Thread by @mawworn

@Silkee_D response to a creditor's question was to like, a reply to the original question:

This one

So if I follow this in a line, you liked Santiago's reply to Keith's conclusions, as follows;

Santiago: "The data aligns with what he's reflecting and his fiduciary to creditors."

Keith: "So when you vote to subsidize CEL with the majority of the customers BTC, ETH, and stables just remember it ain't to help the majority of customers. Just the fractional minority"

Keith

states:

"I'm sure you've looked at the Data @NovaWulfDigital but just in case you didn't. 1,028 accounts hold 59.15% of #CEL a further 5,130 accounts hold over 73% CEL value. So it's pretty obvious who you care about, and it ain't the majority of customers, that's for sure."

Are these your conclusions as well, or did you like something else about the tweet?

You agree with Keith implying @NovaWulfDigital not treating creditors equally?

And that 81c petition date price dilutes creditors reserves?

May I ask what opinions you hold of our other assets?

Help us understand how respecting the petition date of $0.81 will dilute the holdings of other creditors, Santiago says have less than $100 or what ever, please, how?

How is Keith's personal opinion representative of our situation?

Keith has already arrived at his destination before he's finished his tweet. He's above all this, sprinkling his nuggets of wisdom like Salt Be.

"I'm sure you've looked at the Data"
"So it's pretty obvious"
"So when you vote"
"subsidize CEL with"

Thanks Keith, who ever you are.

@Silkee_D uses this account to make official statements, it's the account creditors identify with, so it's understandable I would be concerned with its public shows of support for non creditors advocating discrimination among assets on nothing more than personal prejudice.

I hold about 27k #CEL token, I'm not an insider. I used the same mechanisms to invest with #Celsius as everyone else.

@Silkee_D are you advocating I suffer $20,000+ dollar loss?

It's the tweet you supported, so how should I take it, as a yes or a no?

This is the original tweet in question, asking why he liked a tweet about a non creditor who checks his Twitter every 29 minutes to see if anyone has tweeted anything about #Celsius.

https://twitter.com/mawworn/status/1631070946122498049

#CEL81 #Celsius @CelsiusNetwork @CelsiusUcc @JasonNewNW @MichaelAbbateNW @MCagney @NovaWulfDigital

He attacks #Celsius creditors.

Keith has been doing this to us for 10 months straight, non-stop, every 29 minutes, he attacks. Perfectly normal behavior for a non creditor.

This is the witch hunt part, where they drop "evidence" to rally a lynch mob.👇🏽

https://twitter.com/ChazzonKe/status/1631749026679869440?s=20

As they rip and tear at #Celsius creditors for nothing more than believing in something.

Rip and tear, consequences be dammed, they say.