1/ Three years of destroyed economies, social isolation and deep social splits call for another anniversary ⬇️𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱⬇️ to celebrate the RT-qPCR manuscript by Christian Drosten (@c_drosten) & Victor Corman (@vmcorman), submitted on 21st Jan 2020 to @Eurosurveillanc.
2/ Before this publication, virologists were neither treated like superstars nor considered icons or half-gods. In 2009, Drosten almost succeeded in installing the false premise virology could supersede holistic medical sciences as discussed in this thread.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.280…
3/ Drosten is a virologist. He neither has any background in epidemiology nor has he ever worked in the civil service. He also doesn’t have an experience in public health. Yet he affected our daily lives to the level of whom to trust, meet up with or how to flush the toilet.
4/ Before January 2020, Drosten and Corman were common virologists at Charité Berlin, whenever they were not involved in economic implications (bit.ly/3nT0OWs). They also looked at coronaviruses in dromedary calves in the Middle East or Africa. 😍 #cute
5/ Finally, in January 2020, a "groundbreaking" paper was released that set the foundation for the mass RT-qPCR testing we rely on today. This work earned its author another well-deserved recognition, the German Federal Cross of Merit.
7/ Being part of the editorial board at @Eurosurveillanc has been advantageous for @c_drosten & @c_reusken to reach the one-day-peer-review ‘milestone’, even though they might have been excluded from the process. So far, providing the process protocol is being refused.
@Eurosurveillanc@c_drosten@c_reusken 9/ It's worth noting that Drosten hasn't been active on Twitter since 2016. Yet, on January 23, 2020, just as the pandemic was starting to grip the world, he suddenly resurfaced (with just 770 followers) to promote his publication. Coincidence or a carefully crafted PR campaign?
10/ On 9 Jan 2020 Drosten’s #overconfidence reached a new high by complaining that the correspondence to @NEJM did not cite his freshly published paper. Instead, the authors chose to refer to his protocol-design pre-release on @WHO.int (13th Jan 2020).
11/ Drosten aimed for an RT-qPCR protocol design, which could serve as a “robust diagnostic methodology”. However, the protocol design and its factual scientific precision somewhat resemble Russian roulette (concerning false positives; see below). archive.is/jh7T8
12/ Back in 2009, Drosten already followed a similar approach when he created a PCR test for the swine flu (H1N1). Regarding the question of why it is crucial to do so much testing if the strain is mild, he answered: “Because we remember the 1918 outbreak.”ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
13/ As mentioned in the introduction tweets, PCR testing (in 2009) already caused a pseudo-epidemic that was stopped by @wodarg and 13 other European parliamentarians as reported by the following @nature-article. nature.com/articles/nbt03…
14/ The @nature-paper also states that “it is disturbing that a rogue politician [...] can create such mischief for the @WHO and drug industry, despite virtually no evidence of wrongdoing. @wodarg was the prime mover behind the fake pandemic outcry.“ web.archive.org/web/2020101116…
@wodarg@Volksverpetzer@snopes 16/ In 2014, @c_drosten gave a striking interview for the German business magazine @wiwo. His statements back then are in contradiction with comments he made in 2020. Let’s take a closer look at what he said in this particular interview. wiwo.de/technologie/fo…
@wodarg@Volksverpetzer@snopes@c_drosten@wiwo 17/ As you can see, Drosten's statements since 2020 have been exactly the opposite of what he used to say. So where did this change of heart come from? 'Corruption' is the only explanation I got.
18/ To understand this, we need to go back another year. In May 2019, Drosten participated in a conference of the then-ruling German party @cducsubt on "strengthening global health". The guest list is noteworthy when considering the events of 2020.
19/ Remember these people from the Fauci Emails? What a coincidence again! In my opinion, it is quite remarkable to invite a virologist (with 700 followers on Twitter) who was prevented from causing a “fake pandemic” (sic! @nature) to such an exquisite and influential group.
20/ We have no idea what happened during that conference or why Drosten was even invited in the first place. All we know is that he helped fuel the pandemic several months later by publishing that very paper and doing the exact thing he heavily criticized in his @wiwo interview.
21/ It's also crucial to point out that COVID wasn't classified as a pandemic until March 11th, almost two months after the Corman-Drosten paper was peer-reviewed in a record-breaking time.
22/ It's the following measures that led to a Casedemic: 1. Eliminate symptoms from "diagnosis" 2. Mass test asymptomatic (thx @c_drosten) 3. Define PCR-positive tests as Covid19 cases (thx @c_drosten) 4. Repeat ad infinitum 5. Et voila! Casedemic served! (thx @c_drosten)
23/ All of this info was publicly available. To this day, Drosten has faced no consequences for his actions. I consider him to be the worst German since a certain Adolf H. He's a ruthless narcissist who, in my opinion, will stop at nothing, including stepping on dead bodies.
24/ Since then, the Vitamin D-denier @c_drosten has mostly retreated. He only occasionally crawls out of his rat hole to promote booster shots or similar things. In my opinion, Mr. Science™ shouldn't be allowed to get away with this so easily. We must not forget!
@c_drosten 25/ Because without him, there would be no Casedemic and thus no millions of lockdown and vaccine deaths. Our freedom also wouldn't have been severely curtailed. The wheels of justice turn slowly, but one day they will reach @c_drosten. There will be no escape for him! #TheEnd
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There are some truly based accounts out there that do what the MSM refuses to: speak truth to power and challenge the status quo.
In a world where censorship and conformity are the norm, it's more important than ever to support voices that refuse to be silenced.
A THREAD 🧵
#1 Jeremy (@RealJermWarfare) got red-pilled while most of us were still asleep. There’s hardly a famous person who hasn’t been on his podcast, and challenging the status quo is his bread and butter. A true friend.
#2 Tara Bull (@TaraBull808) is the first @sunfluencer affiliate who helped me spread the truth about Vitamin D. She’s fiercely dedicated to exposing the facts and genuinely cares about people. Let's get her to 1M before the elections.
1/16: How did ordinary citizens commit unspeakable evil in Nazi Germany? Stanley Milgram sought to answer this in 1961. His theory? Some people commit horrific acts simply by blindly obeying authority. What he discovered will make you rethink the power of obedience.
A THREAD 🧵
2/16: Milgram designed an experiment to test this theory. He wanted to see how far people would go in obeying an authority figure, even when it meant inflicting pain on another person. The results were more disturbing than anyone could have imagined. Here’s how it all unfolded.
3/16: The experiment involved 3 roles: the experimenter (authority figure), the teacher (unsuspecting test subject), and the student (the victim). What the teacher didn’t know was that the other two were actors. The real test was to see how far he would go in following orders.
In today’s world, masculinity is under attack, leading to a broader societal decline. Here are the TOP 10 reasons why our society is witnessing a collapse in masculinity.
🧵 A THREAD
1. Decline in Testosterone Levels: T-levels in men have been steadily decreasing over the past few decades, linked to environmental toxins, poor diet, and lack of physical activity. Lower testosterone reduces masculinity, fertility rates, and both physically and behaviorally.
2. Endocrine Disruptors: Chemicals found in plastics (like BPA) and pesticides can mimic or interfere with the body’s hormones, potentially leading to lower testosterone and a feminization of male traits. Avoid (micro-)plastics and embrace glass containers and bottles instead.
1/12 In 1936, a prisoner in India was given a choice: death by hanging or a slower, seemingly less painful method—exsanguination, where his blood would be drained until he died. The prisoner, hoping for a gentler end, chose the latter.
2/12 The prisoner was strapped to a cold, metal bed in a dimly lit, musty cell. He wasn’t blindfolded, forcing him to confront the grim reality. Directly in his line of sight was a glass bottle, ominously positioned to collect what he believed would be his draining life force.
3/12 The process began. The prisoner watched in horror as liquid began to drip from his body into the bottle. The dripping started fast and then slowed, each drop seemingly sapping his strength. The room was filled with the sound of his life slipping away.
🧵THREAD: Avicenna, a Persian scientist who lived over 1,000 years ago, conducted a remarkable experiment. He placed two healthy lambs in separate cages, but only one could see a wolf in a third cage nearby. The results of this experiment were nothing short of astounding.
#2 Both lambs were given the same feed, and their starting weights were identical. However, after several months, the lamb with a view of the wolf became cranky, restless, and weak, showing significant weight loss and signs of poor development.
#3 The lamb under chronic stress, constantly exposed to the perceived danger, eventually died. 🐑🪦 In reality, the wolf posed no actual threat, but this was beyond the lamb’s understanding.