Using a data pool of 1000 reports, in assessing the severity of #adverse_effects they found: more than 12% of reports were life threatening or fatal. 72.9% of reporters reported their initial injury became chronic and non resolved over time
Using 1000 reports these are the bodily systems effected: Cardiovascular and circulatory 27.24%, Neurological 22.6%, Musculoskeletal 13.41%. No body system was exempt from injury
At which dose did the #adverse_effects happen? 1st dose 56.85% of total events, 2nd dose 37.34%, 3rd dose 5.81% Just because you dont have an injury at dose 1, it does not mean you will be exempt from harm with further doses
Why did their sample population of 1000 Canadians take the #covidvaccine?
41.2% MANDATES; 23.4% social responsibility; 14.02% travel; 12.1% trusted Dr; 7.1% personal choice; 2.1% inclusion
How many of the 1000 sample had their post vaccine adverse events reported to the Government pharmacovigilence database (like #nz Medsafe)?
Only 3.9% of ACTUAL injury is reported to the Government database.
In #nz Medsafe estimates that approx 5% of ACTUAL adverse events are reported to them. We currently have 64,800 reports to the end of November (our latest data). Multiply this by 20 times for the true number experienced in NZ - 1.296 million ACTUAL #adverse_effects
ARE WE WITNESSING BIG PHARMA CLOUT INTERFERING WITH DUE PROCESS IN THE NZ ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY?
No....not a "conspiracy theory". A rational, logical question with evidence to support, in a thread below
It has been an emotional and fraught few days in New Zealand.
Two days ago 4 of the key decision makers during the Covid 19 response, have in unison, refused to appear before the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the NZ Covid response.
They were set to appear next week for livestreamed cross examination....only the second (and final) such transparent and open week of the entire inquiry.
Everything else has been conducted privately behind closed doors.
Who were the four?
*Jacinda Ardern - former Prime Minister
*Christopher Hipkins - former Covid Response Minister, replacement Prime Minister when Ardern fled (and current leader of the Labour party)
*Grant Robertson - former Minister of Finance
*Ayesha Verrall - associate Minister of Health; Minister for Covid 19 response
The live testimony was designed to demonstrate TRANSPARENCY to a New Zealand population, many of whom are jaded, distrustful and oppositional as a result of the plethora of heavy handed and questionable governmental decisions during the Covid 19 response.
The "pushback" to this refusal has been pervasive with a Curia poll showing more than 60% of the 500 surveyed, believing they should appear live.
The political OPTICS are devastating for Chris Hipkins as he hopes to lead the TRANSPARENT Labour party to victory in the next election.
WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING HERE?
All 4 key decision makers refused to front following legal advice from the SAME legal company - Dentons.
First point.....you and I (tax payers) paid for this legal counsel.
Dentons is a leading specialised health law practice in New Zealand. The firm advises a diverse range of clients in the health sector including PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AND REGULATORY BODIES.
Dentons has experience acting on behalf of pharmaceutical suppliers in CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS WITH PHARMAC (the Govt department responsible for funding drug contracts in NZ)
Dentons’ global and New Zealand health law practices include advising overseas pharmaceutical companies on clinical trial agreements, INDEMNITY arrangements, and commercialization of novel pharmaceutical ingredients.
Globally, Dentons’ Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Litigation practice handles PRODUCT LIABILITY compliance, and regulatory issues for life sciences companies, which could include vaccine manufacturers, but no New Zealand-specific cases involving Pfizer are mentioned.
The choice of the law firm that all four of these politicians has turned to, with its extensive background in health law, pharmaceutical contracting with PHARMAC, leads me to the obvious question....
IS THE EMBARGOED NZ PFIZER CONTRACT BEHIND THEIR REFUSAL TO FRONT THE NZ PUBLIC?
Note below: "Advising overseas pharmaceutical companies on INDEMNITY ARRANGEMENTS in New Zealand.
Also note Dentons France works directly for Pfizer
Think Pfizer. Think Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine.
Note too that Denton's also advised in relation to arrangements with BioNTech (Pfizer's partner in the Covid mRNA injectable), to establish an mRNA research and development platform with clinical scale manufacturing and fill/finish capability in Victoria.
They are in boots and all in the legal arena of mRNA and biotech in Australia
Men and women from around the land came together PEACEFULLY to protest the Covid vaccine MANDATES that destroyed their lives.
No, they were not "anti vaxers"
They were
teachers, doctors, nurses, midwives, surgeons, psychologists, home makers, shop assistants, hair dressers, road diggers....and teenagers who had been sacked from supermarket jobs.
Ordinary New Zealanders whose lives had been upended by a mandate to take a still experimental, novel Gene Therapy product.
Some read the clinical trial data and said NO
Others had pre existing medical conditions that made them high risk for harm from the injection.
Still more had taken a first dose through mandates, and nearly died....and were REFUSED MEDICAL EXEMPTIONS
Today I celebrate the
COURAGE AND RESILIENCE
of ordinary New Zealanders who made a medical decision and lost everything
I think I lost my love because we no longer deliver on the most important part of what we promised to do. We are no longer the “critic and conscience of society”.
you might not be aware that we are no longer a place for debate.
We are no longer centrists. We have drifted to the political left, way left. And that leftist view which has many merits, and many downfalls cannot be debated with impunity. We are strong on virtue signaling.