Perhaps @FraserNelson isn't a reliable source for #r4today to interview considering the Spectator's track record on covid reporting, they promoted GBD and platformed ppl like David Patton from disinformation group HART
Perhaps it's useful to mention that Oakshotts partner is Richard Tice whose Reform Party is seeking to pick up the anti-lockdown and antivax vote?
Perhaps you might want to mention the role the Telegraph had in creating and promoting UsForThem whose members are now tweeting about Sunak being a puppet of the WEF and are defending Bridgen and using a vaccine genocide hashtag
Perhaps you might want to ask which journalists from Spectator and Telegraph, and ppl they have platformed attended QAnon John Mappins Nuremberg 2.0 antivax party?
What about how Allison Pearson in the Telegraph promoted the launch of the Safer To Wait campaign whose flyers were being handed out by mobs of antivaxxers who were abusive at school gates and even tried to break into school grounds
It's pretty disgusting and dangerous that the Telegraph would print praise for a campaign that went on to suggest parents could give their children Ivermectin rather than having them vaccinated
Sarah Knapton who is one of the coauthors for the Telegraph's "lockdown files" is even mentioned in the #HARTleaks as being someone who is willing to get their disinformation into the mainstream media
This is very much like the Spectators interview with Sunak which was a rewriting of history which claimed no economic modelling was done despite Sunak having commissioned his own modelling by a guy the Spectator then employed! …terdisinformationproject.substack.com/p/expose-the-e…
There's also the fact the Telegraph headlined an atrocious antivax VAER dumpster dive by Hoeg that massively over exaggerated myocarditis creating unfounded concern in child vax
Don't get me wrong, this isn't a defence of Hancock, care homes are an absolute scandal, however those with access to these files can't be trusted to not engage in selective quoting to fit the narrative they want
They are likely to withhold important information that doesnt fit their narrative
I'm sure they won't report on meetings between government and the Telegraph's editor arguing against measures in the midst of the deadliest wave of the pandemic as reported by @BylineTimes
While starting off by focusing on deaths in care homes, the Telegraph will fail to acknowledge that it was pushing for policies that would have caused even more death and harm
The aim of the lockdown files will be to support the GBD narrative
And we have to consider Oakshotts track record, imagine somehow sitting on evidence of Russian collusion without apparently realising it
Can we trust her not to miss some other important info this time around.
Bridgen is the most public example but you have to question how the hell we ended up with MPs at an APPG platforming ppl who had called for their colleagues to be hanged …terdisinformationproject.substack.com/p/uk-parliamen…
Fraser Nelson sets out the
narrative the Telegraph is going
for, it will be to argue that there is
no decent evidence for nearly any
measure and that we should have
done a Sweden, they will claim
the Great Barrington Declaration
was correct (they werent)
We have the expected call for reform of public health, this will be to put blocks on action being taken, and to pull in alternative experts like the ones who claimed there couldn't be a second wave
If transparency is so important will the Telegraph be releasing details of the meetings its editor had with Johnson in the run up to him ignoring SAGE and not introducing measures at the end of September 2020?
Will the Telegraph provide full access of the files to other journalists to verify that they aren't selectively quoting or omitting sections that are in the public interest?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#r4today Telegraph literally ran a disinformation campaign in regards to schools and covid, they have a massive self interest in shaping the narrative #HARTleaks
Oakshott shows her agenda in an interview with @bbcnickrobinson says she was acting in the national interest, "lockdowns were forced on us with flimsy evidence"
She says no journalist could sit on a cache of information and not inform the public
SL:Does anyone have any evidence at all?
LCK: We do
SL: No not you, you don't count...
You'd think the UK clinical lead on covid in children would want to work with the registered charity for @LongCovidKids
You'd think they might want to work with the kids who are actually sick rather than dismissing their experience by quoting their own study which has confounding issues
You'd think by now they would be focused on trying to identify biomarkers
Many schools don't allow students to go to the toilet during lessons, only during break and lunch, but sometimes students have gotta go so staff are told to use their judgement,but some kids use this to bunk off and mess around, so now schools lock toilets itv.com/news/central/2…
Going to the toilet can seem such a simple thing, but in the context of a school it can be a minefield, some schools are constantly spending money to repair intentional damage to toilets
So in theory the best way to do this is to trust students and then sanction those caught messing around/vandalising/vaping etc
But schools don't have the staff to monitor toilets in lesson time, so how do they catch those messing around?
@RCPCHtweets and various ppl at UKHSA claimed measures were causing disruption in schools not covid
Many measures were dropped just as Delta arrived, more dropped before Omicron
Was argued vaccination would cause more disruption than covid
Dropping measures didn't reduce disruption, it increased it. After changes sickness went up, was having classes with third to half of students off sick, several times we ran out of staff and sent whole year groups home as there simply weren't enough adults left standing
"The best place for kids is in school, so stop testing now" is what @RCPCHtweets said
@ChildrensComm set a 100% attendance target and encouraged parents to send ill kids to school
Occuring at the end of a week where a review claimed Prevent was too focused on RW extremism and "mainstream" views were being caught up in the programme, many commentators seem to have forgotten there was also the incident of the guy throwing bombs at an asylum centre
Perhaps we should be asking how far right narratives are being mainstreamed by the RW press?
Shawcross certainly seems like a questionable choice to provide a fair review
On covid the press, in particular the Telegraph and Express have been happy to promote members of disinformation groups who liken vaccines to the holocaust and have called for ppl involved in the vaccine to be locked up