It starts by taking stock of the post-Covid situation, in which the "engines of this unjust status quo—capitalism, patriarchy, colonialism, and various fundamentalisms—are making a bad situation worse"
And then analyses how the "energy transition" plays out differently in the Global South and the Global North
"What’s new about this current moment are the “clean energy transitions” of the North that have put even more pressure on the Global South to yield up cobalt and lithium for the production of high-tech batteries, balsa wood for wind turbines, land for large solar arrays..."
"Governments of the South, meanwhile, have fallen into a debt trap, borrowing money to build up industries and large-scale agriculture to supply the North." @DebtforClimate
"Today, the imperative to move beyond fossil fuels without any significant reduction in consumption in the North has only increased the pressure to exploit these natural resources." #degrowth
The eight demands from the Manifesto for an Ecosocial Energy Transition from the Peoples of the South are essential for a just future.
More information on the launch of the manifesto by @PactoSur with Maristella Svampa @SvampaM, Trusha Reddy and Ashish Kothari @chikikothari can be found here
While postgrowth and degrowth are often defined as the “planned” reduction of production and consumption, there is little engagement with what “planning beyond growth” could look like.
There is a wide acceptance, at the abstract, most general, even definitional level, that degrowth involves planning or amounts to a planned transition. 2/
However, there is strikingly little explicit engagement with, debate on, and research into what exactly ‘planning for degrowth’ could look.
Scientists for civil disobedience and against the eviction of #Luetzerath
Here's our open letter with @SciReb_Germany calling to stop the eviction of this village that is blocking the expansion of one of Europe's biggest lignite mines.
Please sign, spread, support, come. 🧵
We cannot accept the decision that the village of Lützerath is to be sacrificed to the open-cast lignite mine Garzweiler II.
As scientists we say: In view of the climate catastrophe, not a single tonne of fossil fuels should actually be subsidised and burnt worldwide any longer.
The destruction of Lützerath is symbolic of the ignoring of scientific findings by political decision-makers.
New OECD report on tipping points should frighten everyone.
“Recent state-of-the-art research shows that important tipping points are already ‘possible’ at current levels of warming and may become ‘likely’ within the Paris Agreement range of 1.5 to 2°C warming…”
The @OECD report summarizes latest research that shows these "self-reinforcing, severe & irreversible changes could occur far sooner & at lower levels of warming."
"The crossing of one climate system tipping point can generate positive feedbacks that increase the likelihood of crossing other climate system tipping points"
In 30 years of UN climate negotiations, eliminating the primary cause of global heating - fossil fuels - has never been mentioned in the decisions, not even in the COP27 in 2022.
António Guterres, secretary general of the UN, warned: “Our planet is still in the emergency room. We need to drastically reduce emissions now – and this is an issue this Cop did not address. The world still needs a giant leap on climate ambition.” theguardian.com/environment/20…
“I have three priorities for our economy: growth, growth and growth.” Liz Truss’s pronouncement reverberated around the world. So, too, did her attacks on what she called an #antigrowthcoalition. @TheAntiGrowthC4
.@trussliz focus on economic growth is politically misleading, economically wrong-headed and profoundly outdated.
By putting growth at the centre of her political programme, she is invoking an economic ideology – the “growth paradigm” – that emerged during the 1950s
The critique of economic growth is as old as growth itself. And it’s not just about the more recent critique of GDP or about growth as a policy goal, but goes much deeper. How was growth criticized and by whom?
It starts from the premise that while critiques of growth are likely to shape future social conflicts around economics, environment, & politics, we know little about the diversity of exiting growth critiques or about their historical origins and longterm trajectories.
In fact, while economic growth is at the centre of not only of politics and public debates, but also of economics and other social sciences, we lack a coherent research agenda on the questioning, critique of and resistance against growth in a long-term perspective.