/ General Gerasimov is the Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces. He was appointed to this position by President Putin in November 2012.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(