The #MAGICapp is a scam. It is seeded from ONE source and distributed as if it was created by doctors in your country.
It was not.
It was created by Pharma invested entities.
They know we know, and have just restricted access to the archived UK versions.
The #MAGICapp is supposed to be a "living guideline" but:
-it has no authors.
-it is rebadged for every country
-it tells you not to give antibiotics
-it is responsible for most of the #COVID deaths around the world
-nobody is liable app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/49…
So who wrote it?
Who is responsible for telling GPs that there was no treatment for COVID, antibiotics don't work and you should euthanise old people rather than treat them?
And a pretence that the guideline has authors. It does not. It is ghost written.
Yet all these authors signed up to be listed as real authors of a guideline could not possible have written in time, and the same version distributed around the world.
These are the people behind the protocols.
And... Just like MAGIC, your granny is denied the #3tablets she needs and instead is given euthanising drugs.
What @TheBurninBeard is saying here is that the clinical samples that had "COVID" also had gene signatures of Mycoplasma fermentans, a US military pathogen that can be used as a vector to carry viral clones.
@SabinehazanMD found it too.
🧵
#spraygate @BrokenTruthTV
Can you see that Norman Pieniazek, who headed up the CDC's research division at the time that the @CDCgov sent biological weapons to Iraq to start a war, took himself out of this thread?
Every vaccine scientist will try to convince you that the drop in u25 cancers was due to the vaccine when it was merely due to the change in screening.
But check out the HUGE RISE in 25+ cancers. This pattern is repeated in Scotland and Australia where similar changes to the screening age were made a few years after the introduction of coerced vaccination, obfuscating the figures to hide a scandalous rise in 25-29 age cervical cancers after the vaccine rollout.
For clarity most cancers in this age group are early and detected on screening before they become advanced. Moving the screening age meant that they were diagnosed later and therefore in an older age bracket.
The big red arrow is pointing to the preinvasive diagnoses which tend to mirror the actual cancers - the upper chart was too busy.
Here is the same from the OP with arrows showing both cancer (above) and precancer (below) which both rose significantly after the vaccine rollout
And here is the same data from Cancer Research UK (smoothed) showing a doubling of cancer rates in the over 25s for at least 5 years after the vaccine rollout. cancerresearchuk.org/health-profess…