CJI DY Chandrachud: Please don't raise your voice. This is not the way to behave as the President of SCBA. You're asking for a land allotted to the SC to be given to the bar. I have made my decision. It will be taken on 17th and it will not be first on board.
Singh: Just because the bar doesn't do anything doesn't mean it should be taken for granted. I feel strongly for this. 20 years lawyers have been waiting to be allotted chambers.
CJI DY Chandrachud: Mr Singh, I am the Chief Justice of India. I have been on the bench for long. I have never let myself be brow beaten by bar members and I will not let it happen in the final 2 years of my life.
Supreme Court Bar Association to soon begin farewell function for Justice JK Maheshwari and Justice Pankaj Mithal
SCBA President Vikas Singh: There is an interesting thing which came out before I came to the dias. Justice Karol mentioned he was the member of the Bar and why can't judge continue to be a member of the Bar. From now onwards we will be making all retired judges as honorary members of the Supreme Court Bar Association.
Singh: mostly when judges retire they stop coming to the supreme court, I have not discussed with the executive committee but personally I have no problem. We will see what can be done, please be with us. members of the bar should benefit from your experience.
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by @wfi_wrestling challenging the Delhi High Court order permitting wrestler @Phogat_Vinesh to participate in the selection trials for the Asian Games 2026.
Advocate: This is quite disturbing
ASG KM Nataraj appears
Advocate: apart from consequence, this was not dictated in open court. look at the consequences, its an ad interim order.
J Narasimha: we have some questions to ask you
Adv Divan: i just want to participate, I am not seeking any concession
J Narasimha: you took a sabbatical that august 2025 you will start parcipating. 3 june 2025 you informed that sabbatical ended and you become a mother. the eligibility commences with the ITA letter. ITA wrote a letter on 3 july that you will be eligible from janaury 1, 2206
J Narasimha: two disturbing things- they have written you missed doping test and it is a very serious lapse. what we need Madhavi you to answer and 4 may there is an order of ITA which considered your explanation how you were not available with doping test. you said you were busy with the assembly and it has not considered your explanation satisfactory.
in the meanwhile the asian game schedule already started. writ petition is filed in May. first is you want to participate after sabbatical comes to an end. anyone must be prepared, you are no ordinary person.
#SupremeCourt hears batch of petitions challenging NEET-UG cancellation by @NTA_Exams
@NTA_Exams SG Mehta appears.
J Narasimha: how much monitoring of implementation has happened? how this failure occured? despite high powered committee if this incident happened, there is something wrong with the original recommendation or there is no proper implementations
Retired J Radhakrishna appears: we have suggested for long term 35 recommendation. for short term, we recommendated 60 which have been mostly implemented.
#SupremeCourt pronounces judgement in a batch of petitions involving the issue of huge delay in pronouncement of judgements after conclusion of hearing.
Bench: Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi.
Court: for complete justice to the parties, intervention is necessary to formulate uniform guidelines to address delays.
The guidelines shall Take effect from the date of this judgement.
Court:
1. the high court to to pronounce the judgement within a maximum period of 3 months from the date of reserving.
2. Bail applications should be heard and order should be pronounce and uploaded the same day. If it is reserved it should be pronounced on the next day and uploaded to the website.
Calcutta #HighCourt to hear the anticipatory bail application by Actor-Director #ParambrataChatterjee in an FIR over promoting enmity among groups during the 2021 West Bengal Assembly Elections through social media posts.
Bench: Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
Advocate Sarmistha Basak, for Chatterjee: Every case has its limits of being stretched. Petitioner is a known actor in Bengali Film industry.
Advocate Sarmistha Basak: The allegation is that on 2 May 2021, about 5 years back, he made a tweet. Kindly see the nature of the tweet. Sections are of 153A AND 109