CJI DY Chandrachud: Please don't raise your voice. This is not the way to behave as the President of SCBA. You're asking for a land allotted to the SC to be given to the bar. I have made my decision. It will be taken on 17th and it will not be first on board.
Singh: Just because the bar doesn't do anything doesn't mean it should be taken for granted. I feel strongly for this. 20 years lawyers have been waiting to be allotted chambers.
CJI DY Chandrachud: Mr Singh, I am the Chief Justice of India. I have been on the bench for long. I have never let myself be brow beaten by bar members and I will not let it happen in the final 2 years of my life.
#SupremeCourt hears the suo motu case taken up over illegal sand mining in the National Chambal Sanctuary and the threat to endangered aquatic wildlife, including gharials.
Bench: Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta.
Last month, the Court passed various stringent directions for immediate compliance to curb illegal mining.
Counsel: There is a very sorry state of affairs. 16 vulnerable routes were identified and there are no CCTV installations in the entirety of these routes. The last mining management plan expired in 2020 for Rajasthan. 50% of posts in the Forest department are vacant or they are managing through home guards.
#SupremeCourt dismisses a writ petition seeking a Special Investigating Team or a Court-monitored committee to investigate cross border smuggling of Areca nuts and trace the tax evasion trail under GST and Customs.
Bench: Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta.
Petitioner's counsel: nuts are being imported into the country from Indonesia and from all over the world. There is clear cut smuggling. Especially in North East.
J Nath: what can we do? Approach the agencies who are working on this. There are so many of them.
J Nath: there are a number of prosecutions. The agencies are doing the work.
Counsel: there are no arrests except in cases where they are caught red handed.
J Nath: you are a resident of Basti. How do you know what is happening in the north east and at the border?
#SupremeCourt hears the case where it earlier raised concern over High Courts delaying decision in bail matters and called for details of pending matters across the High Courts
Bench: CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi
Order: Most HCs have furnished data. Though info. was readily available, but we do not deem necessary to incorporate in order, as most HCs have taken initiatives for timely disposal. Allahabad HC, where pendency is too large, and despite the fact that most Hon'ble judges are dealing with hundreds of cases in a day, problem continues.
Order: We leave it to CJ of HC and Admn Committee to develop mechanism so that there is a definite date appearing in all bail applications...by judicial resource aggregation...in cause list also, listing of bail matters is to be prioritized
Similar mechanism needs to be evolved by Patna HC, where unfortunately bail matters are sometimes adjourned for months. Pendency of over 63000 bail applications in MP HC about a year back is also an alarming situation. Though we are hopeful that meanwhile a substantial part might have been disposed of. This order should not be taken as an aspersion on functioning of any high court.
Order: Some suggestions put forth before us -
- Listing of bail matters on weekly/fortnightly basis. There can be automatic software-based system
- Mandatory filing of status report before first hearing. Petitioner's counsel to serve copy of petition in advance in office of Adv General or designate agency of Union/State and proof of such service should be made mandatory for filing bail application
- HCs depending on pendency and resources evolve mechanism of listing bail applns on alternative data or atleast within a week with mandatory condition that Union/State shall be represented
- Automatic re-listing of bail applns. not taken up
- HCs shall also resolve to fix outer timeline for disposal of bail applns
- HCs also need to evolve practice of discouraging Union/State counsels from seeking casual/avoidable adjournments, reminding them the Court's solemn duty towards fundamental rights.
#SupremeCourt to hear today two writ petitions registered suo motu over the recent incident involving an #AndhraPradesh High Court judge who ordered 24-hour police custody for a young advocate mid-hearing
Bench: CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi
The cases were registered on representation/resolution of the Bar Council of India and Supreme Court Bar Association.
Hearing begins
CJI: I got a report from the Chief Justice...that oral observation was not made part of judicial order
Sr Adv Vikas Singh (for SCBA): There should be some in-house...younger members of Bar should not be discouraged
CJI: We are also sensitizing judiciary at every level how to encourage younger members.
#SupremeCourt #SCBA #BCI #AndhraPradesh
Order: A video recording was widely circulated on social media. The incident pertains to an exchange between ld. judge of Andhra Pradesh HC and a young member of the Bar, during which ld. judge allegedly expressed displeasure at lack of diligence in conduct of proceedings. Ld. judge thereafter is said to have dictated an order that young counsel be taken into judicial custody for 24 hrs.
#SupremeCourt to hear today the #WestBengalSIR matter and the suo motu case taken up over judicial officers' gherao in the State
Bench: CJI Surya Kant and J Joymalya Bagchi
Elections in West Bengal concluded on April 29 and results were declared on May 4.
Hearing in #WestBengal judges' gherao matter begins
CJI: Security issue - what's the position?
ASG SV Raju: Will file latest status report on next date
CJI: If investigation is complete, you file chargesheet
Order: Mr Raju states that time be granted to file 1st status report. We are however of the view that investigation agency complete investigation expeditiously and preferably in 2 months. Law to take its own course. Admn and [...] directed to continue to provide protection to judicial officers. If authorities find there is no threat perception, apt. action may be taken.
#SupremeCourt #JudgesGherao
Main matter hearing begins
Sr Adv Kalyan Banerjee: I will show 31 seats...margin is less than that...
J Bagchi: Whatever you want to say about results...which may have materially affected...that requires an independent IA
CJI: meanwhile, we will get some information from...
Banerjee: 862 votes, my candidate has lost...5000 plus votes under adjudication
CJI: We can only improve further adjudication of appeals
Banerjee: Difference is 32 lakhs total...loss of margin 32 lakhs...and 35 appeals pending...ex-CJ has resigned
CJI: So what can we do? We can't compel
Sr Adv Menaka Guruswamy: There's a sense that it will now take over 4 yrs.