.@BorisJohnson has raised concerns about @RishiSunak’s new Brexit deal for Northern Ireland and said he will find it “very difficult” to vote for it.

Thread 🧵👇1/6

#WindsorAgreement
#WindsorFramework
In a Westminster speech, the former prime minister said:
‘I’m going to find it very difficult to vote for something like this myself, because I believed we should’ve done something very different. No matter how much plaster came off the ceiling in Brussels.

2/6
I hope that it will work and I also hope that if it doesn’t work we will have the guts to employ that (Northern Ireland Protocol) Bill again, because I have no doubt at all that that is what brought the EU to negotiate seriously.’
3/6
.@BorisJohnson raised numerous concerns about the Windsor agreement, adding:

‘I’m conscious I’m not going to be thanked for saying this, but I think it is my job to do so: we must be clear about what is really going on here.’

4/6
‘This is not about the UK taking back control, and although there are easements this is really a version of the solution that was being offered last year to Liz Truss when she was foreign secretary…’

5/6
‘This is the EU graciously unbending to allow us to do what we want to do in our own country, not by our laws but by theirs.’
6/6

💪🔥

Well said @BorisJohnson 👏

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Baa Ram Ewe 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🐑🐷🦃🚜

Baa Ram Ewe 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🐑🐷🦃🚜 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShepherdWales

Mar 4
Now we get onto what @BorisJohnson said in the HoC that could be held to be ‘misleading’

Worth noting that what he was actually asked is as important as what he then said in response

When you’re asked a specific question you answer that question

#SueGray #PrivilegesCommittee
Dec1st 2020 from PC 👇

Boris Johnson said:

‘…all guidance was followed completely in no 10’

As per the #PrivilegesCommittee initial report

But

Let’s look at what he was actually asked…
.@Keir_Starmer asked:

‘As millions of people were locked down last year was a Christmas Party thrown in Downing Street for dozens of people on December the 18th?’

That’s specific

So let’s look at Dec 18th again

➡️He wasn’t there. It was the Allegra video 👀
Read 19 tweets
Mar 4
So now they get into the actual substance taking each event that received fines for anyone at anytime

I am going to simply put their description for each event alongside what #SueGray said Boris’ presence and involvement was

May 20th 2020-BYO Email
No fine for Boris

PC/SG 👇 ImageImage
19th June 2020

The one @BorisJohnson and @RishiSunak got fined for

PC/SG 👇 ImageImage
13th November

#SueGray concluded that Boris attended this until about 8pm when he went to his flat where some advisors were already having a meeting

No fine for Boris

His presence was deemed ‘necessary for work’ &it therefore was not a party then

PC/SG 👇 ImageImage
Read 7 tweets
Mar 4
So I’ve started reading the report from the privileges committee.

It’s a severe case of moving the goal posts from lying about parties to being reckless about social distancing

I’m going to create a thread as I go through it so it will take time 🧵 1/?

#borisjohnson #partygate
1. To intend to mislead is to lie

To inadvertently mislead is to report what you think is true but later find out that it wasn’t

That’s what the ministerial code distinguishes between

What’s this addition of reckless? How are they defining that in action? Image
Read 15 tweets
Mar 3
Examples of Adam Wagner- who you may recall was constantly on @GMB @SkyNews etc pushing the narrative that it was all about the PM based off #SueGray interim report in January 2022
Also evidence from the Good Law Project themselves that they threatened the @metpoliceuk with being sued if they didn’t investigate #partygate
All in build up to initial #SueGray report. Image
Adam Wagner admitting that he is in fact a ‘leftie lawyer’&demonstrating his view of @BorisJohnson at the very start of the pandemic. #SueGray

Was his reading of the law that he expressed on many media outlets impartial??

I think not ImageImageImage
Read 5 tweets
Mar 3
There is no doubt that there were parties(in the traditional sense)within WM during the covid pandemic

I don’t doubt the evidence contained within #SueGray reports

I say reports because she released two

One when @metpoliceuk took over and one at end 🧵👇 1/?
What never sat right with me in #SueGray ‘s report was that the evidence contained in the final report showed that Boris was barely at these events AND YET

2.
He was being held as the focus (indirectly) within the narrative whilst the behaviour of senior civil servants appeared to be less significant and imo they were let off the hook

Why?

In fact in @PaulBrandITV podcast one of the female whistleblowers agrees with me on this
3.
Read 19 tweets
Nov 11, 2022
Anyone angry at @MattHancock for covid restrictions needs to read about Manaus in Brazil

Anyone angry at @MattHancock for having an affair&breaking own rules-planks and splinters

Anyone angry at @MattHancock for CH deaths need to read the published report for perspective 🧵1/3 Image
Angry at not being allowed to a funeral? A shop? School?
The people of Manaus would’ve loved to have had a leader who didn’t call them sissys and who enforced some infection control to prevent them attending loved ones funerals

scientificamerican.com/article/a-city…
Start of covid in UK, cases were thought to be lower than they actually were
We were all watching scenes in Lombardy
Fit&well non symptomatic ‘bed blockers’ were sitting ducks
We didn’t have enough tests for a new virus
Care homes were to isolate discharges&use infection control
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(