2/Anatomy of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is best seen on the sagittal images, where it looks like the McDonald’s arches.
To find the IFG on MR, I open the sagittal images & scroll until I see the arches. When it comes to this method of finding the IFG, "i’m lovin it."
3/Inferior frontal gyrus also looks like a sideways 3 on sagittal images, if you prefer.
This 3 is helpful bc the inferior frontal gyrus has 3 parts—or "pars"
4/Starting anteriorly, the first part is the pars orbitalis. This name is easy to remember bc the pars orbitalis is right next to…wait for it…the orbit.
Orbits are in the front & so the pars orbitalis is at the front of the inferior frontal gyrus
5/Behind the pars orbitalis is the pars triangularis—another great name.
This region is shaped like an upside down triangle—so it is easy to remember its name is triangularis
6/Finally is the pars opercularis. This one is a bit harder to remember.
It is called the pars opercularis bc it forms part of the frontal operculum.
Frankly, I think the name sounds the genus & species of a type of possum. But operculum has nothing to do w/possums
7/So where does the word operculum come from?
Operculum is Latin for lid.
“Oper” is from same derivative for “over” & “cover” & “aperture.”
It gets it name bc the pars opercularis forms the "cover" or lid over the insula
8/Operculum comes from the same derivative as “over”—so I like to call the pars opercularis the “pars overlayeris” instead
This helps me to remember that it overlays the insula, like a blanket or cover.
9/IFG is home to Broca’s area, responsible for language fluency. Damage to Broca’s causes an expressive aphasia or difficulty producing speech
If you draw a line through the sylvian fissure underneath the IFG, this line turns the sideways 3 into a sideways B, & B is for Broca
10/So where is Broca’s in the inferior frontal gyrus?
Well, that is controversial & depends on who you ask.
But the most common localization is between the pars triangularis & pars opercularis
11/You can remember that bc Brocas is between the "triangle" pars & the "cover" pars.
Just remember:
If you only use triangles as a cover, you will leave people speechless (or with a Broca’s aphasia!)
12/On axials, Broca’s area is more difficult to find bc you don’t have a McDonalds sign or triangle to look for, like on sagittals
My rule of thumb is:
If the frontal horns of the lateral ventricles look like eyes, Broca’s is sort of like Princess Leia buns on either side
13/So now you know the anatomy of the inferior frontal gyrus, its parts, & its relation to Broca’s area.
Hopefully, now when you are asked about this region, you can speak about it fluently!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Brain MRI anatomy is best understood in terms of both form & function.
Here’s a short thread to help you to remember important functional brain anatomy--so you truly can clinically correlate!
2/Let’s start at the top. At the vertex is the superior frontal gyrus. This is easy to remember, bc it’s at the top—and being at the top is superior. It’s like the superior king at the top of the vertex.
3/It is also easy to recognize on imaging. It looks like a big thumb pointing straight up out of the brain. I always look for that thumbs up when I am looking for the superior frontal gyrus (SFG)
@TheAJNR 2/Everyone knows about the spot sign for intracranial hemorrhage
It’s when arterial contrast is seen within a hematoma on CTA, indicating active
extravasation of contrast into the hematoma.
But what if you want to know before the CTA?
@TheAJNR 3/Turns out there are non-contrast head CT signs that a hematoma may expand that perform similarly to the spot sign—and together can be very accurate.
1/My hardest thread yet! Are you up for the challenge?
How stroke perfusion imaging works!
Ever wonder why it’s Tmax & not Tmin?
Do you not question & let RAPID read the perfusion for you? Not anymore!
2/Perfusion imaging is based on one principle: When you inject CT or MR intravenous contrast, the contrast flows w/blood & so contrast can be a surrogate marker for blood.
This is key, b/c we can track contrast—it changes CT density or MR signal so we can see where it goes.
3/So if we can track how contrast gets to the tissue (by changes in CT density or MR signal), then we can approximate how BLOOD is getting to the tissue.
And how much blood is getting to the tissue is what perfusion imaging is all about.