Maybe us pro-nukes would be a little more tolerant of #wind and #solar if their grid integration efforts and subsequent electricity market rules were not solely designed to kill off perfectly good #nuclearpower plants.
And if you think there is a level playing field out there for wind, solar and nuclear to battle it out on merit, you are smoking crack. Everything is rigged against nuclear. The political institution pushing climate mitigation often hates nuclear power.
Get out of here with your “the economics just don’t add up” horseshit. It would if we had the political will to implement effectively. But no, we have a regulatory body that kills any hopes of implementation we have. I’m tired of the victim blaming nuclear receives.
Like we are told the constant abuse the sector gets is because we are a failed technology and are bad at everything. It is partially true the industry has no backbone to stand up to the constant mistreatment. But no, we should stop apologizing for our existence.
We provide 2/3rds of the carbon-free electricity in America, goddamnit, and we demand the respect we deserve. And letting our contribution start to be dismantled without any pushback is absolutely disgusting. Letting nuclear close is an abject failure of progressives politics.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phil Ord ⚛️⚡

Phil Ord ⚛️⚡ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FissionPhil

Sep 17, 2022
This is the paradox: Until we have the proper alternatives ready to do, we HAVE to burn fossil fuels to run civilization. This is the unfortunate case given fossil fuels are dangerously warming the planet.
So when climate activists demand we straight up stop fossil fuel usage now and ask questions later, they don’t know what they are talking about.
We need energy, a lot of it, all of the time. It is what underpins everything in human civilization. Food, shelter, clothing, transportation, entertainment, heat and cooling, governance, medicine.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 30, 2022
A common attack on #nuclear advocates is that we are trashing #wind and #solar. Wind and solar have so many limitations and drawbacks that simply talking about them is considered trashing them. Explaining why we need nuclear means telling the truth about renewables. 1/
The fact is simply this. Wind and solar make the act of decarbonizing grids to completion harder because they are variable intermittent sources of power we can’t call on. This is a physical fact that has been handwaived away since the original push to use those sources. 2/
Nuclear now has to be the technology that can integrate wind and solar into the grid. An example is @TerraPower Natrium. They are adding thermal salt storage tanks to deal with the randomness of wind and solar. Decarbonization would be a lot less complicated with just nuclear. 3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(