1/15 Celsius frequently represented that it intended to create a “community” amongst its customers, to whom Celsius referred to as “the Celsians.” Celsius paired its public goal of creating a Celsius community with its promise that Celsius would provide a
Pages 240-244
2/15 measure of altruistic goodwill to customers. In a since- deleted 2019 blog post, Celsius wrote that it was “founded by an innovative team with a simple idea: Financial services should only ever act in the best interest of their community.”
3/15 The post went on to distinguish Celsius from interest- earning accounts at its competitor, BlockFi. Celsius noted that BlockFi’s terms of use expressly stated that BlockFi did not have a fiduciary relationship with its customers.
4/15 Mr. Mashinsky stated in this post that he “cannot imagine defining such an untrusting relationship between our community and our company. He then “encourage[d]” readers to “read our own terms and conditions and see how we are acting in your best interest.”
5/15 Mr. Mashinsky told the Examiner that he never personally read the Celsius Terms of Use. In the first version of the Celsius Terms of Use, governing all Celsius products and in effect at the time of this 2019 blog post, Celsius disclaimed any relationship
6/15 with its customers, stating “no provision contained herein shall be deemed to create any relationship between the parties hereto other than the relationship of Celsius and User.” The initial Terms of Use also disclaimed any warranty of Celsius’s
7/15 services and contained provisions limiting its liability. Starting with the second iteration of the Terms of Use that went into effect on March 5, 2020, and continuing through the version published on April 14, 2022, Celsius told its customers that
8/15 “[t]hese Terms and the holding of [the] Digital Asset relationship does not create a fiduciary relationship between us and you. . . . On March 11, 2018, Celsius posted to Twitter: “Integrity is at the forefront of every step we take, putting the community first.
9/15 You will hear @Mashinsky regularly share his beliefs about if you #DoGood you will also #DoWell.” On October 6, 2020, Celsius posted to its blog: What we bring to the economy, using what blockchain enables us, is a financial institution that puts
10/15 the community first and offers customers the best income because we can keep the expenses minimal. This is also a model to bring the full financial services to truly unbanked part[s] of the world which could, one day, make the cryptocurrency economy a
11/15 reality for the whole worldwide population. Can we really bring unprecedented financial freedom, economic opportunity and income equality to everyone in the world? We are Celsius. We dream big.
12/15 Celsius also regularly addressed its communications with customers to the “community” and held in-person “meetups” in various locations for customers to meet Celsius employees. In the weekly AMAs, Mr. Mashinsky told viewers that “we always lean on the conservative side ...
13/15 because we have to protect the community first” and that Celsius sought to hire people with a “proven” history of “put[ting] the community first.” Mr. Mashinsky often said that Celsius could “do good and do well at the same time.”
14/15 Celsius’s internal marketing strategy emphasized the “community first” theme. Celsius’s internal “Brand Guidelines” emphasized the community that Celsius claimed it put “first.” The Brand Guidelines directed Marketing personnel to use language in
15/15 public statements such as: “Do well by doing good. “Giving back is in our DNA, and we always want to put our community first.” “We earn using our community’s capital so it’s only fair we share our revenue with them.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/34 Celsius stressed security, stating on its website that “our top priority is keeping your assets secure” and citing “[t]op-tier Security & Cyber Defense leaders driving forward and protecting a mission-driven community." Celsius also emphasized the
Pages 246-253
2/34 “safety” of the Celsius platform as a low-risk place for customers to invest their crypto. Regarding security, Celsius’s website promoted its security certifications, “24/7 Security Operations Center,” a global team of cybersecurity experts, and
3/34 “industry-leading security infrastructure & asset protection.” During an October 2021 AMA, Celsius’s Chief Security Officer stated, “Our security slogan is ‘Keep safe, secure, and HODL’ ... That’s key for us and for you, of
1/14 Celsius repeatedly represented that it was better than a bank, frequently using the hashtag “#unbankyourself,” and that Celsius customers could gain “financial freedom” by joining Celsius. Celsius explained on its website that “P2P,” which
Pages 244-246
2/14 typically means peer-to-peer, instead signals financial freedom: "At Celsius, we believe P2P stands for Power to the People.” Likewise, in 2018, Mr. Mashinsky posted to Twitter that “P2P for
3/14 me means #Power2ThePeople,#Cryptocredit & #FinancialFreedom by the people for the people! #CelsiusNetwork.” Celsius posted to Twitter: We're providing a platform of curated services that have been abandoned by big banks — things like fair interest, zero fees & lightning
1/18 At the same time Celsius was struggling to balance its growth with revenue generation and its lack of sufficient risk or oversight management, Celsius engaged in a robust advertising campaign that did not reflect these challenges.
Pages 235-239
2/18 From inception, Celsius waged an aggressive public campaign to attract new customers to the Celsius platform and retain existing customers, and in many instances, to use existing customers as "ambassadors" to bring in new customers.
3/18 Celsius repeatedly emphasized multiple themes in its campaign, which continued even up until it filed for bankruptcy, including the following: (1) Celsius put its 'community' of customers "first;"
1/7 “Perhaps the harshest assessment of the Freeze Report came from Celsius’s Risk Team. In February 2022, members of the Risk Team discussed new deployment proposals. Mr. Sunada-Wong reminded the Risk Team that new strategies were not approved until the
2/7 “current Freeze Report was finalized. Tamas Antal (Head of Model Risk and Quantitative Analytics) in response, said:
‘From what I understand the main problem is not that people are not signing off on the freeze but that the freeze is taken way too seriously for
3/7 “what it is: it is one analyst’s lonely guess of what the firm’s positions are. It is a random spreadsheet that we (the firm) did not take seriously enough to assign proper resources.’ Mr. Chan agreed: ‘[t]he freeze is unfortunately one analyst’s guess of the firm’s
1/10 “In or before 2021, Celsius also formed a Coin Listing Committee to review and assess crypto assets as possible additions to the platform. The Coin Listing Committee met every other week and was chaired by Celsius’s Head of
Pages 217-220
2/10 “Research, Ron Sabo. One well-known problem that Celsius employees routinely mentioned was the listing (and potential deployment) of assets that did not yield any revenue or profit for the company. In June 2021, Yaron Shalem, then Chief Financial
3/10 “Officer, consulted with Mr. Tappen and Mr. Nolan and told Mr. Sabo that if Celsius did not have a way to deploy an asset, it should lower the reward rate for the given asset. Mr. Sabo initially questioned the decision, suggesting that Celsius look at the larger market
1/9 “When Mr. Maglic arrived at Celsius in June 2021, ‘there was no robust liquidity framework’ and ‘no firmwide understanding of what our liquidity was on a coin level and . . . at top of house.’ He prioritized developing a framework for measuring Celsius’s
2/9 “liquidity and then expanded the infrastructure to encompass risks related to other areas such as market, credit, and economic capital. The Liquidity Reserve/Modeled Liquidity Outflow (‘MLO’) report, first created during the summer of 2021, offered the
3/9 “missing insight into Celsius’s liquidity. The MLO is described in Celsius’s Liquidity Risk Policy as ‘a set of models, rules, and business logic designed to determine liquidity under a given scenario,’ with the underlying report intended ‘to ensure that the Firm maintain[ed]