I asked the New Bing if "reasoning from first principles" is somewhat analogous to writing atomic notes in #PKM, and discovering new combinations.
Similarities and also differences. Answer below ⬇️
Both methods involve breaking down complex concepts into simpler and more fundamental ones, and then building up new connections and insights from them. Both methods also aim to improve one’s thinking, learning, and creativity by avoiding existing biases and assumptions.⬇️
Reasoning from first principles requires asking powerful questions and getting down to the basic truth, while writing atomic notes requires creating textual documents that contain exhaustive coverage of a single concept in its briefest form
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Systems Theory/#Cybernetics: reducing external complexity so we can build up internal complexity.
Feedback loops everywhere in the process (iteration)🧵
ZK uniqueness: not sorted by topic, emphasizes development of ideas (Folgezettel), atomic ideas.
Physical size constraint of cards forces the formation of nuggets that are reusable and have composability.🧵
Bloom's Taxonomy describes the stages of the #learning process of a concept. How do these stages correspond to changes in a #PKM (Personal Knowledge Management)?
🧵
The 1st stage is recall or root learning.
Eg the law of conservation of energy.
PKM: a single note, contents perhaps copy pasted from class or the internet
🧵
In the 2nd stage, there is some understanding: ability to paraphrase and relate to other concepts.
Eg. In mechanics the total of potential and kinetic energies remains constant. Energy conversion. Relations to mass, gravity, velocity etc.
PKM: more notes and links between them.🧵