You hear that creditors, the kid has scored big, or so he thinks...
He provides a couple of screenies for proof.
Flipburger is saying is, that thanks to his hearsay, K&E went chasing after some money and scored big.
Now, we can only go off this screenshot, it's all he provided for context, this is all what he wants us to see, and that will do.
Mr. Hurley is 'sandbagging', withholding evidence or arguments until a strategic moment in the proceedings, such as after the evidence phase has closed.
By waiting until this point, he can introduce Mr. Frishberg's hearsay as some sort of re-animated corpse type evidence.
Mr. Hurley is attempting to catch the court off guard or create doubt in their mind regarding the issue of notice to Voyager.
The court was not fooled:
THE COURT: On the excuse of (indiscernible) neglect factors on the notice issue, you never actually — you did give Voyager an address and never actually sent notice to Voyager to change that address for notice purposes, isn't that correct?"
Translation:
THE COURT: Even with this Frishberg hearsay as your excuse, you can't bullshit the facts, can you? You never actually did give Voyager an address and never actually sent notice to Voyager to change that address for notice purposes, ain't that right, you sandbagging cobbler?"
The judge is highlighting the fact that Mr. Hurley and his client still have a responsibility to ensure that notice is properly given, regardless of any other issues or factors that may have arisen in the case.
As Crytpoyolo points out:
Flipburger, is he a passenger on somebody's else train?
Does he suffer from some major mental issues?
Is he a rat like Keith, with no morals or ethics?
Sorry, yes, Flipburger was used as the butt of Hurley's joke/excuse, that was the play, what Flipburger was actually saying or implying, was never even considered.
ROLFMAO
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've not removed funds from #Celsius, since early 2021.
I completely, reject this insidious and threatening legal over-reach. The committee's and its council's job, is to protect creditors, not set the dogs on them!
This gives precedent to attack other #Celsius creditors.
You don't protect creditors by attacking other creditors. (ponzi)
If it happens once, it will happen again. (if one asset is revalued, others will follow)
Kelvin showed there is no need for clawbacks, therefore this is a calculated legal maneuver. (precedent)
1: This one time I was in a 7/11 when it got robbed, and they didn't catch the owner/gunman, but they arrested me, because I was a customer of the store.
While it's CEO is busy gaslighting #Celsius creditors, a reminder of what BTTF is:
WTF is a BNK TO THE FUTURE, a bAnk with no A in its name?
Here's the crash course:
Apparently he's going around suggesting that BTTF is choicer than Wulfy. He was saying something about available liquidity, and he's been busy making fun of the #HASH token.
So it sounds like he's saying that BTTF and its mighty BFT token, are a better choice.
@Silkee_D response to a creditor's question was to like, a reply to the original question:
This one
So if I follow this in a line, you liked Santiago's reply to Keith's conclusions, as follows;
Santiago: "The data aligns with what he's reflecting and his fiduciary to creditors."
Keith: "So when you vote to subsidize CEL with the majority of the customers BTC, ETH, and stables just remember it ain't to help the majority of customers. Just the fractional minority"
Remember this, the next time he is given the mic by the @CelsisuUCC during town halls. Remember also, this person has legal representation, but the UCC keeps giving him the mic.
4 times so far, that's already 90% more than ANY other creditor.
Where he takes the mic and proceeds to bullshit the horseshit out of the #CelsiusUCC, then promptly turns around on Twitter and continues his psychotic attacks on the creditors who believe in a ReOrg AND EQUAL TREATMENT OF ALL ASSETS.